Muncha

🇬🇧🇮🇳 🕉

[Surya Kanegaonkar @suryakane]

The authorities didn’t even string the Washington regime along till mid terms. A flat out “no,”- great going. All the CEO could do in response is shake his fist, promote racist context, and spuriously claim that colonialism is a net positive for the colonized.

[Sonam Mahajan @AsYouNotWish]

The Pakistani military has gagged the media too, directing national TV channels to feature only ISPR-approved security commentators and analysts so civilian casualties can be downplayed while emphasising military losses, helping to build public support for Pakistani actions in PoJK and shape the narrative around ongoing state excesses.

[Aditya Raj Kaul @AdityaRajKaul]

Pakistani security forces firing at Civilians in PoK.

Disturbing visuals are emerging from Kotli in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, where Rangers are reportedly accused of opening fire on peaceful and unarmed protesters.

Where is the UN?

Amnesty International and HRW?

[Sidhant Sibal @sidhant]

Hope international community is watching situation in Pakistan occupied Kashmir says MEA Spox Randhir Jaiswal

[Dawood Safi @Da_Wood_]

Pakistani Military regime is burning Kashmir and killing Kashmiris

[Meru @MeruOnX]

Massive human rights violations are being committed by the Pakistani Army, yet the world remains silent.
@amnesty @UNHumanRights @hrw

[Kanwal Sibal @KanwalSibal]

“He has anchored Indias perception of itself in a worldview rooted in Indian heritage, not western secularism.”

What is wrong with this? Why should India divorce itself from its own heritage and define itself by yardsticks that have no civilisational basis in India?

There has been no conflict between temporal and ecclesiastical power in India, as in the West.

Interestingly, the Enlightenment in the West has “pagan” Greek roots.

Hindu civilisation is inherently secular.

The secularism debate in India is political, rooted in the partition of the country on the basis of religion and the political need to integrate the Indian Muslims in an independent India.

Western ideas of secularism have been artificially planted in India and have created political, social and religious dissensions in our country.

The burden of being “secular” in India should be shared equally by all religious communities. But is it the case?

European and US societies have deep Christian roots. Europe defines its roots as Judeo-Christian. It has powerful Christian lobbies that exert influence in their societies as well as colour the European world view.

The Evangelists in the US, the global power of the Catholic church, the religious activities of the Presbyterians- and all have been active in conversions in India- call into question “western secularism”.

Western societies have an understanding of Abrahamic religions but cannot intellectually and politically connect with Hinduism and hence the obsession with the caste system, cow worship and perceived social ills.

More can be said.

Erik Solheim may mean well but the phrase “Hindu nationalism” is a wrong term that distorts reality and carries a negative connotation.

India wants to be India, defined by its own civilisation and not western idioms.

[Signal @signalapp]

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.

https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p

[NPOV @npovmedia]

Who decides what the internet "knows" about an organization? That process starts on @Wikipedia.

In the case of @HinduAmerican, we found that four editors were responsible for most of the page's content—helping shape how the organization is represented across search, AI, and the wider web. 👇

[Arun Pudur @arunpudur]

‼️Hannah Ellis Peterson, British Agent who works for the Guardian.

She was in the forefront of Bangladesh Islamists Riots coverage.

[Shesh Paul Vaid @spvaid]

Shameful @UNHumanRights @UN

[Chris Blackburn @CJBdingo25]

I'm not sure British media are doing their due diligence on the Henry Nowak issue. Khalistanis have injected radicalism, and sometimes the glorification of violence and intimidation, into Sikh communities in the UK.

Boosting loudmouths who support radicalism isn't a good idea. @LBC take note.

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 NEW: Sikhs in Southampton say they’re scared to leave their homes after facing racial abuse over Henry Nowak’s murder

[@thetimes]

[Josh Wolfe @wolfejosh]

This is a disgusting disgraceful and intentional attack and threat on Indian Americans and all Hindus. 🇺🇸🇮🇳

Denounce it.

[Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ @sankrant]

“Hindu for Human Rights” is the Islamic proxy group created for waging narrative war against Hindus. See the reveal.

[Laav Patel @VaidikaHindu]

Claims that Henry was killed because he was white, or that Digwa acted out of Sikh beliefs, were not established by the court. Motive and intent are central to understanding why a crime was committed, and the court made no finding that either factor played a role.

[Hindu American Foundation @HinduAmerican]

HAF RESPONDS TO THE INVESTIGATION BY @npovmedia!

A small group of anonymous editors shape how millions of people understand an organization.

HAF’s Executive Director @SuhagAShukla and Managing Director Raj Rao respond to findings from NPOV’s investigation by @AshleyRindsberg into the editing of its Wikipedia page, raising questions about editorial bias, conflicts of interest, sourcing standards, and the power to shape public perception online.

Watch this exposé now!

[Savitri Mumukshu - सावित्री मुमुक्षु @MumukshuSavitri]

Even the ex-founder of Wikipedia is calling out Wikipedia for allowing malicious propagandaists linked to Audrey Truschke to smear the reputation of Hindu American Foundation. Imagine how cleverly the hatemongers have manipulated online media to ensure that biases against Hindus become deeply embedded.

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

Just four Wikipedia accounts can smear the reputation of an organization like the Hindu American Foundation.

Think this an isolated case?

BTW, Ashley Rindsberg (@NPOV) does some of the best reporting about Wikipedia and its bias—not just left-wing bias. Follow.

[Ashley Rindsberg @AshleyRindsberg]

For years, major institutions have framed India and Hindus through the lens of nationalism, extremism, and suspicion. But what we've uncovered on @Wikipedia raises a deeper question: who gets to write the public record?

Our investigation found that a small cluster of anonymous editors controlled more than 80% of the @HinduAmerican page. Among the findings:

Blatant Conflict of Interest: The editors aggressively shaping HAF’s page were the exact same people controlling the Wikipedia profiles of HAF's legal adversaries and academic critics.

Inserting False FARA Allegations: Editors laundered complaints from HAF's opponents into "facts," using demands for a DOJ investigation to falsely brand HAF as a foreign agent

Administrative Silencing: An admin with supreme platform permissions deleted quotes from HAF's leadership, stripping the organization of its right to reply to allegations.

Over four years (2021-2025), editors systematically erased HAF’s identity as an American civil rights group, transforming its Wikipedia page into a heavily curated dossier of accusations. Our report from @npovmedia documents how it happened. 👇