Ah, there it is. The reason why there were 13 in favour is because the Court drafted a cryptic text that allowed Nolte and Aurescu to join, but interpreting the text in a restrictive fashion, alongside the line of Barak and Sebutinde, the dissenters. I read this as a 11 to 4 then
Halt: The International Court of Justice and the Rafah Offensive
@AdHaque110 writes on the meaning of the Court’s Order for IDF military operations in Rafah.
#ICJ#IsraelHamasWar#ICJGenocideConvention
https://t.co/0budfrVEVJ
READ HERE: the full text of the #ICJ Order on the request of South Africa of 10 May 2024 for the modification of the Order of 28 March 2024 in the case #SouthAfrica v. #Israel https://t.co/UsCPbP9ozw
PRESS RELEASE: tomorrow at 3 p.m. (The Hague), the #ICJ will deliver its Order on the request for the modification & the indication of provisional measures submitted by South Africa on 10 May 2024 in the case #SouthAfrica v. #Israel. Watch live on @UNWebTV https://t.co/qUl9vfKR8D
WATCH LIVE: the #ICJ delivers its Order on the request of South Africa of 10 May 2024 for the indication of additional provisional measures and the modification of previous provisional measures in the case #SouthAfrica v. #Israel https://t.co/Yq7pgg3kNe
REMINDER: the #ICJ will deliver its Order on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Mexico in the case of the Embassy of Mexico in Quito (#Mexico v. #Ecuador) tomorrow, Thursday 23 May, at 3 p.m. (The Hague). Watch on @UNWebTV https://t.co/IMbHtGtiK1