if they:
•consistently post similar narratives,
•use the same framing
•publish within minutes of each other,
•amplify one another almost exclusively,
then those patterns are also legitimate subjects for analysis. (Daniel Thiele et al)
I've seen the same pattern within your camp as well (no need to @ anyone). The question is: should we also conclude, based on your research, that someone is paying you? Or is there an exception when the pattern runs in the opposite direction
If you've been on X for a while, you'd know that the majority of Rwandans voluntarily side with their government's position. In fact, they have often been labelled "bots" because of what many see as excessive online chauvinism.
That is arguably the phenomenon worth researching, not making "discoveries" about something that has been in plain sight for years.
As for the journalism part... yikes. I've got news for you.
The United States stands with the people of Spain, and all Europeans, against this egregious violation of their sovereignty and human rights.
This unacceptable incident is the direct result of the Spanish Government's deliberate efforts to enable and facilitate mass illegal migration into Europe.
We are considering actions to defend Americans at home and abroad from this threat and stand ready to assist other European allies considering similar options.
Thousands of illegal African migrants overrun Spanish enclave, turn streets into open toilets and bathe in fountains: 'An apocalypse' https://t.co/aqoQLta1am
Imagine doing an interview in which the interviewer asks a few semi-tough questions and you, the richest man in the world, has this whiny authoritarian meltdown after the interview airs.
People worship this guy? Seriously?