This is a moralistic critique, worker and bourgeois are not moral identities but simply structural identities abounded by social relations and its dynamics. The psychology of a bourgeois can individually attempt to retain himself from his social tendencies, just as a worker
It’s disgusting how white people engage in eubonics, irony soyspeak, and whatnot. Speak like a white man, use your words and your intellect, your vulgarness is a projection of your rotten soul.
Even engaging in it “metaironically” is not good for the heart.
America is a rootless multi-racial husk, it doesn't even have the racial foundation for a volksgemeinschaft. National Socialism is explicitly anti-American, FDR's New Deal was only pragmatically adopted as a means to compete against Europe you're an American dog & anti-European.
“The money, the honors, the mess of bodies, the eagerness to seize an earthly happiness which leaks between the fingers and always escapes, has made of the human herd a pitiful horde, ruining itself, tearing itself apart to find a liberation which does not exist.
This baseness has poured out from the limited circles of the ‘elites’ into the extended circles of the masses, tossing them about on waves of infinite desire, ambition and pseudo-pleasures which are just caricatures of Joy:
There is great hatred between men, between classes, between peoples.
Everyone is bent on the pursuit of material goods which ultimately avail nothing.
All abandon the goods, proffered to all, of the moral universe and the eternity of the soul.”
— Léon Degrelle
How about you actually read a book on Fascism before you start lecturing people who actually have. Fascism stems from Sorelianism which follows from the Jacobin revolutionary tradition continued on in Cercle Proudhon and Georges Valois. This was further affirmed by Marcel Déat.
@dadapweasegrayp@PNWSima You're arguing with a 70 IQ salivating mouthbreather who fancies himself a fascist while simultaneously larping as a Jacobin and glazing Robespierre. He also “despises moralfags” but draws the line at lolicunny.
A mental case, to say the least.
@AnatolianRapist It rejects the individualism of the French Revolution yes, but follows in that same tradition of Jacobinism. There are contexts where something is critiqued and others where continuity is affirmed. when he talks of communism and fascism's neo-Jacobin Blanquist roots.