@therealsherra why would you think the maker rebates are going to disappear? I think they might be cut to cover for taker rebates, but not necessarily.
@lookonchain We’ve been there so many times already before: there always appears some new dude on the platform without a real understanding how the platform works and donates the money to the Whales
There is nothing much to do really. If for some reason the team / UMA rules in favor of YES holders, the same wave of posts will come from NO holders (who are trading according to the last additional context from the team, so they are clearly winning the bet). In such markets with tight resolutions there always will be, unfortunately, one side strongly disagreeing with the resolution.
What anyone can do now is buy NO ~99.3c and get >1000% APY.
'Confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify' - UMA will vote accordingly.
I know this sucks and hurts for everyone who bought YES - been in your shoes before, but no crying in the casino
@jonatanpallesen True. The crying part was not addressed at you, but to the general discorouse I see on X today.
Your suggestions are very relevant and useful - adding as much details and info as possible to the Rules won’t hurt in general.
@br_betting@FDSportsbook If it is a free bet, take the largest odds (Arnaldi) / wait for him to reach the Final (quite possible looking at his part of the bracket) / cover by betting on the side
@SebastianGallic@Polymarket Isn't is easier to buy all you can from the market at 0.8c? You can literally load up millions of shares for thousands of investment.
@fozzydiablo UMA will definitely vote NO and there’s nothing Polymarket can do about that at this point.
They clarified the rules and now it is impossible to vote YES.