If you look at this and wonder, “When a day that starts as beautiful as this, how could it go wrong?” all you reveal is that you have never practiced law on the Friday before a holiday.
@RMFifthCircuit Tame . The 5th Cir found a trial judge’s alleged statement that “the only action this Court would like to be involved in in the future with regard to Mr. West would be to see the motherfucker fried” as not unduly antagonistic.
West v. Johnson, 92 F.3d 1385, 1411 (5th Cir. 1996)
@Reuters@CNNBusiness@GretchenShellUS@noonan49er Remember this case, you'll be covering it soon enough @HoustonChron@Shell_USA was happy with the $160 M the plaintiff brought to the company from her death bed, but needed an excuse to terminate her after her Stage 4 cancer diagnosis, so cited bogus "performance reasons".
@RMFifthCircuit Mild disagree. Privacy and recency are important elements of any argument. After going through the weeds of the brief it’s not bad just to “big picture” it at the end.