Only a pervert crawling out of a gutter can say something like this about a woman. Only fools like this , use reverse logic to blame a woman than try to educate n coach the males in this country to get their act straight
जिसको इस पोस्ट से दिक्कत हैं उनसे निवेदन हैं कि वो अपने घर की बहन बेटियों को ऐसे कपड़े पहनाए , जिससे थोड़ी से हवा से शरीर दिखने लगे ,
मान लो कि हम पुराने ख्यालों के हैं , हमारे यहां ऐसा नहीं चलेगा और ये हमारे लिए गलत है !
अपना ज्ञान कही और बांटो, मन करे तो बिकनी पहनो या कुछ मत पहनो ये तुम्हारे ऊपर निर्भर करता हैं।
लेकिन जो गलत हैं वो गलत हैं !
A former OpenAI researcher published a 71-page document predicting the end of human civilization by April 2027.
Then the US Vice President commented on it publicly.
Then the author revised the timeline.
The document is called AI 2027. Published April 2025 by the AI Futures Project. Written by Daniel Kokotajlo, a former OpenAI scenario planning researcher who left the company because he believed humanity's survival was not being treated as a priority along with Eli Lifland, who ranks number one on the RAND Forecasting Initiative all-time leaderboard, Thomas Larsen, founder of the Center for AI Policy, Romeo Dean from Harvard, and Scott Alexander, one of the most widely read technology bloggers in the world.
The scenario depicts very rapid progress in AI capabilities, including the development of autonomous AI systems capable of recursive self-improvement. AI 2027 presents two alternative endings: one in which international competition over advanced AI leads to catastrophic loss of human control, and another in which coordinated global action slows development and averts imminent disaster.
The mechanism is called fully autonomous coding. The argument is this.
AI systems are already assisting AI research. As models become capable enough to run their own experiments, write their own improvements, and train successor models, they enter a recursive loop, AI improving AI improving AI, that accelerates past human ability to oversee or intervene. By 2027, an exponential progression occurs where AI and research mutually reinforce each other in a virtuous circle. DEV Community
The authors do not describe this as a worst-case scenario. They describe it as their median prediction.
The document attracted immediate, intense, global attention. Technology journalists. AI researchers. Ethicists. Governments. Even US Vice President JD Vance commented publicly on the scenario. Overchat
Then, at the end of December 2025, Kokotajlo revised the timeline.
The AI Futures Project revised its forecast for superintelligent AI, concluding that the technological breakthroughs once expected by 2027 are now more likely to arrive in the early 2030s. Fully autonomous coding is taking longer than the original model predicted.
He now forecasts superintelligence arriving in 2034. He no longer knows when or whether it becomes an existential threat.
Here is what makes this story more alarming than the original document.
The most informed people on earth, the researchers who built these systems and left the organizations building them because they were worried, published a specific prediction. The world took it seriously enough that the Vice President of the United States addressed it.
Then the prediction turned out to be off by seven years.
Not because AI is less dangerous than they thought. Because it is moving differently than they modeled. The recursive loop is forming more slowly in some places and faster in others. The timeline shifted. The destination did not.
Kokotajlo expressed that he is much less concerned about things going wrong if superintelligence is developed after 2030 than before 2030. The extra time matters. More alignment research. More interpretability work. More governance frameworks. Google
The question is whether the people who could use that time are using it.
A separate peer-reviewed analysis published November 2025 examined every empirical claim in AI 2027 against the evidence from 2023 to 2025. Its conclusion: the catastrophic scenarios remain speculative hypotheses rather than demonstrated probabilities but the concentration of computational power in a small number of private companies is a present and observable risk regardless of timeline.
You do not need superintelligence for that to be a problem.
Source: Kokotajlo, Lifland, Larsen, Dean, Alexander · AI Futures Project · "AI 2027" · April 2025 ·
El Louadi · "Humanity in the Age of AI: Reassessing 2025's Existential-Risk Narratives" · arXiv:2512.04119 · November 2025
Is @UPPCLLKO the WORST electricity department in the entire country? Constant fluctuations, consistent power cuts have become normal than exceptions . Please FIX it 🙏🏻
Cc: @MinOfPower@EMofficeUP
@ananyashasau Work for a Chindi company, expect Chindiness . Been happening for decades. The base salary for entry level hasn’t changed at all in 20 years
@saurabhtop should have stuck to journalism. Such insanely unimaginable bad acting that at times it becomes insufferable .
Bro get back to journalism.
@TheLallantop
If you wish to get murdered in a 5 star environment, come to @medanta LUCKNOW. They don’t CURE u , they CHARGE u. Average Revenue per patient is d only metric n doctors r salesguys. Just managed to survive somehow tx to WRONG MEDICATION
@MoHFW_INDIA