Daniel Cormier called out Gable Steveson for being a sore loser ๐ณ
โYou let that man get his hand raised, and you stand there no matter how you feel.
If youโre concussed, cry. I did it.โ
I've been trialing different carb sources to find what's best for me for performance, fullness, pumps.
This week was oats with every meal.
So far nothing beats potatoes. Something about potatoes just makes me pop.
An outburst of anger raises your risk of a heart attack by 8.5 times in the two hours that follow it. A 2014 meta-analysis in the European Heart Journal pooled data from nine studies and found that the window after an episode of intense anger is one of the most dangerous periods for the cardiovascular system.
The study was led by Elizabeth Mostofsky at the Harvard School of Public Health. She found that the risk of heart attack was 8.5 times higher, the risk of stroke was 3.6 times higher, and the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm was 9.5 times higher in the two hours after an angry outburst compared to a calm baseline.
The mechanism is a surge of adrenaline and cortisol that raises heart rate, spikes blood pressure, constricts blood vessels, and makes the blood more likely to clot. In a healthy artery this is survivable. In an artery already narrowed by fatty buildup, the surge can dislodge a piece of plaque and trigger a blockage. The anger does not cause the disease. It triggers the event in a body where the disease is already sitting.
The risk was highest for people who were already at cardiovascular risk: smokers, people with high blood pressure, and people with existing heart disease. For a healthy 30-year-old, the absolute risk is still very low even at 8.5 times baseline. For a 55-year-old man with high blood pressure who has not been to a doctor in five years, the same burst of rage is a different proposition.
The two-hour window is the finding. The anger ends, the body takes two hours to come down, and during those two hours the cardiovascular system is running hot in a way that can be measured and, in some cases, can kill. https://t.co/diEq58VvGl
Jacob is correct hereโwe really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
Weโre sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.
The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.
The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
With AlphaFold we mapped the protein universe - now with AlphaGenome Atlas weโre charting the human genome. It can predict the impact of all 9 billion possible single-letter DNA variants, helping scientists better understand disease. Freely available for academic research: https://t.co/Gsy6lW3z6O
Based on public trial evidence, the methodical timing of the husband's errand, sequential choices of method and order, and concealment of thoughts from providers show she retained substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness and control her actions under Massachusetts law. I would find her criminally responsible and guilty of first-degree murder on each count.