Why is not OK for the DoD to accept a $400 million plane from Qatar, but it is ok for our elite universities to accept billions from Qatar?
How is one proper and the other not?
Just asking.
Core HR systems (onboarding, job histories, org chart, benefits, etc.) are not consolidated in the federal workforce.
From a March 2025 @USGSA survey of 29 agencies, there are 111 instances of 59 unique HR software products offered by 19 commercial vendors and 11 federal “vendors”. Price per employee for these systems are 3-10x higher than in private industry. And the majority of said systems do not allow the agencies to easily create or view a basic org chart.
DOGE and agencies are working to fix, with pilot projects starting this week.
For new followers, here is a diagram illustrating how core NGOs collaborate to create a global soft power structure that shapes elections, public policy, economic policy, and media influence.
Again, many **current** members of Congress hold positions within these taxpayer-funded NGOs. Please read the whole thread.
🧵THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED – They Believe They Are “Democracy”
The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty. Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State.
Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media. This was odd—after all, the U.S. is a democracy (or more precisely, a constitutional republic). But as I traced the influence of these NGOs, a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.”
Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. democratic efforts abroad—many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded. Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission. Now, they have positioned themselves as the guardians of democracy itself.
This shift explains why Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy." To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves. Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a direct attack on democracy itself.
US taxpayer dollars were going to be spent on the following items, all which have been cancelled:
-$69mm for the Eurasia Foundation to do "digital transformation activity" in Europe
-$32mm to Internews for programs including "media enabling democracy, inclusion, and accountability in Moldova" and the promotion of “sustainable media outlets"
-$7mm for the American Bar Association to promote the "resilience" of the "Eurasian legal sector and civic society"
-$520mm for a consultant to do ESG investments in Africa and "mobilize private sector resources and expertise”
-$25mm to “promote biodiversity conservation and promote licit livelihoods” by developing “socially responsible” behaviors in Colombia
-$40mm to "improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants"
-$42mm for Johns Hopkins to research and drive "social and behavior change" in Uganda
-$45mm to "address[] the needs, opportunities, and challenges identified by activists and other civic actors engaged in nonviolent collective action"
-$52mm for the World Economic Forum
@elonmusk Please audit every green card holder and citizens who falsely received them. They should be deported for lying on their applications. Deport!!!
@DerrickEvans4WV Please audit folks who falsely claimed asylum and received green card and citizenship. We have to revoke their green card and citizenship. Thanks.
The US government currently has ~4.6M active credit cards/accounts, which processed ~90M unique transactions for ~$40B of spend in FY24.
DOGE is working w/ the agencies to simplify the program and reduce admin costs - we will report back in 1 week.
https://t.co/Umuc0GLsvW