njo

[Andy @PositivFuturist]

What’s crazy about this story is that it’s the publicly visible tip of the iceberg - this is one of the only cases the BBC actually reporting on as its one of the only cases to go through the courts.

This was the governments chance to knee-jerk against the whole “grooming gang” affair and prove that two tier justice isn’t real.

The result? He’ll continue to live in Britain at huge expense to the taxpayer because of his human rights.

That’s the best they could do.

https://t.co/Mf4aIyPOIr

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

This is the same Rochdale rape gang ringleader who disrupted his own trial by tearing his shirt off and accusing the court of a racist conspiracy against conspiracy against Pakistanis — "the supreme race, not these white bastards."

He denied all charges, then smiled when he was sentenced.

These people believe any punishment for abusing our children is unjust. They only care about the collective advantage conferred to Pakistani clans.

He will not be a pariah. He will be welcomed back into his community when released.

He should never have been here in the first place.

He should have been deported in 2018, under Home Secretary Sajid Javid, a Pakistani man born in Rochdale. But he decided not to strip the four perpetrators of their British citizenship and arrange for their removal to Pakistan, despite a court ruling it lawful.

We shouldn't have to live like this.

End all immigration from Pakistan. Deport the communities who produce these predators, know about their crimes, and cover them up.

Deportation is too good for perpetrators like Ahmed. Whole life sentences should be the minimum, if not the death penalty.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

So you're allowing universities and charities, already subsidised by our taxes, to "sponsor" people from third-world countries as "asylum seekers", who then get an additional payment via our taxes to support them.

Then those same "asylum seekers" have to pay for that support while having access to the benefits system — so, they're repaying it using our taxes.

We don't want this. We shouldn't be paying for this. None of these people should be in our country. We see exactly what you are doing.

[Firas Modad @firasmodad]

They're dispersing the migrants in the shires to ensure they can't be eventually rounded up and placed in camps.

They want this to be permanent. They want every corner of England to be unsafe. They hate you.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The BBC has issued an official explanation on why it has failed to cover our rape gang inquiry.

'Complex choices' are made for editorial and practical reasons.

These choices 'should not be taken as indicative of bias.'

Their words.

But the BBC were very quick to cover malicious complaints against our inquiry, in an attempt to smear our efforts? They were then forced to later apologise about how they covered the story.

So either the inquiry is worth reporting on, or it's not.

They can't pick and choose.

We're told 'complex choices' are made, meaning that efforts to uncover the industrial rape of young girls is not near the top of list.

Let's take a look at a few stories on the main BBC news page, right now...

'Osaka pays 'love and respect to Japan' in Wimbledon kimono'

'Why £15 durians are being sold at half price - or given away for free'

'We had packed lunches every day for 10 years and retired at 40'

Are these stories more important than the rape gang inquiry?

I think not.

You cannot hate the BBC enough.

I expect no fair coverage from them, I've stopped expecting it.

But the BBC is funded by the British people.

Their continued suppression of our inquiry is a disgrace.

[welshman @welshmaan]

It's mental to think that in less than 30 days we've seen an attempted b#heading, countless teenagers st#bbed and raped, a Somalian car flatten 5 people, and a baby r#ped to death, all a result of immigration.

I don't remember British summertimes ever being like this before.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

It is not a virtue to pretend that anyone from anywhere can self-identity as a member of our national family, while every other nation refuses to indulge such a suicidal fantasy.

I don't care what makes Michael Gove feel like a good person. I care about preventing my children from being a mistreated minority in their only country. Patting ourselves on the back for being welcoming to people who are not like us will not do that.

[The Nowhere Photographer @thenowherephoto]

French authorities: complicit in the illegal migrant crossings?

Example 1: Officers guide and organise buses transporting migrants to the beaches.

Example 2: Police vehicles escort or follow the buses, with officers also travelling on board.

Example 3: On Dunkirk beach, officers stand by as migrants make their way to the water, with no apparent attempts to apprehend or prevent departures.

These are the scenes I have documented.

At what point do people decide the evidence deserves serious scrutiny?

Watch the footage. Draw your own conclusions.

#IllegalMigration #ChannelCrossings #Dunkirk #France #UKBorder #BorderSecurity #Migration #BreakingNews #Journalism #DocumentaryPhotography #TheNowherePhotographer

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I have invited all MPs to sign this open letter to the Home Secretary opposing Labour's plan to import thousands more 'refugees' through legal routes.

All MPs who sign are pledging to legislate to deport anyone who has arrived using these new routes.

We must draw a line NOW.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

They Called It Replacement Migration In 2001. In 2026 Mahmood Is Delivering It Into Your Home

In 2001 the United Nations Population Division published a report titled Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? It was not a secret document. It is on the UN's own website. It examined whether mass immigration could offset demographic decline in ageing Western nations and calculated, in its most extreme scenario, that the European Union would require 674 million net migrants between 1995 and 2050, at an average of 13 million per year, to maintain worker-to-retiree ratios at 1995 levels. The report's own authors and subsequent academic literature acknowledged those numbers were not practically achievable. What the report did was establish mass immigration as the primary policy tool for managing an ageing population. That framing has never been withdrawn.

In 2015 Britain signed the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Its target 10.7 commits signatory nations to facilitating orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration. In 2018 the Marrakech Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, adopted by 152 countries including Britain, normalised mass immigration as the standing policy response to demographic decline. Most people have never heard of the Teal Book. They should. It is the British government's own project delivery guidance, and it states explicitly that British equality, diversity and inclusion policy is governed by the UN's 2030 Agenda.

The line from 2001 to 2026 is unbroken. Each document builds on the last. Each commits signatory governments more specifically to the same direction. And each was adopted without a referendum, without a manifesto commitment, and without the public being told what was being signed in their name.

This week Shabana Mahmood announced the Community Sponsorship Scheme. Under the scheme, British families, community groups, employers and universities will sponsor refugees directly, committing to support their financial, emotional and settlement needs for the first year. Refugees will be referred by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The nationalities prioritised are Sudanese and Eritrean nationals, chosen specifically because they currently represent some of the largest groups crossing the Channel illegally. Mahmood described community sponsorship as the new norm for refugees entering Britain.

The 2001 UN report identified the problem. The 2015 Agenda committed governments to address it through migration. The 2018 Marrakech compact normalised that commitment. The Teal Book embedded it in British institutional policy. And in 2026 the Home Secretary is asking British families to provide the infrastructure.

Each step was presented as a separate, unconnected policy decision. The timeline says otherwise. The framing has been consistent for twenty-five years. The delivery mechanism has simply become more direct.

And then there are the boats. Over 200,000 people have crossed the Channel illegally since 2018. The removal rate is four percent. Accommodation contracts are signed until 2039. Twelve new asylum centres opened this week without informing MPs. The community sponsorship scheme creates a parallel legal pipeline for the same nationalities currently crossing illegally. Every tough speech, every announced crackdown, every promise to "smash the gangs" has been followed by more arrivals, more contracts and more infrastructure.

The boats are not a crisis the government is failing to solve. They are a delivery mechanism it has spent twenty-five years building the infrastructure to receive. The rhetoric exists to manage public anger. The contracts, the centres and the sponsorship scheme exist to manage the arrivals. Both serve the same purpose. One is for public consumption. The other is the policy.

[Integral Views @Integral_Views]

I am furious about this to a degree that it's hard to express.

This is important.

Shabana Mahmood is laying out plans for more asylum seekers to come to the UK using a 'Community Sponsorship Scheme' but very few people know what this entails.

I am so angry not just for the reasons that are clearly obvious to everyone but also due to the fact that this was all laid out in the Fabian Society's publication 'Lawful & Fair' in June 2023. Keep in mind that almost our entire cabinet are Fabians including Shabana.

It says: '“In addition, the UK should create a single ‘community welcome’ route to enable communities to sponsor refugees. The UK Refugee Service would be responsible for administering a single, uncapped, additional, sponsorship route. This community welcome route would allow citizen groups (including faith, charity and community groups as well as universities and employers) to sponsor refugees, building on existing schemes including the community sponsorship scheme and the Homes for Ukraine scheme, but not restricted to any particular nationality. Sponsorship also has the benefit of injecting community voice into the system and improves integration outcomes.”

This means that, for example, Mosques could make use of that uncapped sponsorship route to bring in as many 'asylum seekers' as they choose to sponsor. No doubt with shady foreign funding. Then the government would call that 'integration' because they had integrated into the Muslim 'community'.

And it says:

“A community-based welcome strategy would fit and move in lockstep with a new national refugee policy (for example, requiring a minimum level of refugee resettlement in all local authorities) and with a single community welcome sponsorship scheme for all nationalities, as outlined above, but encompassing all new arrivals.”

Got that? 'A minimum level of refugee resettlement in all local authorities'.

The document also makes the case for:
- The right to work for all asylum seekers after 6 months
- Making all kinds of migrants including asylum seekers British Citizens as soon as possible
- Building an industry out of asylum seeking within a 'UK Refugee Service' with 1,000 staff
- An online portal for applications from Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc
- Speeding up approvals and blanket approving claims from certain countries

What this means, as is so clearly obvious to us all is that this government, from before its first day in office has been following a playbook that has been decades in the making.

They are not listening. They are not reacting to events or changing course based on evidence. They are locked in and utterly convinced of their righteousness. They simply do not care what you think or what evidence exists.

This is echo chamber thinking at its worst. Groups convincing themselves that they are correct and then gradually, collectively working their way into positions of leadership in order implement their master plan.

I covered this 'Lawful & Fair' document in quite some detail in a youtube video last year. I'll link that in the comments.

The Fabian Society is not just a think tank. It's a network. A belief system. A cult.

This will be looked back on and studied in the future as a political disaster of civilisational proportions. That's if it's us that get to write the history books.

I'm utterly disgusted by what our political system has produced. Tone deaf, ill informed, philosophically infantile, economically illiterate, virtue signaling dim wits.

[Adam Wren @aswren]

With chain migration still in place this is apocalyptic. We’re getting close to the endgame now

[The Telegraph @Telegraph]

Denmark’s immigration minister has announced plans to ban the Islamic call to prayer, claiming parts of the country felt like “a suburb of Islamabad”.

🔗: https://t.co/hY98FiF1fD

[Paul Powlesland @paulpowlesland]

Dear @EnvAgency.

In February this year, after 4 years of asking you to look after the Aldersbrook, I led a team of volunteers to do your job for you & clean out tonnes of silt & leaves, as well as hundreds of bags of rubbish. Through the effort of community volunteers & donations, & at zero cost to the taxpayer, we turned a forgotten silted up ditch back into a river again.

Last nights intense rain storm showed why our actions are the very definition of “strengthening water resilience”. A huge amount of rain fell in a short time, but the restored section of the Aldersbrook has been able to hold 100’s of thousands of litres more water, stopping this water running into the Roding, & thereby *reducing* local flood risk. The first photograph below is of the Aldersbrook after the rains this morning- a big contrast to the area before we did the work.

Perhaps more importantly, this water, instead of running straight off into the Roding & hence the sea is now being held in the Aldersbrook & gradually released so it can be used by nature. It is feeding marshes, trees & wildlife, topping up groundwater & helping to reduce our flood/drought cycle. If you want to strengthen water resilience, we need thousands more projects like the Aldersbrook around the country.

So the question I ask you, Environment Agency, is why you are threatening me with two years imprisonment, rather than offering to meet & discuss how we can work together to restore the Roding & its tributaries, which could become a blueprint for you cooperating with local river guardians nationwide?

[Western Exile @westernexile]

Maturing is realising that absolutely nothing of substance is happening here.

A false pressure valve is being released, to reset public anger so as to buy additional years of time to implement an agenda that was decided long ago, elsewhere. The frontman is utterly expendable.

[Aldo Sterone @AldoSterone111]

Le prochain premier ministre britannique va commencer par aller voir le roi, c’est la tradition. Par la suite, il ira rencontrer Zelinsky pour lui prêter allégeance. Puis, il va appeler Van der Layen pour confirmer sa vassalité à l’UE. Enfin, il mangera avec des patrons de hedge funds avant de venir à la television nous parler de climat.

[Lotuseaters.com @lotuseaters_com]

Like it's Lenin being sent back into Russia.

Who do these people think Burnham is?

[Pete North @FUDdaily]

If I were in charge of Restore Britain right now, I would publish a statement along the lines of this:

In a recent interview, Rupert Lowe has made it clear that he detests ethno-nationalism and neo-Nazism. Those who want to steer the party in that direction have no future in it. The party, in essence, is a National Conservative party that believes in free enterprise, strong borders and a cohesive society. If you want something else, join something else - or start something of your own.

Our policy is to deport all those with no legal right to be here and encourage the departure of those who don't belong here. We believe in the rule of law and one law for all, and no ethnic group or faith is entitled to any exemptions.

It is our view that there are upward of 2m illegals who must go, and as many from the Boriswave who must also leave. We are also of the view that there are communities in Britain who will never integrate and have no desire to. We will show them the door. We invite them to leave, but will eventually force them if necessary.

It is not our view that all post-1997 immigration must be reversed, but we recognise that for Britain to continue existing as a functioning society, for the very survival of those much-vaunted "British values", we must enact policies to favour the native majority - and ensure future immigration comes only from compatible cultures.

Restoring Britain is not done through immigration policies alone. There is a housing, health and education dimension to this. We will remake Britain for the continuity of its peoples. We are not afraid to put our own people first. In due course we will publish a full manifesto of policies to this end.

While we will favour own people, we do not believe in hostility towards fellow British patriots whose ethnic heritage is elsewhere, and those who contribute will continue to be treated fairly. We simply recognise that the native peoples of this island have nowhere else they can call home.

In practical terms, this means that persons with no significant ties to these islands can no longer be entitled to housing or to stand for parliament or hold office in security sensitive areas such as defence and immigration. This is not radical. This is a return to sanity.

We will always welcome those who make a positive contribution to the economic, cultural and intellectual life of the country, but never again will we allow Britain to be a flop house for anyone who wants to exploit the trust and generosity of the people of Britain. If, though, you believe that people should be shown the door purely for the colour of their skin, you are in the wrong party.

[Harrison Pitt @Harry_pitt]

‘Ethnonationalism’ was coined by the Left-liberal historian Hans Kohn at the tailend of WWII precisely in order to muddy the waters.

The aim was to confuse a healthy love of one’s own with predatory fascism. This move has been tremendously successful on its own subversive terms, but catastrophic for the West.

When Rupert says he “detests ethnonationalism,” he pictures brownshirts smashing up businesses. He does not picture those among our public-spirited supporters and activists who choose to identify with that term.

We should not be bewitched by Kohn’s mischief. But I can assure you, Rupert wants to live to see mass migration reversed and demographic security achieved for the native peoples of Britain.

In addition to pushing these policies in public, he has told me as much many times in person and I would not devote my time to a party committed to anything less.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Starmer resigns - he has been a truly disgraceful Prime Minister.

I do not believe him to be a good man or a patriot.

He has deliberately and rapidly accelerated the destruction of our Britain, of our home.

History will not remember him kindly, nor should it.

I sat in Parliament, looking him in the eye, listening to him attempting to justify his decision to block a national inquiry into the mass rape of young British girls.

I will never forgive him. For that, and so much else.

What comes next, I do not know.

Whatever that is, Restore Britain will be ready to offer the British people a democratic route out - a better way, the only way.

But Starmer is gone.

And that is a good thing.

Enjoy it.