a lot of unhelpful advice takes the form of "did you try turning into the kind of person that would not have that problem"
because for many, being the person that they are is more important than solving the problem. ppl want to be themselves more than they want to be happy
Apa ya ... ya tentu saja kadang gw “nganut” Natthikavāda, meskipun cuma dalam beberapa mind-moments ... despite gw paham secara teoritis 6 jenis diṭṭhi dari 6 añña-titthiyā :) Begitu juga somehow Ucchedavāda dan Akiriyavāda dan vāda-vāda dari diṭṭhi lain :)
everyone talks about how to meditate but no one talks about how there’s actually a lot of prerequisites to even be able to sit down quietly in the first place w/o feeling an extreme need to actively numb yourself with an external coping mech like phone or food or romance or work
everyone talks about how to meditate but no one talks about how there’s actually a lot of prerequisites to even be able to sit down quietly in the first place w/o feeling an extreme need to actively numb yourself with an external coping mech like phone or food or romance or work
kayak yauda sih orang mau tetep hidup atau milih buat mati segera juga ya yaudah kalau itu jadi keputusan ranah nilainya gak sih ... (ini "orang"-nya itu gw maksudnya) kenapa gw harus nganut pandangan bahwa gw sendiri harus tetap eksis berjalan sebagai kesatuan gugusan ini ...
sebenernya to live or to die itu masalah nilai aja ga sih kayak kenapa gw harus memegang nilai bahwa gw harus tetap bertahan hidup? why not mengubah values tersebut?
even to die juga, misal diartiin sebagai menonaktifkan sesuatu yang conscious, tapi toh definisi apa itu conscious or consciousness juga masih jadi perdebatan di sana-sini, yang sulit di-figure out apa maksudnya pula