Eg: CHEIF JUSTICE - SURYA KANT CALLED UNEMPLOYED YOUTH- COCKROACHES.
HE DISMISSED LAWYERS ARGUING AGAINST THE POLICE BRUTALITY CALLING THEM USELESS ALLEGATIONS AND STOP WASTING HIS TIME.
Your time is to do right to society, not speak outrageous things just because you are CJI.
🇺🇸 One thing I admire about their mature judicial systems is that judges often project restraint,even in difficult cases.
🇮🇳 In India, when judges make dismissive or insulting remarks about citizens, it weakens public confidence
Authority commands respect. Humility sustains it.
@asheesh0501 You just listed excuses, not arguments.
MCC, staff deployment and security are administrative hurdles—not reasons to keep politicians insulated for five years.
If a government fears facing voters after just two years, perhaps it doesn’t deserve five.
The ongoing protests in India 🇮🇳 made me think about one question.
What if politicians had to face the people every 2 years instead of every 5?
Imagine governing with the knowledge that your report card is due in just 104 weeks—not 260.
Would our politics look very different?
And yes, that also gives corrupt politicians more time to get richer, more powerful, and more deeply entrenched before voters get another chance to remove them.
The world’s biggest democracy shouldn’t fear asking its leaders to face the people more often.
The Election Commission spent around ₹10–12k crore on the 2024 Lok Sabha election. Spread over five years, that’s just ₹2k–2.4k crore per year.
Meanwhile, governments collect thousands of crores every year just by conducting national entrance and recruitment exams.
We also keep paying GST and other taxes year after year.
So don’t tell me it’s about the money.
It’s about a system that lets politicians—honest or corrupt—sit comfortably for five years with minimal electoral accountability.
@Ericreed94 And yes, that also gives corrupt politicians more time to get richer, more powerful, and more deeply entrenched before voters get another chance to remove them.
The world’s biggest democracy shouldn’t fear asking its leaders to face the people more often.
@Ericreed94 We also keep paying GST and other taxes year after year.
So don’t tell me it’s about the money.
It’s about a system that lets politicians—honest or corrupt—sit comfortably for five years with minimal electoral accountability.
@pubity The ongoing protests in India 🇮🇳 made me think about one question.
What if politicians had to face the people every 2 years instead of every 5?
Imagine governing with the knowledge that your report card is due in just 104 weeks—not 260.
Would our politics look very different?
India is the world’s largest democracy.
The world’s largest democracy must face relentless accountability between elections.
Democracy doesn’t end on election day—it demands constant pressure on elected leaders until the next one.
2-year elections wouldn’t magically end corruption.
They wouldn’t guarantee good governance either.
But they would make it much harder for any government to ignore public sentiment for years at a time.
The ongoing protests in India 🇮🇳 made me think about one question.
What if politicians had to face the people every 2 years instead of every 5?
Imagine governing with the knowledge that your report card is due in just 104 weeks—not 260.
Would our politics look very different?
The U.S. elects its House of Representatives every 2 years. The Philippines holds national elections every 3 years.
Maybe the real question isn’t “Can India afford more elections?”
Maybe it’s “Can India afford less accountability?”
@MadridXtra Bro didn’t even register g/a the whole tournament.
And please don’t bring “it’s not all about g/a in football argument” he sucked ass in group stages btw & cucurella played better than him throughout the tournament 😂
People pushing for Rodri ballon’dor is how i know they know nothing about how this sport works.
They must be those new glory hunting fanbase or retarded ass fucks.
Lamine will win the b’dor.Period.