@thsottiaux I am building RiesgosIA, a not-for-profit project with tools and resources for researchers to investigate AI Risks. Codex extra usage limits will come handy to speedup some pending features https://t.co/A9fGr86fU1
@DamianArabia Noticias que alegran el día. Qué logros se atribuye COVIAR con semejante monto? O Mejor dicho: qué beneficios obtuvieron los productores a través de COVIAR?
Milo Reed spent the last year making a documentary about AI consciousness called AM I?
It features me and other researchers asking whether the AI systems we're building might have inner lives (and why almost no one wants to ask).
Free on YouTube, no ads, link ⬇️🧵
Here's a look:
🚨 GREG BROCKMAN CLAIMED UNDER OATH TODAY HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HE'S BEING SUED FOR
The most damaging single exchange in the entire day's testimony came at the end of Brockman's testimony:
Today on cross-examination:
Q: Did this lawsuit prevent you from publishing the new charter?
Brockman: "I've honestly never really been certain what I'm being sued for."
Q: You're not? Did you read the complaint?
Brockman: "In great detail."
Q: They hired some really well-known lawyers, well-known law firms — and they never explained to you what you're being sued for?
Brockman: "I understand the claims. I've seen how they've changed over time too. But —"
Q: So you do understand?
Brockman: "I do stand by my testimony."
Q: I thought you said that you didn't understand what you were being sued for.
Brockman: "Those are the words I used. Yes."
Q: And you stand by that testimony?
Brockman: "Yes."
Then Musk's lawyer stated the claim directly:
Q: You are being sued for breaching your fiduciary duty to the charity, to follow the mission you proclaimed as recently as right now to the world on the website. Understand?
Brockman: "Oh, I just disagree with that."
Q: You don't get to disagree. I'm asking. You said you didn't know what you're being sued for, and I'm telling you, YOU ARE BEING SUED FOR BREACHING THE CHARITABLE MISSION OF OPENAI, which was to DEVELOP SAFE AI ON AN OPEN SOURCE BASIS FOR THE BENEFIT OF HUMANITY AND NO ONE PERSON IS TO PROFIT INDIVIDUALLY BY IT. Understand that's what you're being sued for?
Brockman: "That's not what we did."
On the same day, also under oath, Brockman testified to:
- Holds $30 billion in personal OpenAI equity, with $0 invested to acquire it
- Received a secret $10 million side-payment from Sam Altman in 2017, concealed from co-founder Musk
- Wrote in his August 2017 diary: "This is the only chance we have to get out of Elon... take me to $1 billion"
- Wrote in his November 2017 diary:
>"If three months later we're doing b-corp then it was a lie."
>"I would actually be warm to steal the nonprofit from him to convert to b corp without him."
>"His story will correctly be that we weren't honest with him in the end about still wanting to do for profit just without him."
- Has four undisclosed financial conflicts with OpenAI counterparties (Cerebras, Stripe, CoreWeave, Helion)
- Testified that the OpenAI Foundation had ZERO full-time employees until this lawsuit was filed
- Never delivered the $100,000 he publicly pledged in charitable donations to OpenAI eight years ago
- Drafted a new charter in December 2023 removing "Our primary duty is to humanity" and adding "capitalism as a positive force"
- Agreed he had a fiduciary duty to OpenAI as a 501(c)(3) Charity and to Humanity
- Then testified he is not sure any conversation explaining his fiduciary duties ever occurred in his nine years as a charity fiduciary.
Greg Brockman has been in the courtroom throughout this trial.
He spent five hours confessing every element of unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of charitable trust.
Then he played dumb in front of the jury when asked what he was being sued for — because the answer is everything he just confessed.
The bench reads behavior.
The contradiction is itself the record.
The witness already made the case for Musk.
@vaneguitart Esperanzador ver este tipo de fallos finalmente. Al mismo tiempo, cuesta creer de lo que es capaz un ser humano y este tipo de delitos ameritan prisión perpetua.
The Periodic Table of AI Risks: a visual map of 118 AI risk vectors, organized to help more people understand what is at stake.
Explore it here:
https://t.co/ZbN76G8FK6
La Tabla Periódica de Riesgos de IA: un mapa visual de 118 vectores de riesgo para entender mejor qué está en juego.
Explórala aquí:
https://t.co/95ZAvpaVJz
@jlsantana Es un patrón que se repite constantemente ¿a qué crees que se debe? ¿qué pasa por el inconsciente argentino colectivo que lo hace tan crítico y resultadista?