SCOTUS: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson told the Court that presidents should not be able to fire the PhDs & experts who run the government. She even argued presidents should avoid control over transportation & the economy.
In a remarkable exchange in Trump v Slaughter, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed the president should have no power to fire expert bureaucrats. She said economists, PhDs, scientists, & transportation officials should operate beyond presidential reach. Such a view would carve the heart out of Article II & cement rule by permanent insiders rather than elected leadership. Jackson’s theory elevates the deep state over the voters who choose a president. That is a constitutional revolution in plain sight.
h/t @Badhombre
Most women dream of marrying a rich man. That dream is a cage with good interiors.
The larger the income gap, the less equal the marriage becomes.
If he earns 1 crore and you earn 10 lakh, sooner or later one thought enters the room: I'm doing everything. I'm paying for everything. What exactly are you bringing to the table.
You can't unhear that. Even if he never says it. People call it love. It's leverage.
He may never say it out loud. He's probably a decent guy. But somewhere in the back of his mind, permanently, without even trying, he knows. You are one-tenth of him. And when things get hard, and they always do, that math starts speaking.
The person with more money has more power. The person with more power sets the rules. That’s human nature.
Here's what nobody tells women when they're busy dreaming about rich husbands. Money is leverage. And leverage determines who adjusts, who shrinks, and who accepts.
He has options. You don't. That's not a marriage problem. That's a negotiation problem. And you came to the table with nothing.
Beauty? Gone in few years. Attraction normalises. Lifestyle normalises. What remains is whether he actually needs you or just hasn't replaced you yet.
Ask yourself one honest question before you marry someone rich - Is he with you because he needs you. Not wants. Needs.
If the answer is no, you're not getting a husband. You're getting a landlord.
The income gap between husband and wife should never cross 3x. After that it's not a marriage. It's a man keeping a dependent and calling it commitment.
House and Senate Judiciary Committee must call every top election official in California to the Hill, and appoint Special Masters to investigate the entire scheme. It was obviously set up to permit maximum corruption.
@RichardHanania Had they remained in India, it's quite possible they would have spent their careers as ordinary professionals working for multinational corporations rather than building the success they achieved abroad.
@RichardHanania India did not send them abroad to become billionaires & settle in the US. They chose to leave in pursuit of better opportunities, financial growth, & a system that rewarded merit more effectively. Many felt constrained by issues such as corruption & limited opportunities at home.
@tarauk As far as I am aware, there is no reservation quota for appointments to the Supreme Court.
With the same logic, How many Prime Ministers were from Tamil Nadu or Kerala or Andhra?
@rutu609 Since the discussion appears to be treating marriage like a business transaction rather than a personal relationship, how is the groom's family expected to verify a claim that the bride has never been in a physical relationship before marriage?
@tarauk There is a distinction between a public company and a private company. A private company has the right to set its own terms, conditions, and policies, provided they comply with applicable laws and regulations.
@tarauk Do you agree that women should not be receiving alimony merely because they were married?
Do you agree that child's born to someone else cannot be husbands?
@tarauk Hindu marriage law believes that Husband is ATM machine that never runs dry.
Under Hindu marriage law, a child born to a married woman is generally presumed to be the child of her husband, even if that the child was conceived with another man.
Why selective bias @tarauk?
@tarauk Yes, provided the allegations are proven in a court of law and not based solely on one party's claims.
Do you agree with the principle that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty? If so, do you believe laws such as Section 498A should be reformed?
Marriage in 2019
2 kids born
Wife falls for other man
Calls him home to have sex
Husband catches them red handed
So she poisons his food
Pours acid on his face
His entire face falls off
Eyes go totally blind
ATTACK IN 2025
LIFE SENTENCE TO WIFE IN 2026
KUDOS TO THE JUDGE 👏
@PoojaPriyam_ Your assumption that guys don’t want their kids after divorce is how your brain is wired.
That’s exactly what we call bias.
My daughters are with me & my ex after our divorce. Alternate week with us.
It’s not always about you, custody is about the kids. Kids need both parents