@BRJohnsonTrust@EvanLuthra@khepri_thoth Good check.
I’m really curious what they think about security. A bad actor could hop the fence. Are they installing security cameras too then?
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
COVID changed my worldview permanently.
Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed.
Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it.
The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain.
This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone.
Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do.
What we have instead is a wall.
And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real.
While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product.
The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide.
It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence.
That decision is itself the answer.
The year is 1956. Your doctor tells you to eat margarine instead of butter. The margarine is industrially hydrogenated vegetable oil with a trans fat content that will, forty years later, be classified as one of the most harmful substances in the food supply. Your doctor does not know this. Nobody is asking.
The year is 1961. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine, bespectacled and certain. Your doctor now tells you to reduce animal fat. The evidence is a study that initially looked at twenty-two countries and was published with seven. France, which eats butter by the kilogram and has the lowest heart disease rates in Europe, is not one of them. The hypothesis is now a consensus. The consensus was built by excluding the data that disagreed.
The year is 1977. Senator McGovern releases Dietary Goals for the United States. Cut fat. Eat complex carbohydrates. The food industry hears this as bread, pasta, cereal, and an enormous commercial opportunity. Your doctor starts telling you to eat six servings of grain a day. You lose weight briefly and gain more back. Your doctor suggests you try harder.
The year is 1984. Time publishes another cover, two egg yolks and a strip of bacon arranged into a frown. Your doctor stops letting you eat eggs. The correction, that dietary cholesterol barely affects blood cholesterol for most people, will arrive in 2015.
The year is 1992. The food pyramid arrives. Six to eleven servings of bread at the base. Fats at the apex, to be used sparingly. Obesity rates, stable for thirty years, begin to climb almost immediately. Type 2 diabetes follows. Nobody connects the two because the pyramid is official, and official things cannot be questioned.
The year is 1995. SnackWell's fat-free cookies overtake the Oreo as the best-selling biscuit in America. They are sugar and refined flour. Your doctor sees no problem with them because they are fat-free.
The year is 2018. Your doctor tells you red meat causes cancer. The evidence is a hazard ratio of 1.18, which in any other field of science would be considered noise. Your doctor does not mention this. Nobody told your doctor either.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. Protein is back. Saturated fat is being quietly rehabilitated. Refined carbs are, at last, the villain they were always going to be.
None of the doctors who told you otherwise have phoned to apologise.
None of the institutions that enforced the last position have issued a correction.
The file simply updates. The old guidance vanishes from the website. The textbooks get reprinted. The medical students are taught the new version as if the old version never existed, and the patients who spent forty years doing what they were told are expected to quietly update their diets and move on.
Your great-grandmother was right. Your grandmother was right. Your mother, who followed the guidelines, is on three medications.
The pattern is not subtle.
The pattern has never been subtle.
The only question is how many more cycles of this you are willing to sit through before you stop asking the people who got the last one wrong what to do about the next one.
@TheKevinDalton@HunnyBplus3 The scary thing is, this community has good reviews and looks like an upscale place! The victim’s daughter installed cameras in her room after her mom was diagnosed with dementia. Otherwise, the abuse would’ve kept continuing. I can’t believe this guy got released on bail.
Two leftist “watchers” were chasing an ICE vehicle.
The ICE officer swerved to fake getting on the exit ramp. Then back to the highway.
The two leftist chase cars crashed into each other. 🤣
BREAKING:
This is wild one.
DHS announces the ICE arrest of a Liberian illegal alien who they say was working as a Minnesota corrections officer while also being AWOL from the PA National Guard, all while masquerading as a U.S. citizen despite having no legal status in the U.S. DHS says 45-year-old Morris Brown was identified as part of the major operation into MN investigating aliens involved in fraud.
He’s also alleged to have committed marriage fraud and made repeated false claims to U.S. immigration authorities.
Full details 👇🏻
😔😥😔 You can feel the pain in Tom Homan’s voice when he talks about children rescued from child trafficking.
As a woman & a mother, I’m 💔
"We just found one two days ago. A 14-year-old little girl. Living with two adult males. Who trafficked her. We found her, she’s pregnant. From trafficking forced into prostitution. 14 years old. We are taking care of her. Both physically and mentally.
Despite what the media says, we are not heartless. We care about these kids. I am a father. I’ve held dying children. I’ve held dead children. I’ve talked to little girls as young as 9 that were raped multiple times by the criminal cartels. You never forget it. When you get on your knees to talk to a 9 year old girl, when everything innocent & pure was ripped from her & she doesn’t believe in humanity anymore after having a bunch of animals crawl on her, taking everything from her. You never forget it.
That shit is happening every day. We are going to put an end to it.”
Thank GOD for TOM HOMAN 🙏
Bret Weinstein says that if he could go back, he would not vaccinate his newborn children.
“I believe the adverse events from regular old vaccines are far more common than we imagine, including things like allergies.”
“I believe that my allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused my immune system to react to something normal in my gut in a way that I will never be free from.”
“One of my sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to get in his way.”
“The other has an allergy to dairy… What I now think is that he developed an allergy very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine.”
“Given all of that education that I have now painfully received, if I had it to do all over again, I would not end up giving any vaccines to my newborn children.”
“I’m not saying it’s impossible that any of them are more beneficial than they are harmful, but I now know that I cannot trust the safety testing.”
A lot of people think "DEI" is lame diversity seminars or racial slogans at NFL games. In reality, it was a deliberate program of discrimination primarily against white men. This is an incredible piece that describes the evil of DEI and its consequences:
https://t.co/fMiIfvz0qz