@JC47053522 That’s a lot of hot air to diss the most effective, safest, scaleable, lowest materially intensive decarbonisation tech on the board, which outside the west is also super cheap. You must be a fossil shill.
The narrative, the myth, the delusions, of an "energy transition" is very sticky.... trying again with a reality check in my latest piece.
https://t.co/YIgQKhKJrd
@Atomicrod There’s virtually no western renewable producers anymore, and those that do produce pretty much rely entirely on Chinese produced components and supply chains.
Regardless - as you’ve probably mentioned before - the idea that renewables provide good local jobs is absurd.
@jm493_au@OskaArcher@LawleyEnergy Source data, convert to AUD. This excludes retail power bill relief and panic buying of LNG cargoes at above market prices.
Yes primary energy consumption is the data that really matters. 91% of Australia’s primary energy consumption is fossil energy
@jm493_au@OskaArcher@LawleyEnergy So after 25 years and $20 trillion on the wind and solar experiment now these technologies supply a bit over 3% of the global energy system. You must be a fan of cancelling future wind and solar projects based on this glacial rate of progress as well?
@TomPlayford3 Which is why the claims about overall monthly or quarterly percentages quoted by the boosters about wind and solar supply are completely irrelevant. Electricity is required to be delivered on demand when and where people need it.