@TaylorLorenz blocked me for telling the truth about her ties to OAI and affiliated organisations. @soontechnology has links to OAI and has not disclosed any funding from VC groups. This “new media” AI/VC apologetic thing disgusts me.
@kunaiposting missing the point idiot. you complained that “they” are going after Jensen instead of the other so-called problematic, AI leaders. The others seem to be loyal to natsec of the US.
@EgeErdil2 Jensen is not as private an individual as me. he’s deeply enmeshed with US national security and economy and should be held at higher standards especially since he got compromised by sleeping with a Chinese spy.
@SoberaniaBRASlL I’m afraid Marx really underestimated how many people would fall for false consciousness because if we have another revolution within the foreseeable future we’re going to have to enact Cultural Revolution x10000
@doomslide agreed with having to realign the runaway capital machine, however that’s imo improbable in the U.S even if it does a number on people. too much capital worship and false consciousness among the masses. e.g most hate Thiel but would never enact any opposing measures. true cattle.
@pablomartimar No, the real test for Jensen will be when AI can autonomously with minimal human-in-the-loop, design better compute. He’ll have to wean the AI labs’ CEOs for access to the internal model that can do that.
@JoePostingg it depends. if your singular goal is staving away ASI, then china invading taiwan might not be ideal. would provoke both governments to increase and centralise domestic production of chips and development of AI. kind of like how britain turned it’s civ manufacturing to arms.
@envisionedluna People on the internet, who aren’t rightists don’t understand that internet-spaces don’t cater for non-rightoid opinions. Ezra is fighting an uphill battle, stop trying to cast stones down on him.