ALIENS ARE BUYING BITCOIN
The city of Roswell, New Mexico was the site of a famous UFO crash in 1947. The US Army Air Force announced possession of a βflying discβ, believed by many to be an alien spacecraft.
Now, that same city holds $13.3K of BTC that it received as donations last year. Is this the first BTC in the possession of extraterrestrials?
Native Android development is now fully supported in Google AI Studio!
You can generate native Android apps from just a prompt, preview them via an embedded Android Emulator, and deploy them directly to test devices using ADB over USB.
https://t.co/4Z9lefJdPM
#GoogleIO
@bee_swarm@arkham If you don't support crime, surely you'll fall for tyranny.
That sounds cool and slick but doesn't really seem to be based off of any type of reality. Example: Ethereum rolled back a hack. It isn't some bastion of tyranny, bowing to every whim any madman makes.
@SalchichaVarry@Jhonffonseca Tienes razΓ³n en la base legal de la OTAN como ente defensivo, aunque el resto de tu argumento entra mΓ‘s en el terreno de la interpretaciΓ³n geopolΓtica y el conflicto de intereses
@_opr6@UHN_Plus La idea de calificar a otra persona como loca, especialmente cuando te encuentras en la situaciΓ³n de no considerarte tΓΊ mismo de ese modo, es algo que considero extraordinariamente loco...
Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. π
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.