normativefact

In the neighborhood of some level of utility with a taste of deontology hinging on sentience lies normative facts standing with a capitalist-esque fervor.

[normativefact @normativefact]

I can only hope that I garner close friends of such that when I am wrong, they remark—in strong terms—that I am wrong, and provide me their reasons.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit You're misreading what I am saying, I will talk about this later. You should probably look into meta logic and validity & soundness specifically in the mean time.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit It's a single model counterexample I have to find, just assert Γ & ~(C1-Cn). Under classical logic and the standard rules of inference, you 'cant get to' C1-Cn since P therefore Q is invalid, so is φ in Γ |- ψ where ψ isnt in Γ and neither is (φ -> ψ).

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit Well validity isn't very hard to verify.

You can let the set of the premises be Γ, and I'm just saying it isn't the case that Γ |- C1,C2,..,Cn where Cn is a conclusion. There isn't a sequence of formulas inclusive of those in Γ that give you C1 to Cn. Γ true, C false possible

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit It doesn't follow any rule of inference. I'll give it a more thorough read later.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit We're going to have to linearize on what exactly you think is at stake, and what specific aspect of the argument that you present in the stack addresses or supports your point.

I think the argument is invalid, and requires a lot of work to come to agreed upon terminology too.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit Yeah, I don't see this as problematic. I also see how what you gave me as a substack was relevant to what I said or how I was wrong. Anarchy is just defined as the absence of political authority, and sane justifications of pol' auth. will zone out of the individual.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@EiratheIntern This is the same as saying everything is subjective because objective things have to be interpreted subjectively.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@adarshisit What do you think I'm saying?

[normativefact @normativefact]

@floydo012 @CitedNeed I consider immoral, moral, and so on to be all things considered considerations. If something is immoral, all of the auxillary things have been taken into account.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@edisruof @entoliberal @MinCorpPixel @TohsakaPsycho "this" referring to?

[normativefact @normativefact]

@edisruof @entoliberal @MinCorpPixel @TohsakaPsycho Why do you people think this is anything but equivalent to "Location: India", "Jeet detected, opinion rejected"? It is a bit ironic how you have to pull this to someone you alledge is having difficulty engaging with the merit of what is said.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@floydo012 @CitedNeed Okay, this is a better, non question-begging answer.

You could say this for >0 civilian death, too, but you seem to hold 1 person dying for Saddam's death is worth it.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@pangram but it's for detecting speech patterns of historical figures and such. Might be able to figure out who read what, inspirations taken from whom, etc.? Also could find people's alts via speech patterns, maybe.

Assuming I'm not hilariously off on how pgram works.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@qualiascript It's completely legal to kill animals, would you say the same of vegans that argue against the permittance of such acts?

[normativefact @normativefact]

@floydo012 @CitedNeed If you assume 1:100 is immoral it makes it very easy to argue that when I question is it immoral. The cases presented are supposed to elicit intuitive appeal of such a thing absent such assumption as either support or detraction.

[normativefact @normativefact]

I think it's near that period where I promised myself there ought be only be a <<< my-age years before I end it all—and good riddance to that disgusting life.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@floydo012 @CitedNeed To the extent that 100 civilians dead is worth it for a chance at their stronghold over a *much* larger civilian pop. weakening significantly.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@floydo012 @CitedNeed Saddam Hussein, Sinwar, Escobar, various leaders of the Cartel, Hezbollah Leaders, Iranian leaders, all of these are pretty easily seen by me as being figures when dislodged, causing extreme destruction in their respective organization directionally weaking them.

[normativefact @normativefact]

@2ndaccincase @WesternMANergy Aisha, Fatima, etc.