@AllenDavid1049@Ramadhyeya@BDUTT He could have separated???? One of these alleged loose woman died and now he’s responsible for abetting it. He will get away because he’s from a liar family. Can’t get clearer than that.
@Ramadhyeya@BDUTT Pls keep this Hindu narrative to yourself. Nobody forced the guy to marry the victim. He was well within his rights to walk out if he wanted to “judge” her and tormenting someone is your Hinduism not mine.
The way they have openly supported terrorism and even admitted to protecting Hafiz Saeed—the mastermind behind the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and a UN-designated terrorist—says everything about where they stand.
Thousands of innocent people killed. Hundreds of thousands suffered. Tens of billions of dollars got blown away. And these morons are celebrating. Worse they are now polluting the culture of the UK.
https://t.co/tdfOhyUkUI
@Dr_MD12@BRICSinfo You couldn’t reach any air base and we don’t pay taxes to feed terror factories. We have an economy to keep our people going. Go find some new loan sharks.
We wanted to take out terrorists and we did. Their defence minister openly admitted that Pakistan is a victim of terrorism. Why do they not ask their govt if they are doing something about it? Even Bollywood movies make more sense.
We don't have records, we don't have numbers, we don't have technical details - but we've downed their planes.
Is this an official press conference or a third-rate Bollywood movie? Jokers.
Operation Sindoor vs. Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos
Some of the firsts
One :
Realizing the stalemated status or irrelevance of the UNSC, India didn’t seek to request sympathy from the five of the 1945. Operation Sindoor clearly demonstrated a strong sense of self-confidence and real strategic autonomy and sovereignty.
Two:
For the first time, India shredded the notion that terrorists are separate from terrorist backers and thus targeted both. The notion that certain powerful rogue officers of Pakistani State authorize terrorist attacks was also shredded. This is a new paradigm. Another type of deniability must be invented.
Third:
There was a battle going and a war being planned. In the midst of the battle, Pakistan negotiated for a loan from the IMF, which surprisingly approved it. It matters because most likely Pakistan isn’t fit enough to finance a war but has capabilities to engage in battles. A war can't be won with IMF loans anyway.
Fourth:
The strategic patience and cultural restraint have a limit. That limit was tested on April 22 by the Lashkar Teyba terrorists. Perhaps they wanted what followed. They didn’t benefit from their adventure though. Perhaps they wanted to humiliate India publicly. They seem to be mentally stuck in 2008.
Fifth:
Size matters. Every inch of Pakistan was under reach. I always thought the Nur Khan airbase was the best defended base of Pakistan. It isn’t. The grarrison town of Rawilpindi as the heart of Pakistan’s military and its best-known airbase was hit.
Sixth:
Pakistan lost the monopoly over Islamic Fatwa. The Indian ulema presented a fatwa of their own to their own government. Thus, the religious dimension always exploited by Pakistan to earn sympathy from the Muslim Ummah evaporated. Deoband is located in India by the way.
Seventh:
Keeping secrets in a democratic society is next to impossible, but very little leaked out of India, which shows enormous skills in adhering to principles of operational silence and public unity to assist in safeguarding of secrets.
Note: I have seen very little or no visuals from Operation Bunyan Ul Marsoos to comment on. Seemingly, it never took off the way it was propagated. The ceasefire saved Pakistan’s skin. Pakistan military leadership has made statements and claims over their own achievements, but the Indian skies remained open, flights weren’t cancelled, and I haven’t seen visuals of missiles landing in Delhi or Amritsar.