(by now this should be obvious but here's the belated disclaimer that I am not a professional historian nor a physicist or any other kind of topical clue haver)
I suspect they ruled cause they were the “best connected”, which happens to have some correlation with age, which allowed them to implicitly pretend that (1) they ruled because of their longer experience and (2) you too can rule when you live long enough
@anonynaut Thesis: people only lived to about 40
Antithesis: people who survived childhood had normal life expectancies
Synthesis: child mortality was the biggest difference but all ages saw higher mortality
@lefineder I’m surprised Pompeii was still close to the top 10 largest cities of the empire … or is the list just a small sample all over the size spectrum?
And a continuation with enough differences that it shows which parts really matter
Horses? Yes
Germs? Yes
Better health/diet? Not at all. The yamnaya had this advantage but the colonists of America did not. The native Americans ate much better and still lost
@ryxcommar Also, as someone who’s hired and trained many juniors: hiring juniors is an investment in the future, which makes less sense when the future is more uncertain. Both in terms of “will my company still exist/be growing” and “will we still need so many devs”