There is no legitimate reason at all why AI has to be specifically programmed to be indistinguishable from human beings. They are making the choice to program it so that you can see her breathing and blinking. She even stumbles over her words. I challenge anyone to come up with a single scenario where these kinds of features are necessary in a legitimate application of this technology. I can think of countless scenarios where these features are necessary in illegitimate and socially corrosive applications of the technology.
Not a single conservative Christian has argued that the men involved in the sex orgy behaved morally. You cannot find a single example of anyone making that argument because nobody has. The problem for you is that the argument we are making — that no rape occurred, and sex orgies are bad for all involved — is obviously right, but you can’t bring yourself to admit that we’re right. So you make up some other point that none of us are making and rage against that instead.
I have students who will spend fifteen minutes trying to figure out how to get around doing five minutes of work.
And I don't even mean this as a complaint about laziness (but they are also lazy). I just think some of them have become so used to being able to escape boredom immediately that the prospect of actually just sitting there with the work and doing something even mildly difficult feels wrong to them.
We expend a ton of energy in education attempting to figure out how to keep students engaged. It might be better spent on teaching kids how to work even when they aren't.
@AliAmongFlowers Gaia brand is the one I use. I keep them on hand always. At the slightest hint of the start of something, bam! If you’re already full blown, it will shorten the span, too.
Are you as aware as you should be of how much censoring is going to increase the more we use AI? You should be terrified of what you'll never be allowed to know.
I had to "bully" Claude into making this graphic. Sometimes it outright refuses to answer a question, or find and link me a source, because it has decided that some things are not "appropriate." It refused to link me to know, long-published footage of 9/11 jumpers, for example.
I asked for a simple diagram with the words you see. As soon as I entered the prompt, Claude started spinning its wheels with the message "considering request for help with a sensitive stereotyped blah blah blah."
Woke is built in. And not just any woke. Hardcore woke. Look at the graphic it didn't want to make because it was allegedly derogatory toward people with narcissistic personality disorder/"pit mommies".
Contemplate that. Look at the kind of people it is programmed to protect from criticism.
-J
@JoshDaws We should put it to work where it will serve us well without a drop in quality output. I worry that it will further create unrealistic expectations in creative work regarding turnaround time and conscientious revision and editing. I have seen AI be put to meaningful use.
Homeschooling a five-year-old has made it increasingly clear to me that moving away from memory work was an absolute disaster for education: doing memory work *increases the ability to remember stuff in general, which makes learning faster!*
“Outside fire” is a polite way of saying homeless drug addicts burned up an RV and multiple structures.
This is all of LA if defund the police Nithya is Mayor.
My biggest problem with libertarians is that they can usually rouse themselves to fight for weed and porn and everything destructive, and rarely anything good and virtuous. As a general rule, libertarians are useless-to-destructive coalition partners.
Automaticity on math facts makes problem-solving feel like moving puzzle pieces. Without it, each piece is a heavy weight. This deficit compounds like high-interest debt as topics get more advanced.
Hannah-Jones deserves mockery & scorn. She hasn’t learned anything that impacts the bullet-proof unfalsifiability of her worldview. She still despises white people & thinks progressivism is the way, the truth, & the life. Her daughter believes all this, too. Good faith not earned
You really have to love that anytime one of these guys describes a very straightforward criticism of an outcome that was long ago predicted by conservatives, they have to clarify that the position is being held by a liberal now, so that makes it OK.