@Adam_J508 @DefiantLs I think criminals should be punished for the crimes they commit. Im sorry you dont. Deportation is not a sufficient punishment for rape.
@Adam_J508 @DefiantLs Regardless, they are. Anyone arrested in the US is afforded due process.
My disagreement is that if we deport them, we cannot convict them of the actual potentially committed crime. Wouldn't you rather the criminal actually be punished?
@Adam_J508 @DefiantLs Because its a pointless bill. These things are already illegal. Foreign nationals who commit felonies on american soil are already deported.
@AzulaeXIV OWOD really is generally better developed for story purposes. Especially Mage IMO. The major problem with Chronicles is they wanted to avoid a metapolot like OWOD had and it made the setting much more anemic for long term interest. It is, however much tighter ruleswise
@NT78stonewobble @RehabCinema @esjesjesj@mikeymumbelz Sorry you're too stupid to understand what moving goalposts is. But that's your problem not mine. I'll be muting your idiocy now.
@NT78stonewobble @RehabCinema @esjesjesj@mikeymumbelz I couldn't dream of competing with you in that department. Especially if you think what I said agrees with you.
@NT78stonewobble @RehabCinema @esjesjesj@mikeymumbelz The thing you clearly misunderstand is that the original question had no greater criterion so asking for someone to justify WHY they think something fits that answer is perfectly normal and logical, not moving the goalposts. Its asking the answerer to establish the criterion.
@NT78stonewobble @RehabCinema @esjesjesj@mikeymumbelz Lol no it isn't. Moving goalposts means changing the criterion. Asking someone how their claim meets the criterion is not changing the criterion. Holy shit you're dumb.