@Haqiqatjou You’re wrong. They believed punishment in hell ends, but the ones in hell turn to dust, theyre not saved.
You misunderstood their view and its not 100% confirmed they personally held to it
@dmontetheno1@Newnotused Any classical or textual basis for this? I’ve repeatedly heard a possible maslaha is not justified for establishing a secular law.
@dmontetheno1@Newnotused I empathise with that as the same is for my country Kosova. But the thing is, whats the islamic basis of that?
Any scholarship you read rejects the secular gov and specifically preferring it to Gods law.
Sharia can be applied flexibly, modern day states have failed (saudi)
@dmontetheno1@IraniRoxanna So what was he trying to say then? Is the point that hadith scholars out to accept it on faith but from academic point of view it’s historically untenable?
Apologies if i misunderstood
@ssjcaba Not shaming you here, I hope you read the following, but what I am hearing is respectfully concerning.
Ahl as sunnah is bare minimum, most of the Quran is on warning you to do good (after kufr ofc).
@omar_dddg Ibn Taymiyyah didn’t take it to be a sure view he took it to be a possibility, due to some wordings.
Also he didn’t non Muslims then go to jannah, rather they perish.