@xoCC

小资金合约分享，撸空投分享

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@monad， $mon，越是热门的项目越没有散户撸的机会，反撸概率极大

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@cishanjia 币圈人看好的比如crcl都不要去，特别是这个假慈善家，他在giggle上赚麻了，giggle他就是车头

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@Linfree8 在哪之前能不能归零让大家捡0价格筹码

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS 不归零，dev不清仓，现在就是dev建设盘，真正能100m以上得是社区盘，dev在社区里面想都不敢想是什么后果，社区完全就是为dev服务

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS ，妈的，你们韭菜怎么还不来吗，你们不买我这个庄家怎么跑了，估计来个大买单5000u以上就会跌破80了

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS bag上的asteroid也是不能买的，原因就是dev没清仓，懂的都懂，像币安人生一样，你在车上就不会涨，你下车就要人来操盘了，本质上是不允许你赚钱，你只能进去接盘，接盘了还必须建设，否则马上归零

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@BTCdayu 庄家给你们kol发点筹码，然后你们喊单，最后把你们所有粉丝及散户收割完，简直完美

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@0xbitqin 归零送他们筹码就来，敢归零吗

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@mewudi669 是马斯克显卡吗，

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@web__3hero 抄底💩，抄底100%筹码然后打入黑洞，直接让代币消失

[Dev03 🪐 @Hec_77]

Will @Polymarket finally take this into account ?

A 20yrs old Trader @0xDinoCrypto went big on " Yes " with ~$35k on the Polymarket Market that '' MicroStrategy would sell any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026.'' (which they did).

Has Sent a formal legal demand letter to Polymarket and Filed complaints with the FBI, CFTC, and FTC.

Also says he’ll keep fighting through every legal/regulatory channel.

The issue has now escalated a to real legal and regulatory complaints, curious to see his next moves

Do you think they will take him serious and finally answer him ?

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I have decided to speak publicly.

I am 20 years old. I am a second-year undergraduate student at King’s College London.

I am not a fund. I am not an institution. I am not a professional trader with a team behind me. I am just a student who read the market rule carefully and believed the English words meant what they said.

I put around 35,000 USDC into YES on the Polymarket market about whether MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026.

I did not do that because I was gambling blindly. I did it because I read the rule. I read it again. And again.

The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold any Bitcoin by May 31.

It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31. It did not say there had to be an SEC filing before the deadline. It did not say later evidence would not count.

To me, that matters.

I have studied enough to know that words matter. Rules matter. English matters. If a market writes one condition before people trade, then after the outcome adds another condition through “context,” ordinary users have no protection.

Without adding extra market context after the fact, I still do not understand how this market can fairly resolve to NO.

These 35,000 USDC are not just numbers on a screen to me. This money matters to my life. I cried for an entire night. I felt helpless in a way I have never felt before. I even had thoughts of ending my life.

But I am still here.

I am still here because I realized this cannot just be about me. If I disappear, the story disappears. If everyone stays quiet, the next person will be alone too. The next market will happen. The next unclear resolution will happen. The next ordinary user will be told to accept it and move on.

That is why I started #StopPolyScam.

Some people contacted me and told me to launch a meme coin around this. I refused.

I do not want people’s money.

I do not want to turn anger into another token.

I only want fairness.

I want Polymarket to answer one question in plain language:

Where did the written rule say “publicly disclosed by May 31”?

If that rule exists, show it.

If it does not exist, then users should not lose because of a condition that was never written before they traded.

I am asking journalists, lawyers, crypto researchers, public figures, exchange founders, and anyone with influence to look at this carefully. Do not believe me blindly. Look at the rule. Look at the timeline. Look at the evidence. Then ask whether this is how a serious market should work.

I know I am small. I know I may lose. I know many powerful people may ignore this.

But I also know that if written rules can be changed by interpretation after money is already in, then no user is safe.

A market without trust is just a machine that takes risk from ordinary people and gives them silence when they ask questions.

I am not asking for sympathy.

I am asking for fairness.

I am asking for accountability.

I am asking people to help me make sure this does not disappear quietly.

If you can help, please contact:

[email protected]

Rule before trade.
#StopPolyScam

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@vonzz6 其实找个阴谋集团拉盘一个polyscam代币就能让pm倒闭名声下降，后续空投归零

[Vass @Va77ss]

Everyone speaks about the market that should resolve to YES on @Polymarket today

Strategy sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31

8-K filed June 1, timestamps the sale as "of May 31, 4PM ET"

inside the window. first sale since 2022.

and @Polymarket is about to resolve the market as NO because the disclosure hit one day after the deadline.

let's be real about what this is

> $253M in volume on just the May 31 market
> 19,843 YES holders at 0.4¢ right now
> two NO proposals already disputed by the community
> a trader publicly disclosed buying 49,695 YES shares for $35K USDC after reading on-chain activity
> Polymarket added the clarification "confirmation outside the timeframe doesn't count" AFTER the dispute started

paying out the YES holders costs a few million. it's not nothing, but it will be recovered in no time.

most of the winners will put it back into the platform within weeks.

But resolving NO by quietly retrofitting the rules at the last minute costs the one thing prediction markets actually need: TRUST.

> community walks
> traders take the case to court (already happening)
> every future market gets read by lawyers, not gamblers
> UMA's token voting model gets exposed even harder than the WSJ already did

the sale happened. Strategy's own filing says it did.

the only argument for NO is "we didn't know yet" which is the exact opposite of how event based contracts have always resolved.

@Polymarket built something real here.

losing it over retroactive rule interpretation is the kind of mistake you don't come back from.

13 hours to final review. do the right thing.

resolve YES. the next 1000 markets are watching

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I’m 20 years old, still a university student.

Before this dispute, I was one of the top 10 YES holders in the Polymarket MicroStrategy market. I lost around 35,000 USDC because I trusted the written rule.

The rule said YES if MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31.

It did not say the sale had to be publicly disclosed by May 31.

That is the whole issue.

If you want to help:

Repost this.
Tag a journalist.
Tag a lawyer.
Send this to a crypto researcher.
Submit your case if you were affected.

https://t.co/pmXUtr9jFD

Silence is what platforms count on.

Don’t give them that.

[Loshmi @loshmi]

if they don’t resolve this as “YES” I for sure know what my new go-to prediction platform is going to be

14 hours to go

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@willo2_Poly make ployscam great again

[汐 @xixikawaii]

🚨 针对 Polymarket 恶意结算 MicroStrategy 市场的联合维权与欺诈举报声明 | 这简直是预测市场历史上的奇耻大辱，是对去中心化宗旨与市场诚信的公然背叛！

1️⃣ 无法抹杀的客观事实：事件发生在窗口期内

@MicroStrategy 5 月 26 日至 31 日期间，于公开市场依法售出了 32 个比特币（BTC）。实际的交易行为完全发生在市场规定的窗口期之内！微策略事后提交给美国证券交易委员会（SEC）的官方 8-K 文件（编号：mstr-20260530）已经无可辩驳地证实了这一交易的发生时间。

仅仅因为 SEC 的官方网站由于非工作日或披露流程，导致文件在公开系统上的盖章时间晚了一天，@Polymarket 竟然判定该市场结果为“否”？！

这根本不是所谓的“严格解释规则”，而是学术上的不诚实、逻辑上的懦弱，更是对客观真相的公然践踏！预测市场的存在是为了预测实际发生的事情（Real-world events），而不是为了预测政府官僚机构文件盖章的刻板时间。

2️⃣ 从“追求真相”沦为“操纵市场的赌场”

你们躲在“超出确认时间范围不算数”的文字游戏幌子下，把一个本应追求客观事实的预测平台，变成了一个可以随意曲解规则、定向收割的黑箱赌场！这种极其恶劣的结算行为，是以牺牲那些选择相信链上事实、相信 SEC 官方数据的合规用户为代价，来保护巨鲸、转嫁平台自身及庄家的风险。

这个判定不仅令人不齿，更是赤裸裸的市场操纵（Market Manipulation），它彻底摧毁了整个 Web3 预测赛道的行业信任。

3️⃣ 核心规则文本的客观铁证

让我们再次逐字审视该预测的核心条款：

“如果 MicroStrategy 在标题所示日期美国东部时间晚上 11:59 之前出售其持有的比特币，则市场结果为‘是’；否则，市场结果为‘否’。”

标的物本质： 规则清晰界定，“市场结果‘是’”的触发条件完全指向“比特币出售的时间”，而非“信息被外界确认或披露的时间”。

违约与欺诈： 无论平台如何曲解补充说明，微策略在 5 月 31 日之前完成了 32 枚比特币的抛售是不可更改的既定事实。Polymarket 违背自身设立的规则进行强制结算，已经构成了实质性的合同违约与欺诈行为。

如果 @Polymarket 拒绝通过 @UMAprotocol 预言机投票纠正这一荒谬的判决，那就彻底证明了该平台更看重自身利益与内部操作，而非市场诚实！

⚖️ 联合举报与维权艾特名单（请社区散户顶起转发！）
此举涉嫌金额巨大的金融欺诈与恶意操纵，我们正式向美国各级执法部门、金融监管机构以及行业媒体发起公开举报，要求对该市场的结算过程、是否存在内部利益输送展开彻底调查：

🇺🇸 美国联邦执法与金融监管机构：

@FBI / @FBIWFO（美国联邦调查局：涉嫌互联网欺诈与洗钱线索举报）

@NewYorkFBI（纽约联邦调查局：针对预测市场及链上欺诈的直接管辖区）

@SECGov / @SEC_Enforcement（美国证券交易委员会：微策略 8-K 文件法定披露监管方，举报平台涉嫌操控相关衍生品市场）

@CFTC（美国商品期货交易委员会：近期正严厉打击预测市场的违规交易与内幕行为，平台结算涉嫌违反《商品交易法》）

@TheJusticeDept（美国司法部：严厉打击 Web3 欺诈与操纵的核心力量）

🌐 平台方、预言机与高管：

@Polymarket / @PolymarketHQ（请正面回应规则造假与信任危机！）

@ShayneCoplan（Polymarket 创始人，你的平台正在沦为赌场，请出来面对用户！）

@UMAprotocol（预言机决议方：请所有 UMA 节点在质押投票中尊重客观事实与 SEC 文件，不要成为黑箱结算的帮凶！）

📰 权威媒体与链上维权侦探（最大化曝光）：

@ZachXBT（知名链上侦探：请求介入调查该市场是否存在内幕交易和恶意倒货）

@CoinDesk / @Cointelegraph / @crypto / @Blockworks_ / @DB_News（各大加密媒体：请曝光这起针对散户的恶意割韭菜事件！）

关联： @okx @okxchinese @binancezh @binance @heyibinance @cz_binance @star_okx @zhusu @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk @SBF_FTX

#Polymarket #UMA #MicroStrategy #MSTR #CryptoJustice #Web3维权 #SEC #CFTC #FBI

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@Yes_X_ 坚持定投到归零

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@Yes_X_ 有图有真相，图都发了还看不明白那没办法了，反正这个代币就是捆绑交易者的来回收割机

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@Yes_X_ 已经加仓sol的代币，从14m一直加仓到现在，相信加仓一直跌的代币是什么不用多说了吧，最后我将继续加仓到他归零

[@xoCC @needeverything1]

@Yes_X_ 已经加仓1wu了，确实是一直跌一直加仓，这种情况就是要归零