@lukasz065 @lixsanlh @RedBullPU1 Good question, I havenβt seen Toto say this, the only thing I saw him saying was lower ride height had lead to performance increase, not that fraction of a millimetre they broke the rule with was the reason for the whole performance gain. However, a rule is a rule, DQ was fair
@DijkmanJulius @lukasz065 @lixsanlh @RedBullPU1 Merc was also the best car in Brazil last year, after not being competitive for the whole season, didnβt break any rules then. You canβt compare their pace in Brazil 23 with USGP 23 like that
@DijkmanJulius @lukasz065 @lixsanlh @RedBullPU1 Lowering your car by centimetres adds a lot og performance, I agree. This was a fraction of a millimetre, marginal for downforce. Performance can be track specific, just like Red Bull struggled in Singapore, but has been dominant on all other tracks.
@lukasz065 @lixsanlh @RedBullPU1 If you believe the ride height difference had any effect on Hamiltonβs pace that day, you list believe the minor overspend RB had on their budget also makes a difference. Fact is, both rule breaks have close to zero impact on performance
@KonTweets@EmilyMbeee K&F Concept Nano X VND, not sure if it is a version with diffusion built in, but I got the normal at least and it works very good
@fastpitstop This is not a good take, it sounds like when Alonso blamed Hamiltonβs actions for fans being racistβ¦ What Max does in a race does not justify any fan aggression that directly damages the driver mentally or physically. Regardless of the driver
@Hefest19 respect for telling it as it is. I donβt think anyone can say they have never used the word anywaysβ¦ and the fact you quit when you learnt the real implications is all that matters ππΎ
@Jibran64075107 @EZ_Mehrtenz @WillPar1sh@fastpitstop@SilverArrowsNet risking the whole race on lap 1, in the fastest car, because you want to hang it around the outside on a tight street circuit is the stupid mentality