Jack Handley

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@TakethatCt @HiimMe27 @RosieM1276203 1 survey was conducted by Thomas Haviland. There were over 250 embalmers from around the world surveyed. There was also an earlier survey that involved 269 embalmers from 2023. Both had reports of significant increases in these clots. Both surveys non vetted and non peer reviewed

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@HiimMe27 @TakethatCt @RosieM1276203 There were 250 embalmers in the worldwide embalmer survey. Where did you get 2 from?

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@TakethatCt @RosieM1276203 They have been multiple surveys indicating that embalmers have since 2021, have been finding unusually long and fibrous clots at a much higher rate than pre 2021. Yes this is non peer reviewed. A significant anecdote though.

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@jonathanstea @KrutikaKuppalli I have done things I wouldn't do again and would advise against?

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@IanCopeland5 @PeterHotez “Follow‑up began 6 months after the index date in both groups to address immortal time bias.”

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@IanCopeland5 @PeterHotez Great a study that includes data if you die more than 6 months after. The people that died a week after their jab would feel left out of this masterpiece.

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@DrSusanOliver1 I am very open to seeing any recent real world data reflecting a death rate anywhere close to what you stated in developed countries

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@DrSusanOliver1 Or were you giving global and historical averages and stating its the current rate in developed countries accidentally?

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@Soulgirl1RN @AaronSiriSG Pieces of DNA, fragments i think the term is. But I for sure agree the he is making it sound much worse than it is 🤷

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@scarredeye @TheChiefNerd @grok So based on the data he mentioned, there was no evidence that proved it prevented illness or death...Offit is splitting hairs here. I would expect a clear statistical benefit with something so widely recommended

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@TRHLofficial Poor little guy. Mum making him feel scared and sad to get her Narcissistic fix 🤢

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@redpilldispensr Problem is you then need your phone on you though? I think phones have a higher SAR.

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@MatRog6 @P_McCulloughMD @NathanMeadPhD @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @grok I think the problem with asking grok everything is grok claims 7+ higher from covid infection. Above study seems to be talking about children. So the cdc study is non comparable, yet grok used it to compare 🤔

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@EricEdmeades @DrCatharineY Ideological possession, and tribal dynamics.

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@CowcatEsq @neoavatara Don't be ridiculous. They did a massive safety study for pre licensure on 147 participants and monitored them for five whole days for adverse effects without a control group. How much more thorough proof of safety do you need!

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@tracybeanz @AaronSiriSG @delbigtree @TraderBigWick

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@IanCopeland5 Wasn't the issue that it is so good at picking up material (especially at upper thresholds), that it was picking up non viable pieces and therefore shouldn't have been used as a diagnostic tool for infection?

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@SensaiGaia1 @MakeAmericaHA @CombatingAutism There are obviously other things that could cause or contribute to autism

[Jack Handley @nonamesleft1993]

@IanCopeland5 @AislingOLoughl1 That is absolutely untrue sir