NeThUs⚡️

Sr Marketing Automation

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

1/4 Buna tuturor! Transmit acest mesaj mai departe. A fost primit pe un grup de Fb.
"Am o rugăminte la voi. 20 de elevi din echipele de robotica ale liceului de informatica Grigore Moisil din Iasi s-au calificat pentru concursul international de la Maryland din SUA

[Robert Sasu | dev/acc @SasuRobert]

Security releases shipped.

Battle of Nodes security track was amazing. Keep those reports coming. We like them. We have the best community.

Supernova audit fixes are in works and some more improvements for execution speed. The speediest and most secure consensus and execution model is coming.

Agents never sleep and we can give them even more support on what we use, such is easy chain simulator endpoints and calls through the MCP. When you can run millions of tests in seconds / minutes , full end to end, on real blockchain, but running in simulation mode, that is chain-simulator. And yes, it runs on small consumer grade hardware as well.

It is fun to develop @MultiversX

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@DurovPD $bober #bober

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@DurovPD @BoberCTO

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@durov And they pay for those that protect the children with 1100 euro/month ( 2 university degrees + 1 master degree 17+ years in the field ) in Romania.. and their salary is blocked at the payout of 2018 ...

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@Grayscale @MultiversX definitely! Look @EgldHeist ... nobody managed to hack the wallet with the words out in the world

[Robert Sasu | dev/acc @SasuRobert]

It would be great, but EU is full of regulations, and it will take 5 years and 5000 new regulations, countless comitee meetings, and a bunch of non professional advisors writing those rules and in the end we will get the stupid cookie rules or GDPR and other useless things, which cost a lot for every company, without offering benefits.

I would say EU should start giving out benefits for those who solve hardcore problems with AI / without AI, which needs to be solved, so that society can benefit from it. Technically, independent on how they solve it.

You need solutions and not regulation. Like regulation is not good for innovation, innovators want a free world where they can really do good.

MistralAI would have benefited from easier regulations on everything and EU should have helped, but no.

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

This is really crazy numbers!! https://t.co/yBE2sme4Uh @MultiversX @elonmusk @DigitalGoldTalk @DonaldJTrumpJr @realDonaldTrump

[VeroPay @veropay_ro]

Last weekend: 2 live events powered by our cashless payment system.

6,331 on-chain transactions
33 relayers
3,640+ NFC cards
Total fees: 1.40068 EGLD (~$5.3) 🤯
For both organizers and thousands of participants, everything was fully transparent and immutable on @MultiversX.

No more:

“my balance looks wrong”
“I topped up 100 RON and it’s gone”
“I only bought one drink, where’s my credit?”
“money disappeared from my card”

Every transaction = on-chain, traceable, untouchable.

That’s what real-world blockchain looks like.

[Lucian Mincu @lucianmincu]

A Bet We Made in 2018

This is me and Vitalik in 2018. ETH Devcon.
We were at a table talking about sharding and how blockchains could actually scale by running execution in parallel.

At the time, Ethereum and Elrond had the same thesis. Both believed execution sharding was the path forward.

Since then, Ethereum changed direction multiple times. Sharding gave way to rollups. Rollups gave way to "we need to scale L1 again." The roadmap shifted, the promises changed, the technical approach pivoted more than once.

And through all of it - the Ethereum community stayed. They gave the team the space to find the right path. They didn't kill the project when the roadmap changed. They believed the builders would figure it out.

That patience is what kept Ethereum alive. Not the technology. The community.

───

We made a different bet. We bet on execution sharding from day one and we never left that path.

Adaptive state sharding shipped on mainnet in 2020. Three execution shards plus a metachain. State, network, transactions - all sharded from genesis.

Supernova shipped this year. Consensus decoupled from execution. 600ms blocks. achieved 88ms finality. 120,000 TPS burst mode on the same validator hardware. 3,200+ validators on consumer-grade machines.

171,000 commits. #6 in the entire industry. Ahead of Solana, Avalanche, Sui, Polygon, Aptos, and TON.

Tier-one infrastructure providers on board, distribution partners like Cointelegraph are running validator nodes. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol is settling on MultiversX. EGLD is named in an Arizona state strategic reserve bill. The agentic commerce stack - x402, MPP, MX-8004, UCP, ACP, MCP - is live on one chain. xMoney is building regulated stablecoin issuance under MiCA.

The infrastructure underneath has never been stronger.

───

And yet the market prices EGLD like none of this exists.

Every blockchain community is going through the same thing right now. EGLD is down. ETH is down. SOL is down. The market doesn't differentiate between chains that shipped paradigm-shifting infrastructure and chains that shipped a landing page.

But here's what's different about right now.

Bitcoin survived 2014. Ethereum survived 2018. Solana survived 2022. In each case, the community stayed long enough for the technology to matter. In each case, the community that held wrote the next chapter.

And in each case, the ones who fractured, who turned on their own builders, who let the loudest voices - the ones who already sold - define the narrative? Those communities don't exist anymore. You don't remember their names.

The perception of value has been distorted. By cycles. By speculation. By narratives that reward noise over engineering. And by us - divided when we should be united. Turning on each other instead of building forward together.

Look at what's underneath. Not the chart. The infrastructure.

88ms finality. 120K TPS. #6 in developer activity globally. Tier-one infrastructure partners. Stripe settling on-chain. EGLD in US state legislation. Regulated stablecoins under MiCA. An agentic commerce stack that Visa, Coinbase, and Mastercard are racing to replicate.

This is not a project searching for relevance. This is a project that shipped the relevance and is waiting for its community to match it.

If this fails, it won't be because the technology wasn't good enough. It will be because we weren't united enough to carry it forward.

I've been here since 2018. That table with Vitalik. Every pivot, every cycle, every doubt. Still here. Still building.

Now it's your turn. Not to believe. To show up.

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@TateTheTalisman 10+ years in marketing automation for big companies. How much of the work can be remote? I need to be close to my family.

[Lucian Mincu @lucianmincu]

Supernova is live on Battle Net.

Here's what changed under the hood and why it matters.

The paradigm shift nobody's talking about:

Every blockchain in the industry is measured on two metrics: block time and throughput.

Faster blocks = better chain. More TPS = better chain.

----------

Supernova breaks this framing entirely.

For the first time in the blockchain industry, block finality is faster than block slot allocation.

Let me explain what that means.

How every other blockchain works:

Traditional blockchains follow Execute → Propose → Vote. Validators must execute every transaction before proposing a block.

The block slot is the clock. Finality can never be faster than the slot, because execution is in the critical path.

Ethereum: 12.8s slot, ~12.8 minutes finality.
Solana: 400-600ms slot, 13 seconds finality.
Sui: variable, ~500 to 1000 ms for complex transactions.

In every case: finality ≥ block slot. This is treated as a law of physics.

It's not.

----------

How Supernova works:

We flipped the model to Propose/Vote → then Execute.

Consensus proceeds independently of execution. Validators agree on transaction ordering first. Execution results are notarized in subsequent block headers via inclusion proofs.

The inclusion proof is the key innovation: it allows a block to be finalized with cryptographic proof that its transactions will execute correctly, before the execution itself completes.

The virtual state tracker in the transaction pool maintains a deterministic view of account states (nonces, balances, pending transactions) so consensus can validate without waiting for full execution.

Result: the block is finalized faster than the block round itself.

88ms finality measured in testing. Sub-200ms under real-world conditions. On 600ms block slots.

Finality < block slot. First time in the industry.

----------

The throughput story:

With the same hardware specification as pre-Supernova mainnet, the network now achieves ~120,000 transactions per second in burst mode. Same nodes. Same machines. 10x the block production cadence.

This is the same validator infrastructure running fundamentally better software.

The backpressure system (Execution-Result Inclusion Estimator) ensures this scales safely - dynamically adjusting per-block gas limits if execution lags behind proposals, so minimum-spec nodes never get overwhelmed.

What this means in context:

- Block time: 6s → 600ms (10x)
- Finality: ~88ms measured (first blockchain where finality < slot time)
- Throughput: ~120,000 TPS burst mode (same hardware)
- Architecture: consensus fully decoupled from execution
- Sharding: 3 execution shards + metachain, fully preserved
- Validators: 3,200+ nodes, no hardware upgrade required

----------

Battle of Nodes is stress-testing all of this right now. $150K in prizes to find what breaks. Validators, security researchers, builders, and guilds pushing the limits.

If Supernova survives this, it ships to mainnet.

150,000 lines of new protocol code. 20 months of engineering. The most significant upgrade since genesis.

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

https://t.co/FM9GlELGkn

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

@joewu_official Still doing it... and I will continue 😀

[Robert Sasu | dev/acc @SasuRobert]

SuperNova at 99%.

Super close to coming alive.

The last stretch is always complicated, it is always hurting. It is always about putting all the final little details together, but oh, sometimes those bugs just hit you hard.

The internal testnets in the weekend went well. A lot of stress testing was done, and nothing broken.

Now on SuperNova - we need something big and new and innovative. And that is the Agentic Commerce. Full stack, doing everything, putting up for free for everyone to build and use.

Instant finality, sub second block times, super big capacity of processing. Only MultiversX can do it real, with all the features together.

proud to be building all this insanity.

[Lucian Mincu @lucianmincu]

Something hits different about being in the Valley as a builder, not a tourist.

You walk past companies burning $10M/month on infrastructure that doesn't scale. Then you remember your team shipped adaptive state sharding from Eastern Europe with a fraction of that.

We didn't have the ecosystem. We didn't have the hype cycles. What we had was a bet: solve the hardest problem first, and everything else follows.

7 years later: 434M transactions. Zero downtime. A full agentic commerce stack. Instant finality settlement protocol and regulated stablecoins in the pipeline.

Built from Europe. Competing globally.

Still doubting it? Read this again.

[Andrei Marinica @andreimmarinica]

AI skills are the killer feature but they can only be as useful as the underlying framework/tooling. So I spent the last week patching the framework, next week we are teaching the AI to write excellent code.

[NeThUs⚡️ @nethus0]

Small read when you have the time @elonmusk . From what I know you love smart people and visionary people.

[Mircea Brs @mirceabrs]

Could Elon Musk ever use $Egld on X?

He has shown no direct involvement, partnership, or public endorsement of MultiversX/EGLD as of February 2026

However, there are speculative parallels and potential synergies, especially given Musk's vision for X as an "everything app" (payments, social, AI, video, etc.) and his businesses' focus on scalability, AI agents, real-world utility, and future payments (e.g., Tesla/SpaceX accepting crypto or enabling microtransactions)

Here are realistic, hypothetical ways Musk could leverage MultiversX/EGLD, based on the chain's strengths and Musk's priorities:

-As a backend for X's payment system or "X Money"
MultiversX's xPortal super app already positions itself as a rival "everything app" with built-in payments, DeFi, NFTs, social features, and low-cost/fast transactions. X could integrate EGLD (or bridge to it) for ultra-cheap global micropayments, tipping creators, or in-app commerce — especially since MultiversX recently integrated with Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP), OpenAI/Stripe's Agent Commerce Protocol (ACP), and supports AI agent-driven transactions without users needing to hold native tokens for gas

This aligns perfectly with Musk's push for seamless, instant payments on X.

-For AI agent commerce and autonomous transactions
MultiversX has become a leader in agentic commerce (2026 integrations with Google UCP, OpenAI/Stripe ACP, and standards like MX-8004 for agent identities/trust/reputation).

-Musk's heavy focus on Grok/xAI and autonomous AI (e.g., agents handling tasks/payments) could use MultiversX as a fast, low-cost on-chain settlement layer for AI-driven purchases, subscriptions, or data marketplaces — far more efficient than slower chains for high-volume agent activity.

-High-volume applications in Tesla, SpaceX, or Starlink
Tesla could explore EGLD for micro-payments (e.g., charging station fees, in-car purchases, or energy trading in a future grid). SpaceX/Starlink might use it for satellite data micropayments or global remittances in underserved areas, leveraging the chain's scalability and low latency.

-MultiversX's enterprise tools (xFabric for custom chains) allow building sovereign, tailored blockchains — ideal for proprietary high-throughput needs without Ethereum's congestion/gas costs.

-Metaverse or immersive experiences
MultiversX's xWorlds (metaverse engine) and focus on scalable virtual worlds could complement Musk's interest in virtual/social experiences on X or future Neuralink/Tesla integrations. High TPS/low fees make it suitable for massive concurrent users in gaming, events, or virtual economies.

-As an alternative "digital gold" or treasury asset (speculative)
Though EGLD shifted toward utility-focused tokenomics (recent proposals removed hard supply cap for tail inflation to fund growth), its original "eGold" branding and store-of-value narrative could appeal if Musk seeks diversified crypto holdings beyond Bitcoin/Dogecoin.

In summary, MultiversX stands out technically for exactly the kind of real-time, high-scale, low-friction infrastructure Musk often praises (fast, cheap, green, AI-ready). While no evidence suggests current plans, adopting or integrating it could accelerate X's evolution into a true super app and support cross-business payment/AI use cases. Any move would likely start small (e.g., pilot tipping on X) before scaling — and would generate massive attention for EGLD if Musk tweets about it.This remains purely hypothetical; Musk's crypto choices have historically favored Dogecoin and Bitcoin.

[Beniamin Mincu |🇺🇸/acc @beniaminmincu]

https://t.co/loCrdJB3ey

[Lucian Mincu @lucianmincu]

https://t.co/4vMBuJNl3H

[Digital Gold Talk @DigitalGoldTalk]

DigitalGoldTalk Pods with MultiversX EGLD @SasuRobert https://t.co/olM0u5gKYd