Reporter: "You told us yesterday that Israel was going to strike Iran, which is why we had to intervene."
Marco Rubio: "That's not true. Were you there yesterday?"
Reporter: "Yes, I asked you the question."
🚨 BREAKING:
A man wearing a shirt reading "Where is Jeffrey Epstein's client list?" interrupts CNN's live broadcast during the Republican National Convention.
🚨 BREAKING
Dua Lipa on the Epstein files: "Instead of focusing on the victims of trafficking and rape, it seems they're hiding everything to protect themselves. It's interesting how the media manipulates and distorts things, even in the darkest moments."
People will stand outside abortion clinics, trying to stop women from entering, but they’ll never show up at orphanages to help the children who are already there.
And that’s the harsh truth.
This goes crazy 🔥
Zohran Mamdani did not hold back:
Reporter: “Why are you against Donald Trump?”
Zohran: “He’s a fascist.”
Reporter: “Why?”
Zohran: “He says Medicare is impossible while spending $500M a day bombing Iran and Lebanon. Americans are tired and so am I.”
An American politician with actual spine. 👏
Wait. So a woman in the military was raped by her commanding officer, because he used his key to sneak into her quarters, and a judge just decided that being raped was "one of her duties" and declared it a workplace accident??????????
Who the fuck is this judge? How does one even come to that conclusion??
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee announces plans to rename the Nashville International Airport in honor of Dolly Parton.
The proposal will be discussed at the Metro Nashville Airport Authority’s meeting on September 17.
(https://t.co/V1Y6gPgFvR)
A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment.
The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents.
The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.”
(https://t.co/dB9uM8NG4c)
@washingtonpost Wait.
The First Amendment won't protect my right to criticize Israel but it will protect child sex abuse?
Why are we protecting pedophiles?!?