Evan

👨‍💻 Coder & builder, obsessed with AI
☕ Tech, plus little things in life
💭 Tools, takes, occasional rambles
🌱 Still learning, still trying.

[Evan @noname_nonce]

@mr_easonyang 来自x友的祝福

[Evan @noname_nonce]

Claude 付款页：支持银联了，支付宝了，

欢迎欢迎～

Claude 风控：封禁账号

[Evan @noname_nonce]

Codex points out a problem. Claude Code agrees.

Okay, but show me what breaks. Give me the input, the wrong output, or a failing test.

That's how I'd judge whether the second subscription is doing anything useful.

[Evan @noname_nonce]

@NikitaYVolkov 😁，你敢起诉它吗，

[Evan @noname_nonce]

"Which one is everyone choosing?"

[Evan @noname_nonce]

I Paid $200 a Month for "Max 20x." Anthropic Just Renamed It — and Kept the Smaller Limit

Let me start with who I am: not a reviewer, not a competitor, not a hater on a free account. I'm a paying customer. For months, I paid $200 a month for Claude Max — the top tier, the one called "20x."

Twenty times. That was the product name. That was the promise.

Here's what "20x" actually meant, as Anthropic's own subscription lead explained once users started asking questions: the 20x applied to the 5-hour usage limit. The weekly limit — the one that actually decides how much a heavy user can get done — was 10x.

Read that again. Half the headline number, on the limit that matters more.

When a company discovers its plan's name promises double what the plan delivers, there are two honest options: raise the limit to match the name, or lower the price to match the limit.

Anthropic chose a third option: change the name.

"Max 20x" is now "Ultra." The 20x framing is gone from the label. The 10x weekly limit is still in the product. They removed the number they couldn't defend and kept the limit they didn't want to raise.

That's not fixing a naming confusion. That's selective math. A rename is not a refund, and a new label is not more usage.

Why should you care if you don't pay for Claude? Because this is now the standard playbook for AI subscriptions: sell a multiplier, define that multiplier where it matters least, and when customers notice — rebrand. If renaming counts as fixing, every plan name in this industry is just a rumor.

I'm still a customer. I still think Claude is a great product. That's exactly why this stings — great products don't need creative accounting.

So to the person who signed off on this: you didn't rename my plan. You halved the promise and hoped nobody would do the math.

My advice: resign.

[Evan @noname_nonce]

我需要收集claude顶级用法，因为我并不觉得它比astra6聪明

[Evan @noname_nonce]

新蓝v可以看看

[元晨 JeffRuan @JeffRuan_]

https://t.co/oZ7UFWj62o

[Evan @noname_nonce]

Astra6.2要来了，

大家期待吗

[Evan @noname_nonce]

Gpt6.2灰度到了大部分人，但是还是没干过opus5.5

[Evan @noname_nonce]

@xiaodage8899 认真体会图文坐姿

[Evan @noname_nonce]

出大事了

[z3r0o8(008) @z3r0o80]

阿姨 成绩的事先放一放吧

出大事了……

[Evan @noname_nonce]

@cxknh5z 恭喜

[Evan @noname_nonce]

OpenAI 想融 300 亿，只拿到约 110 亿承诺，目标先砍到 200 亿，估值也从 1.4 万亿缩到 1.25 万亿。连 Anthropic 上市前都被预期只能拿 BB 级。AI 圈闭眼给钱的时代，结束了？还是说这只是估值回归？

[Evan @noname_nonce]

@Pengchenop 曝光量稳定不动

[Evan @noname_nonce]

兄弟们，能拯救我吗
#蓝V互关互粉

[Evan @noname_nonce]

Brothers, can you help a brother out?

[Evan @noname_nonce]

OpenAI wanted $30B. It got ~$11B in commitments, cut the target to $20B, and saw its valuation slide from $1.4T to $1.25T. Even Anthropic is reportedly expected to land only a BB rating pre-IPO. The era of blind AI money is over — or is this just valuations coming back to Earth?

[Evan @noname_nonce]

给我一张你们认为最漂亮的女性图片，让我看看你们的品味

[Evan @noname_nonce]

大模型出来后，大家变的更穷，这是一个暴论