I will support data centers in exchange for all of the following:
- every employee who works at the data center must be at least a 3rd-generation American citizen, no exceptions
- any county a data center goes into gets at least 50% property tax reduction, and each household gets a minimum of $1,000/mo utilities credits to be used for electricity and water bills (all paid for by the tech company that owns the data center); this stays in effect as long as the data center remains operational
- the tech company that owns the data center must commit a minimum of $15M to the development of a recreational park that offers fishing, walking trails, and play structures for the county’s residents
Just moments ago, I submitted another query to the National Guard Bureau regarding the Colonel Leslie Zyzda-Martin case: according to sources, on or around February 2026, there was a Commander-Directed Investigation (CDI) into the circumstances surrounding Colonel Zyzda-Martin’s 2021 removal. This CDI was overseen by BG Bart Van Roo and concluded on or around May 2026.
However, the findings have not been made public, nor been availed to Colonel Zyzda-Martin herself.
Here’s what I want to know: When will the findings, which have significant professional ramifications for Colonel Zyzda-Martin, be released?
If there is a report of investigation that exonerates Colonel Zyzda-Martin, then it sadly demonstrates the hypocrisy of how the WI ANG does business — with break-neck speed, they published news of her removal on the AP Wire one day after her firing, but a report that could clear her name is locked down for months without release to either the public or Colonel Zyzda-Martin herself. If an independent investigation did exonerate her and is not being released, it further shows that the state’s priority is not justice for its officer, but damage control for its leadership, current and former.
@Zota24032437@walk_the_talk94@PeteHegseth@SecWar@realDonaldTrump@POTUS@SECAFOfficial@matthewlohmeier@ChiefNGB@GovEvers@USW_PR_HONTata@ajtata@RobManess
The fact that EVERY GOFO who had the power to stop it PERMITTED the bacha bazi rape of little boys and ORDERED their subordinates to permit it on American bases is downright disgusting.
It was the moment that story came out and we did nothing about it that we, as a @DeptofWar sold our soul.
When stuff like that is permitted to co-exist with our men and women, stuff like COVID and Abbey Gate are inevitable... and without meaningful accountability, more avoidable tragedies will continue to happen.
If you’re one of the people zooming in on Lance Corporal Jordan Houston’s uniform looking for everything wrong after he received the Bronze Star with Valor:
FUCK YOU.
You don’t get to preach about veteran suicide, mental health, brotherhood, and taking care of our own while publicly tearing one of our own apart.
I know what that feels like.
I’m not looking at his uniform. I’m looking at the Marine wearing it.
To me, Houston is a brother and a hero. I’m proud to wear the same uniform as him. If he needs help climbing this mountain, I’ll stand next to him the entire way.
Reach a hand out instead of kicking a man while he’s down.
Be the example.
By the way we’re now two weeks into no ac at @USArmy_FtCarson. No relocation assistance to the Soldiers or temporary units put in place.
My proposal is have the leaders move into the barracks until the AC is fixed.
Sentiment shared by retired Marine Sgt. Maj. Brad Kasal, a Navy Cross recipient, regarding the critics nitpicking uniform display at the recent Bronze Star/Abbey Gate ceremony. Spot on
🚨🚨@SecWar , @PeteHegseth My THIRD notice on ABCMR case AR20250003642 was delivered to your office 26 AUG 2026. 🇺🇸🇺🇸
NGB now acknowledges I can receive reinstatement relief — just not through the Maine Army National Guard. NGB says I can go to the Army Reserve, where my ABCMR becomes directive, or transfer to another State's National Guard.
Yet NGB says reinstatement in Maine remains at the Maine TAG's discretion.
How can the Maine TAG effectively deny implementation of POTUS EO 14184, while NGB acknowledges the relief can be implemented everywhere except Maine?
Who has the final authority?
@JMPhelpsLC
@RealChapAmerica Maybe just maybe if we stopped keeping gems like this as conventional wisdom, we could have a military that was efficient and effective instead of bloated and full of red tape
@RealChapAmerica Do what your boss want turns the boss into someone who doesn’t know how to be corrected. Compounded by time we get a culture that allows the mass poisioning of the troops because “that’s what the boss said”
@thsottiaux At least be intellectually honest about why you’re doing this: it’s more profitable. The 5 hour limits throttles work and reduces the amount of times the user uses their entire weekly limit. Don’t give us nonsense about users being confused
@DOWResponse@SecWar The bureaucracy seems to be winning in regards to the Covid reconciliation. Evidence being the members of my correction board felt empowered to rule my active duty service didn’t qualify me as a service member covered by the COVID guidance and deny my reconciliation case
@DOWResponse@SecWar I'm at WAR with the bureaucracy too, its called the National Guard Bureau and the Maine Army National Guard they refuse to reinstate me per EO 14184 and ABCMR case # AR20250003642 https://t.co/XYxvDuybXL
Two Points:
1. Countries will just funnel the money through PACs, they likely already are.
2. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act lifted the ban on domestic dissemination in 2013. That is the crux of the issue. Start there.
🚨🚨@SecWar@PeteHegseth — Three appeals. Each time, NGB concedes a little more. One question remains unanswered.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
27 JAN 2025: President Trump issues EO 14184 to restore Service Members harmed by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
13 JUN 2025: ABCMR case AR20250003642 finds by a preponderance of the evidence that an injustice occurred and grants corrective relief. https://t.co/zQZeYcfeLb
29 JUL 2025: ARBA transmits the approved Record of Proceedings for corrective action.
6 AUG 2025: ARBA describes my favorable ABCMR decision as correcting my records to show my:
“contingent reassession into full time status with the Maine Army National Guard in accordance with provisions under Executive Order 14184.”
Then began my appeals directly to Secretary Hegseth.
FIRST APPEAL — 25 NOV 2025
I asked Secretary Hegseth to intervene because NGB and MEARNG still had not implemented my ABCMR restoration.
NGB's 6 JAN 2026 response took a categorical position:
“The ABCMR decision is not directive in nature but a recommendation to the Adjutant General of the Maine National Guard.”
SECOND APPEAL — 20 JUL 2026
I again asked Secretary Hegseth to examine my case—this time specifically identifying AR20250003642 as a ground-zero example of the “Roadblocks and Impediments to Reinstatement.”
NGB responded again on 17 AUG 2026.
But its position moved.
NGB now acknowledges that if I transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve:
“the Board's determination shifts from a recommendation to a directive, ensuring you receive all relief the Board granted.”
That is a significant concession.
NGB has now acknowledged that my ABCMR determination can be directive and can ensure that I receive the relief granted by the Board.
Yet NGB simultaneously maintains that implementation through the Maine Army National Guard:
“remains at the discretion of the TAG and the Governor of Maine.”
So we have arrived at the central question:
Does NGB really believe a State TAG has discretion to prevent implementation of restorative relief arising from President Trump's EO 14184, while the exact same ABCMR determination becomes directive if implemented through another Army Reserve Component?
THIRD APPEAL — dated 22 AUG 2026 / sent 24 AUG 2026
I have now placed that precise question before Secretary Hegseth.
The Department's 1 APR 2025 policy applies to the Active and Reserve Components and identifies the Service Member's acceptance of reinstatement as the contingency.
I accepted reinstatement on 31 AUG 2025.
NGB has instead substituted the Maine TAG's acceptance for mine.
Mr. Secretary, after three appeals, the issue has become remarkably simple:
Who has the final word over implementation of EO 14184 corrective relief—the President and his Secretary of War, or the Maine TAG?
If NGB believes Title 32 gives the Maine TAG that veto, it should identify the statute, regulation, or Department policy that says so.
Three appeals. Three progressively narrower NGB positions. Still no citation to that authority.
AR20250003642.
Gather around, it’s story time. Today’s lesson: on the spot corrections in uniform.
When I was in basic training at Fort Benning, GA, we received a day pass to go to the store on base. You have to understand, this was a big deal. We had to wear a uniform and everyone there would know we were in basic based off of haircuts and lack of patches (back then you didn’t get any unit patch, not even the generic “Army” one).
So, big and tall, I walked into The Exchange and was IMMEDIATELY swarmed by NCO‘s yelling at me. They kept screaming at me to correct myself (they used a different term) but here is the thing…I had no idea what was wrong.
Finally a senior NCO walked up to me calmly, and asked me if I had any idea what was going on.
I did not.
He looked at me, and told me to take my sunglasses off the top of my head. Then he simply walked away.
You don’t wear sunglasses in basic. I had no idea it was a rule. Once he realized I had no idea why I was wrong, he quickly made a correction and went about his day.
I think about that story a lot when I decide how I want to make a correction.