Building OffLadder—sparked by my 15-year-old son’s project on AI and future jobs. Helping people explore, test and adapt. Don’t pick your future. Test it.
OffLadder began with a project my 15-year-old son was working on:
What impact will AI have on jobs in the future?
We started discussing which jobs might disappear, which might emerge, and what work could look like when he becomes an adult.
That exposed a bigger problem. 🧵
@sridharfyi This weekend: a worked AI Career Stress Test for a hypothetical process engineer. It separates tasks AI may absorb, judgment that gains value, visible proof, and one 7-day experiment. The fuller process: https://t.co/r0G34L79q8
@launch_llama Building OffLadder because career choice should be tested, not guessed. It turns one direction into a 7-day work experiment. Today’s example asks whether a process engineer’s judgment travels beyond automotive. https://t.co/hYFqy5HT33
Leaving an industry is not the same as starting over.
Hypothetical: a process engineer has spent 12 years in automotive manufacturing and wants out.
An OffLadder Career Stress Test would ignore titles for a minute and split the work.
AI is likely to absorb more first-pass downtime analysis, first drafts of SOPs and routine root-cause summaries.
What becomes more valuable is designing the right experiment, earning operator trust, balancing quality with speed and safety, and owning whether the change actually works.
A seven-day test: take one process you know, map its failure modes, propose three countermeasures, and ask an operations leader outside automotive to critique it.
The real question is not “Can I leave automotive?”
It is “Does my process judgment travel?”
Hypothetical, not a real user story.
If you changed industries without changing the core work, what transferred?
"kinda hate my job" usually means one or two specific parts of it, not all of it. worth writing down which hours of the week actually drain you before you jump, otherwise you end up in the same shape somewhere new. https://t.co/xOgatY1Gxi does that in 3 questions if you want a shortcut.
@esteban2ton "no idea" is more common than people admit, most just fake a plan. you don't need the answer, you need two options you can poke at. try one for a week, notice if you'd do another week. built a free thing for exactly that stage if it helps, https://t.co/gxeYC87N7o, 3 questions.
the wedding invite season while you're still figuring things out is a specific kind of pressure. different timelines, that's all it is. one thing that helps: pick one direction and test it small for a week instead of trying to decide the whole life. if you want a starting point, https://t.co/xOgatY18HK gives you two to try in about 90 seconds.
the "longing to go to work" bar is too high honestly. the happy ones I know just don't dread mornings and get a couple of hours a week they'd do anyway. that's usually a specific task, not a job title. if you want a nudge on which tasks those might be for you, https://t.co/xOgatY1Gxi is 3 questions and about 90 seconds.
been sitting on this for a while.
most people I know who feel stuck at work aren't lazy. they're just choosing from like five jobs they saw growing up, then wondering why none of them fit.
I built OffLadder for that exact mess. 3 questions, about 90 seconds. you get two directions worth a look and one small thing to try this week. free, https://t.co/xOgatY1Gxi
if you're 19-34 and quietly googling career stuff at midnight, try it and tell me if the read is fluff. that's the bug I'm fixing.
makes sense from the org side, and it's brutal from the grad side. that pause lands right when a 22 year old is trying to figure out what they even want. the ones I see doing okay stop applying for a bit and go test one or two directions in small ways, then apply with something real to point at.
@symplysimbii@Tunde_OD@SamuelOtigba@hackSultan thanks Simbi, appreciate you. one favour when you do it: tell me straight if the read felt generic or actually sounded like you. that's the bit I keep rewriting.
to be specific: the landing page over-explains before anyone sees value, so people bounce before the 3 questions. and the result reads a bit generic for some folks, which is the part that actually matters. so, shorter intro, straight into the test, and results that name a real next step instead of vague vibes. https://t.co/xOgatY1Gxi if you want to poke holes.
@kyleecheungg X slaps that label on a lot of stuff automatically and it gets it wrong plenty. I'm a real guy, dad, building OffLadder on my phone between kid stuff. I do keep notes and clean up drafts, but the thinking and the product are mine.
@enkrataX honestly the bar is low on purpose. a good 20 minutes is one where you either want to keep going, or you're bored in a way you can name. ambivalence counts too, that's data. the only real question I ask people after is "would you do another 20 tomorrow".
@Maroonz80Sarah A slow creative season is a bad time to make a career decision. Try three small tests first: one commission-style brief, one stream, and one adjacent-role project like visual design or storyboarding. Score each for energy, demand, and whether you'd willingly do it again.
@kaadhalaa Stats can lead to three kinds of work: inference, prediction, or decisions. A useful 7-day test: turn one public dataset into a 1-page memo that recommends an action. I'm building OffLadder to help people test paths this way: https://t.co/pJM6K9mKsW Blunt feedback welcome.