omar

[رفشاد بن رحيم @rifshadh]

@AbuIyaadSP said previously that Sh. Arafath and the company were not clean in the fithna of Ibn Hādhi and he said he never promoted them, but here is him quoting and promoting Sh. @Arafatbinhassan in a refutation against Khalid Abdur Rahman Misri, So why he is lying?

[Hikmah Publications @hikmahpubs]

Beautiful advice from Shaykh Khalid Dhafeeri @almadani_k.

Hopefully, it finds open hearts & attentive ears.

It reminds us of what Imam Muqbil used to say: If you truly recognized the plagues afflicting society, you wouldn’t be preoccupied with your brother from Ahl al-Sunnah.

[Gamal ibn Rabee @DeQuran]

[Het meest herhaalde vers in de Quran: waarom wordt het zo vaak herhaald?]

{Welke gunsten van jullie Heer zullen jullie dan ontkennen?}

Al-Baghawi رحمه الله zei:
“Deze aya wordt in deze soera herhaald om de gunst van Allah te benadrukken en om de herinnering eraan te versterken. Hij somt voor Zijn schepselen Zijn gunsten op en plaatst tussen iedere twee gunsten deze aya, om hen daarop te wijzen.”

[Daar us Sunnah @DaarusSunnah]

A Tremendous Advice by @almadani_k for Ahl as-Sunnah

Do not allow every disagreement that occurs elsewhere to enter your daʿwah and become a cause of division amongst you.

Occupy yourselves with spreading tawḥīd, the Sunnah and beneficial knowledge. Think well of your brothers, seek excuses for them, avoid the causes of hatred and division, and strive to strengthen love and brotherhood amongst Ahl as-Sunnah.

Many disagreements between brothers are, in reality, personal disagreements dressed in the clothing of manhaj.

Unite upon the Sunnah and the truth, and do not allow Shayṭān to find a way amongst you through division and dispute.

The Shaykh is the UK this weekend at @TawheedCardiff

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

To those who thought Fawwāz al-Madkhali was sincere in his campaign against the scholars.

Firstly, Fawwāz al-Madkhali was the one who informed us of a Saudi Shaykh who was imprisoned by the authorities specifically for speaking publicly about a foreign war and advising on which factions to side with. He is fully aware of the state’s strict policies on this matter. Yet, this is the exact same Fawwāz who is now aggressively demanding that Al-'Allamah 'Abdullah al-Bukhari issue a public verdict regarding the war in Sudan!

This clearly shows that he only wants to drag the Shaykh into trouble, because If he knows that speaking on foreign conflicts can lead directly to imprisonment, his demand for Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhari to speak on Sudan is not a sincere quest for fatwa regarding a Nāzilah. It is a calculated, malicious attempt to drag the Shaykh into political trouble and incite the authorities against him. And when the Shaykh doesn't speak, it used against him as a "silent mar'jiyyah"

Secondly, Some time ago, Fawwāz posted a video of Shaykh 'Arafāt, falsely portraying him as defying the government regulation. He tried to incite the authorities by claiming Shaykh 'Arafāt was banned from teaching, when in reality, the absolute most that could be said was that he lacked a specific permit for a public lesson (which the video was not even of, he has been refuted on that previously). Fawwāz tried to present himself as the sincere defender of the ruler’s regulations and the whistle-blower for the authority.

How can he blow the whistle on others while being flagrantly guilty of the exact same offense? Fawwāz himself was specifically and explicitly banned by the government from holding lessons and despite this direct ban, he held a dawrah in Al-Jubail, Saudi Arabia, from December 11 to 14, 2024. It was a large gathering of people (as he informed us himself) and over 100 participants followed online, he taught 6 books, and wrote Ijāzāh for the attendees. (Screen record of the channel where the classes were broadcasted and recorded audios were shared is attached)

Does this portray any sincerity to the rulers?

It is obvious that his writings are not coming from a place of sincerity but only to weaponize government regulations to destroy his opponents, while blatantly violating them himself.

Thirdly, when we (myself, Abu 'Affān 'Uthmān, and Abul 'Abbās 'Abdul-Kabīr) visited him at his house in October 2025, he was speaking against Shaykh 'Arafāt and Shaykh 'Abdulilāh Ar-Rifā'i. Yet, he couldn't mention a single mistake in their 'Aqīdah or Manhaj. His only complaint was that he was informed the duo had spoken against him in their private gatherings.

This portrayed to us that his issues against them were based entirely on self-interest. It made it perfectly clear to us that his opposition was not due to protective jealousy for the sake of Allah and he is willing to tear down Salafi scholars and divide the Ummah simply because he heard a rumor that his name was mentioned privately.

Do not be deceived by his plots. May Allah protect the Salafi youths from the plots of these people

Mubaarak Ismail
28/08/2026

[Abu Mu’ādh Taqweem @AbuMuadhTaqweem]

It is a blessing to be back visiting Madīnah once again.

On this ‘Umrah trip we have participants from London, Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Bolton, as well as the Netherlands, and even as far as Sydney, Australia.

I also had the pleasure of meeting with some of our beloved brothers from Nigeria @ArrisaalahPubs who are also visiting currently. It was very encouraging to hear about their da’wah efforts & the progress being made with their masjid project, may Allāh bless them & strengthen their da’wah further.

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

The arrogance of these individuals - who believed they know better than the senior scholars - did not start today. Even when senior scholars like Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd were openly praising Shaykh 'Arafāt, these people refused to accept it. They did not merely reject the scholars' commendations and recommendations, but they also actively cautioned others against the very individuals the senior scholars were praising.

Shaykh Rabī' explicitly recorded an audio encouraging the promotion of Shaykh 'Arafāt's classes, yet Abu 'Iyād proudly declares: "Hence, I never raised or promoted these individuals."

This proves that while the senior scholars were directing the Ummah in one direction, these individuals were secretly steering their followers in another.

Does this mean they also secretly believed the scholars were "deceived by their inner circle," just as the blind followers of Ibn Hādi claimed?

Why, then, do they suddenly present themselves today as the true upholders of the legacy of Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd? If they were already rejecting the explicit advice of Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd back then, why should anyone be surprised that they are rejecting the statements of Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhārī today?

This rebellious stance perfectly mirrors an encounter we (myself, Abu 'Affān 'Uthmān, and Abul 'Abbās 'Abdul-Kabīr) experienced firsthand on Jumu'ah, October 24, 2025 in the sitting room of Fawwāz al-Madkhali. We asked him about Shaykh Bandar al-Khaybari and he immediately launched into a tirade, insulting the Shaykh, as well as Shaykh 'Abdulilāh Ar-Rifā'i, Shaykh Ahmad Az-Zahrāni, and others.

After finishing his insults, Fawwāz said: "You see that these people that Muhammad bin Hādi spoke against, he was 100% correct in what he used in describing them..." He then proceeded to repeat the very insults Ibn Hādi had uttered against them, approving of them one by one, before concluding with the shocking claim: "Ibn Hādi was 100% correct in his description, only that he was hasty!"

May Allah bless the scholars who accurately stated that this current fitnah is merely a continuation of the fitnah of Muhammad bin Hādi.

May Allah protect us from their fitnah.

Mubaarak Ismail
27/9/2026

[Gamal ibn Rabee @DeQuran]

One of the strongest refutations of @AbuIyaadSP

[Gamal ibn Rabee @DeQuran]

We are still waiting for evidence from @AbuIyaadSP. If you speak about Ahlus-Sunnah, you must provide evidence. If you do not have any evidence, then repent!

https://t.co/FoCXCyjxoH

Where is the evidence for what you are saying here about @dr_albukhary and @Arafatbinhassan?

[Hamza Farah @Htiooooe]

الله المستعان.

It seems Bilal Salimi from Egypt has warned against taking knowledge from Shaykh Mawasi of Jeddah and Ustadh Lahmami. @Abdulilah_UK

This raises serious questions about those in Tower Hamlets @DawahTH like zubair Somali and others like Abu inyaah @Oxford_Dawahand and Abu khadeja son and others who promoted and ushered him in without apparently researching who he is, his methodology, and the people he is associated with.

They presented him as a “muhaddith from Egypt,” shows their extremism in raising people apparently in an effort to defend Abu Iyaad and attack mashayikh such as Shaykh Arafat and Shaykh Bukhari.

Now the consequences of this promotion are becoming apparent, with teachers such as Ustadh Lahmami and Shaykh Mawasi becoming targets.

So where does this leave SPUBS @SalafiPubs ? Their continued silence regarding the activities and promotions coming from Tower Hamlets, Abu inyaah and abdullah jallow @AbdullahJallow9 @salafidawahmcr has allowed young people in the West to become attached to figures whose positions they may not have properly understood.

If they genuinely care about protecting the youth from confusion, then they need to clarify where they stand regarding the positions of Abu Iyaad, Nizar and those promoting them including the figures in Tower Hamlets.

Otherwise, the youth will inevitably become confused and may end up abandoning reliable teachers such as Ustadh Lahmami and Shaykh Mawasi.

The link to bilal salimi warning against the two sheiks

https://t.co/aPwyUSdDgc

[أم عبدالله @DScPvTlY5Dzj26M]

الغنى أيضًا ابتلاء!

[Salafi Dawah Lancs @SalafiDawaLancs]

Know the Scholars of Hadith....Brief Biographies

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 Refuting the False Claims of al-Hudhaifī and Abū Iyāḍ and Exposing Their Inconsistencies

🖊️ Written by: Abū Kawthar Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

ʿAlī al-Hudhaifī, Abū Iyāḍ, and Bilāl as-Sālimī have all made statements concerning the scholarly standing of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī. Yet Bilāl previously described him as one of the foremost scholars of al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl and among the most prominent representatives of the field, whereas today his scholarly standing is being denied and undermined.

➤ Their own statements expose the contradiction.

📎 https://t.co/rlINPaEE5l

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

Abu Iyaad and his cohorts have split the Salafiyoon just like Ibn Hadi did but Al-hamdulillah the Scholars are not with him and his affair has been made clear to the sincere ones

[Moosaa Richardson أبو العباس موسى الطويل @1MMeducation]

Sh Rabee' taught me by direct advice & through his example: When people speak ill of you (w/out right), it is a burden THEY bear, not you.

[Abu Hakeem Bilal @AbuHakeemBilal]

Allahu Akbar! We would repeatedly hear the same from the Shaikh throughout our years of clinging to him! By Allah Golden Advice of a true Rabbaani!

[عبد الله الألباني @happiness9991]

Speaking of integrity, remember your lie against the messenger of Allah ﷺ.

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📹 NEW VIDEO

⚠️ Refuting the Deceptive Claim of "Returning to the Quran" to Evade the Scholars | Sh. Fuad Az-Zintānĩ

Download here:
https://t.co/JV3d4L9Kff

📡 Follow the “Gatherings of Knowledge” on https://t.co/ESDkwIaCVC

━───✨✦📚✦✨───━

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

Fawwāz al-Madkhalī Clarifies the Error of Their Kurdish Group and Their Misunderstanding of the Ḥadīth of Dhāt Anwāṭ

Written by: Shaykh ʿAbdul-Bāsiṭ al-Mashhadānī (May Allah preserve him)

➤ Translated by: Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

📎 https://t.co/LNHqI84766

Abū Iyāḍ, while defending Dānā ʿAbd Allāh, accused Shaykh ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī of misrepresenting the issue of Dhāt Anwāṭ. However, Fawwāz al-Madkhalī—whom they consider one of their scholars—stated that their Kurdish group was mistaken and misunderstood the ḥadīth.

Why the inconsistency, either Dānā ʿAbd Allāh was wrong, as Fawwāz said, or he was correct, as Abū Iyāḍ’s defence suggests. If he was wrong, then why is Shaykh ʿArafāt’s criticism of that mistake called “misrepresentation,” “distortion,” or “pseudo-scholarship”?

[omar @omarrrr020]

@happiness9991 May Allah rectify their affairs. Their mistakes and actions can’t be overlooked. Allahu musta’an