Stefan Marquis

Le principe de base de toute constitution démocratique, c'est la liberté. | The base principle of any democratic constitution is freedom.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

Vous qui vivez en pays où les gouverneurs généraux sont nommés, tout comme le sont les membres du Conseil privé, les sénateurs, les juges, les vérificateurs et maints autres postes d'État ; où l'un est fils de premier ministre ou parrain d'un autre ; où les amis de jeunesse tous festoyant sur photo d'époque autour du fils népotique deviennent chef de cabinet, ministre ou conseiller en chambre close au premier ministres ; où les tribuns médiatiques chargés de défendre l'intérêt du peuple passent la porte giratoire et deviennent députés sous le chef qu'ils flattaient ; quand un premier ministre achète l'opposition pour régner comme souhaite sa volonté ; quand enfin vous qui votez deux fois par décennie voyez sur un scrutin 91 candidats lorsqu'il n'y a qu'une poignée de partis politiques, vous prétendez vivre en régime démocratique ?

Alors dites-moi, la pilule bleue... vous aide-t-elle à relaxer ? Un autre "Go Habs Go!" avec ça pour satisfaire votre quête au confort ?

👇🏻

«
En revanche, quand tous ne participent pas aux délibérations, mais seulement des élus qui gouvernent légalement comme dans le cas précédent, alors on a une oligarchie. D’autre part, quand ceux qui ont qualité souveraine pour délibérer s’élisent entre eux, et quand le fils succède à son père et que ces gens sont souverains en matière législative, cette organisation-là est forcément oligarchique au plus haut degré.
»

Aristote, Politique IV.14 [1298 b]

---

You who live in a country where governor generals are appointed, just as are members of the Privy Council, senators, judges, auditors general and many other state positions; where one is the son of a prime minister or the godfather of another; where childhood friends, all gambolling together in an old photograph around some nepotistic son, become either chief of staff, minister or senior advisor in the Prime Minister’s inner circle; where media figures tasked with defending the people’s interest walk through the revolving door and become MPs under the very leader they used to flatter; when a prime minister buys the opposition so he can rule exactly as he wishes; when finally you, who vote twice a decade, see 91 candidates on a ballot when there is only a handful of political parties — you claim to live in a democratic regime ?

So tell me… does the blue pill help you relax? Want another “Go Habs Go!” with it to soothe your perpetual itch for comfort?

👇🏻

«
On the other hand, when not everyone participates in the deliberations, but only elected officials who govern legally as in the previous case, then we have an oligarchy. Furthermore, when those who possess sovereign authority to deliberate elect one another, and when the son succeeds his father and these individuals are sovereign in legislative matters, this form of organization is necessarily oligarchic in the highest degree.
»

Aristotle, Politics IV.14 [1298 b]

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@Pat77432407 Argumentaire impressionant et rigoureux. J'y vois là de la vérité.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@MarcNixon24 Mark Miller never once came to my door as a political candidate. All he ever did was mail a folded pamphlet to my mailbox once or twice a year with his face on it, smiling.

Now, he is one of the most dangerous MPs running this country. His face rarely smiles; it snides rather.

[Vesper @vesperdigital]

In case anyone wants sourcing for these claims... Here you go.

Save these!!!!

1. Mark Carney left his role as Chair and Head of Transition Investing at Brookfield Asset Management (overseeing a $100B+ transition platform) to become Prime Minister. https://t.co/5YGmBQYzsv https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

2. Carney’s Brookfield portfolio was strategically diversified across housing, infrastructure, nuclear, data centers, renewables and carbon capture — the exact sectors now prioritized as national policy. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

3. Brookfield pitched the $50B “Maple Fund” for housing, infrastructure, nuclear, data centers and carbon capture while Carney was still Chair — the proposal was rejected at the time. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

4. As Prime Minister, Carney can advance policies in sectors where Brookfield holds major investments without triggering personal conflict due to the broad-class loophole in the Conflict of Interest Act section 2(1). https://t.co/czdXdrwcBY https://t.co/RFYinqmN9B

5. The Conflict of Interest Act loophole excluding “general application” or “broad class” decisions has existed since 2006 and was recommended for reform by multiple Ethics Commissioners. https://t.co/RFYinqmN9B https://t.co/5r8oRH0eVj

6. Carney holds approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options expiring in 2033 plus deferred compensation and carried interest directly tied to Brookfield’s performance. https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94 https://t.co/HmOO94CpOZ

7. The blind trust and ethics screen covering Brookfield and over 100 affiliates do not prevent Carney from participating in broad sector-wide policy decisions that can increase the value of his holdings. https://t.co/LvtCWsrd7d https://t.co/hZw6QeRhrT

8. Carney entered the Prime Minister role with extensive prior corporate ties and questions about how much financial exposure he brought into the PMO. https://t.co/ZNkenzKoll https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

9. Carney built his Brookfield role around ESG and transition investing while positioning himself as a climate and investment expert. https://t.co/5YGmBQYzsv

10. The pattern of Carney’s pre-PM investments and roles created a ready template for the policies he now advances as national priorities. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

11. Brookfield and Carney (via performance-linked compensation) stand to benefit from government focus on housing, infrastructure, nuclear power and carbon capture — sectors highlighted in the rejected Maple Fund. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

12. All claims in the video are drawn from public documents, sworn testimony, news reports and official government records. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RFYinqmN9B

13. Carney is not accused of stealing or breaking laws — he is profiting from weak ethics rules that previous governments failed to fix. https://t.co/czdXdrwcBY

14. Past governments had opportunities to close the Conflict of Interest Act loophole but left it in place. https://t.co/RFYinqmN9B https://t.co/5r8oRH0eVj

15. Tracking Carney’s investments, Brookfield roles and emerging policies reveals a clear interconnected system. https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

16. The Maple Fund was pitched while Carney was Chair of Brookfield and sought public and pension capital for sectors now advanced under his leadership. https://t.co/nVbpTKOXUN https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

17. Deferred bonuses and carried interest from Brookfield funds Carney helped manage remain tied to the firm’s success even after he entered politics. https://t.co/HmOO94CpOZ

18. Ethics screen administrators lack full visibility into all Brookfield subsidiary holdings that directly affect Carney’s compensation. https://t.co/ZNkenzKoll https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

19. Carney’s career path created a self-reinforcing alignment between his financial interests and Canadian government policy direction. https://t.co/RnfL0F3I94

20. The system allows a Prime Minister with deep prior corporate ties in key sectors to legally shape broad policy without triggering ethics violations because the loophole was never fixed. https://t.co/RFYinqmN9B https://t.co/5r8oRH0eVj

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

Nous nous rapprochons d'un point de rupture. Les moutons ruinent nos acquis et les esprits libres fortifient leur position. Ça ne va pas bien aller. Lisez les commentaires.
---
This will not go well. We are heading for a confrontation between People and State. Read the comments.

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🚨🇨🇦 Mark Carney just told Canadians they will be part of “the next world order” emerging from Europe. 🇪🇺

📌Not a vote.
📌Not a referendum.
📌Not a consultation.

“Canada will be part of that effort.”
The Prime Minister of Canada just committed your country to a European-led global order you never agreed to, never debated, and never approved.

He doesn’t work for you.
He works for them.

📉 #CdnPoli #Carney #Canada

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@wealthmoose @LanceNadeau3 Man, am I ever so tired of all of this shit... it's a nightmare that just WILL NOT END. Klaus' "penetrators" are usurping all that our ancestry so earnestly accomplished for us. It is the biggest of crimes and the police, parliaments, media and the army are all protecting them.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

Who? Please, someone: tell me. From whom does this egotistical maniac think he got any right to restructure the 'World order' and force Canada into it? Who??? The Canadian people? Hum, no. Canadians don't have that power. They only seemingly gave him a primeministership for their own juridiction.

So what the hell is going on here?

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@bruce_mcgonigal He does love to play "Master of the World", doesn't he...

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

Jamais je ne pourrai le répéter assez souvent👇🏻

«
Les représentants du peuple français, constitués en Assemblée nationale, considérant que l'ignorance, l'oubli ou le MÉPRIS des droits de l'homme sont les seules causes des malheurs publics et de la corruption des gouvernements...
»

Début du préambule de la Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen (1789).

François-Philippe Champagne semble appertenir au club des gens qui n'ont pas encore compris. Pourtant, c'est étonnant : il se dit avocat.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[Vesper @vesperdigital]

Imagine actually believing, even for a second that these two were actually in it to help their fellow citizens and not enriching themselves.

We're being assaulted everyday by the gullibility and stupidity of the masses.

[Francois Bullock (Patriote XV) @FluxState_DAO]

BREAKING -

S'exprimant à Paris en France, Mark Carney déclare :

« Je crois que le NOUVEL ORDRE MONDIAL sera probablement construit à partir de l'Europe et que le Canada fera partie de cet effort. »

Carney fait l'éloge de la nouvelle législation qu'il a introduite pour interdire les médias sociaux pour les enfants de moins de 16 ans.

Source : cpac

#Godkeepourland #Canada #Liberté

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

In 2024, I was fervently and determinably against the move by the Liberals to hijack our fundamental rights. My position has not changed one bit as they, foolishly, persist in their abject behaviour.

---

En 2024, j'étais foncièrement contre la tentative des Libéraux de prendre en otage nos droits fondamentaux. Rien n'a changé d'un brin alors qu'ils persistent, bêtement, par abjecte volonté.

https://t.co/sjEz34K0Tk

[National Post @nationalpost]

The Liberals' Bill C-34 is a boomer plan to censor the internet, writes Jamie Sarkonak.

'The legislation aims to censor political speech, while putting draconian rules around what kids can do online' https://t.co/v8jwX20Dmf

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@nationalpost @strauss_matt Why? Why do you think Carney schemed his majority? Why?? Why is this exactly the FIRST THING the Liberals force upon the Nation? Because it is about control. This has always been the objective and no one is falling for it.

https://t.co/5KrgRtreFy

[Alex Armstrong @Alexarmstrong]

Read this open statement by Signal and your jaw will hit the floor.

Govts always use “protecting children” as their guise for more control and censorship.

I interviewed a prev Govt minister, who wrote the Online Safety Bill, and asked if they could tell me how a VPN worked. They couldn’t. These are the people writing these laws.

This new tool is another dangerous form of silent oppression that once again uses children’s safety as a guise to control the masses.

We can protect children online, but that starts at home, with parents, not in the Home Office, GCHQ, Apple, Google, Microsoft or Samsung.

[Alex Armstrong @Alexarmstrong]

Read this open statement by Signal and your jaw will hit the floor.

Govts always use “protecting children” as their guise for more control and censorship.

I interviewed a prev Govt minister, who wrote the Online Safety Bill, and asked if they could tell me how a VPN worked. They couldn’t. These are the people writing these laws.

This new tool is another dangerous form of silent oppression that once again uses children’s safety as a guise to control the masses.

We can protect children online, but that starts at home, with parents, not in the Home Office, GCHQ, Apple, Google, Microsoft or Samsung.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Bill C-34 creates a social media ban for Canadians under 16 at the expense of all Canadians' privacy.

Sections 26, 27(1), and 27(2) of Bill C-34 require that affected social media platforms “implement age-verification and age-estimation measures designed to prevent a person under the age of 16 from being able to have an account with, or be otherwise registered with,” those social media platforms.

Bill C-34 requires that such measures must provide for the “protection” and eventual “destruction” of “personal information that is collected for age-verification or age-estimation purposes.”

It is not yet clear how this will be accomplished. What is clear is that these measures must be “effective.” Users commonly verify their age by submitting government-issued identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or passports. And, the technology exists for social media platforms to estimate the ages of users through biometric data, e.g., facial geometry, eye shape, skin elasticity, hairline, etcetera.

This age-verification and age-estimation monitoring will not be limited to Canadians under age 16. For social media platforms to determine access eligibility for any user, platforms will have to evaluate the access eligibility of every user.

The goal of Bill C-34 is not merely to remove Canadians under age 16 from affected social media platforms but to keep them off those platforms. To achieve this goal, social media platforms may be compelled to adopt ongoing age-verification/estimation measures to ensure continued compliance.

However affected social media platforms satisfy these requirements, Bill C-34 fundamentally reimagines how all Canadians access social media.

This Bill deputizes affected social media platforms into forcing Canadians to surrender more data as a precondition of participation in the digital public square. This, in turn, raises serious concerns about Canadians' privacy rights and may engage constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure - guaranteed by section 8 of the Charter.

Read the full text of the bill here: https://t.co/BAHnXrsJIR

[HoCStaffer @HoCStaffer]

What's worse than a Liberal Bill targeting online content?

One that doesn't set out the rules in the Bill so Parliament can debate their merits.

Instead it gives Cabinet the power over 19 decisions & a Liberal-appointed "Digital Safety Commission" 31 more.

Bill C-34 is worse than we thought. 🧵

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@HoCStaffer https://t.co/5KrgRtreFy

[Alex Armstrong @Alexarmstrong]

Read this open statement by Signal and your jaw will hit the floor.

Govts always use “protecting children” as their guise for more control and censorship.

I interviewed a prev Govt minister, who wrote the Online Safety Bill, and asked if they could tell me how a VPN worked. They couldn’t. These are the people writing these laws.

This new tool is another dangerous form of silent oppression that once again uses children’s safety as a guise to control the masses.

We can protect children online, but that starts at home, with parents, not in the Home Office, GCHQ, Apple, Google, Microsoft or Samsung.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@JCCFCanada https://t.co/5KrgRtreFy

[Alex Armstrong @Alexarmstrong]

Read this open statement by Signal and your jaw will hit the floor.

Govts always use “protecting children” as their guise for more control and censorship.

I interviewed a prev Govt minister, who wrote the Online Safety Bill, and asked if they could tell me how a VPN worked. They couldn’t. These are the people writing these laws.

This new tool is another dangerous form of silent oppression that once again uses children’s safety as a guise to control the masses.

We can protect children online, but that starts at home, with parents, not in the Home Office, GCHQ, Apple, Google, Microsoft or Samsung.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@vesperdigital @grok @CBCNews @CTVNews @globalnews @globeandmail @nationalpost @csgazette @LP_LaPresse @RebelNewsOnline

Read this thread and weep.

[Stefan Marquis @nonmecensorem]

@vesperdigital @grok @CBCNews @CTVNews @globalnews @globeandmail @nationalpost @csgazette @LP_LaPresse @RebelNewsOnline

Read this thread and weep.