@transitracer this is extremely valid, somehow i saw the "owes 10k to the irs" thing, and completely missed the "...has been unemployed ever since" thing
@budyfish a solid half of my social circle work regular jobs, and many of the ones who don't are younger or finishing school. working a normal job is good!!
@ZoeyThePlop Be diligent enough that you could be a musician. take care of yourself so you're no longer chopped. don't believe yourself to be dumb; you can learn with practice and study. and then find something you want to do, and work towards that
getting really hard to have a customer service smile at this gas station when i get paid $11/hr and the white house released a document this morning saying theyll find and kill me for being a tranny
@inerati I’m really happy with Bitwarden. It’s open source, it has a built-in authenticator, it’s inexpensive (but good and very reliable), and I’ve used it for years without issue. You can also self-host an individual or organizational account, but I just use their managed service.
@ClownLuvrCommie Idk if this answer will be helpful but it's how I think about it. Its less about learning to love "the parts of yourself that you hate" and more about accepting that you got dealt a SHIT hand but you are what you do and you only do what you love.
@Strife212 I don’t think so. Hegseth has overstated what a supply chain risk designation actually entails, and it’s going to be challenged in court anyways
https://t.co/sflnUvxQ2q
perhaps an inconvenient truth that I have to face is that when you manually implement a repository, your time isn't spent just to create the code, but the same time also doubles as if you were studying the code. it is a bonus: when you make something, you create the best possible mental mode of that thing, so you learn it fully
vibe coding is cool and it is absolutely faster than coding manually, and anyone telling you otherwise is in denial. I strongly believe that. yet, if you just vibe code all day, you will not understand the code at all, you won't know the specific ways on which each thing was done, and, if things break and the AI can't fix it, you'll have an immense time debt to learn everything and fix the issue
so, yes, absolutely, if we really want to move to a world where we can vibe code and be in peace with the fact we do not read the code, we *need* to have a way to ensure the code is correct. that is only logical. we will still code, but we will do so in specs, in precise types. the code will derive from that. I'm every day more confident that this makes a lot of sense and I should probably take that seriously and focus more efforts on completing Bend2 asap and making my point clearer
yes it is 2am, sorry, I *was* trying to sleep
back to bed