La Cukiss en la mesa de La Mansión VIP es el meme andante: dice “yo la menos hambreada” mientras hace caras de “me están matando de hambre y además me están contando un chisme que me va a cambiar la vida”.
Una mano en la cara, la otra señalando, boca abierta como si el pan que tiene enfrente le hubiera ofendido personalmente. El moreno de al lado come tranquilito y ella parece que está actuando la escena de “me acaban de romper el corazón con una pizza”.
Es esa energía de “no tengo hambre” pero el cuerpo entero grita “pásame lo que sea que estés comiendo y dime quién es el que está mintiendo”. Clásica Cukiss. A morir de la risa. 😂
Cinsellik üzerine konuştuğumuz bir seansta kadın danışanımın bana yaptığı teklif karşısında gerçekten şok oldum.
Eşiyle uzun zamandır cinsel hayatlarının olmadığını, kendisini artık çekici hissetmediğini anlatıyordu. Eşinin kendisine dokunmadığından, sürekli reddedilmekten ve zamanla kendine olan güvenini kaybettiğinden bahsediyordu.
Bir ara bana dönüp, “siz hiç evli bir kadınla birlikte olmayı düşündünüz mü?” diye sordu.
Sorunun konuyla ilgisini anlamaya çalışırken gülerek devam etti:
gm frens
Fair launches have a problem that most launchpads still haven't solved.
Everyone talks about preventing snipers, protecting early buyers and creating equal entry opportunities.
But fairness goes beyond who gets into a token first.
It comes down to how the entire economic system works before, during and after launch.
This is one reason I've been looking closely at @RebateLaunch.
One feature worth examining is its optional 10-second anti-sniping mechanism.
When enabled, the tax starts at 99% and halves every second until it reaches zero after 10 seconds.
At first glance, this looks like a mechanism designed to discourage automated sniping and give ordinary participants a more reasonable opportunity to enter.
But there's a more important question:
Where does the money actually go, and who gets to decide who pays it?
On Rebate Pad, the snipe tax is paid in the pair token to the same destination as the launch's payouts. That could mean holders or the creator, depending on the launch configuration.
There's also an important exception: creators can exempt their own wallets.
This is where transparency becomes essential.
If a launch is advertising equal treatment, participants should be able to understand which wallets are exempt, why they are exempt and how those permissions are established.
Anti-sniping is useful, but undisclosed privileges can undermine the very fairness the mechanism is supposed to create.
And the 10 second mechanism is only one part of the bigger picture 🧵