Based on community feedback, we’re raising the initial deposit cap to $250 million to support fair inclusion and broad participation.
Individual deposits will be limited to $50 million.
Read our FAQs for more details.
@mtndrew ... could be fine, but the eco has to develop & keep pace. feeling pessimistic with all new chains flopping lately. buuutt, gud narrative goes a long way.
@mtndrew Yeah, fair. Curious to see how zero-fee usdt txns plays out. Was wondering how they'd make money when mission no.1 is free. Seems like they're just betting on the eco that'll chase the flows. All I hear is heavy early on validator subsidies ...
withdrawal process for @ostium $OLP should be illegal lol
> deposited 5/3
> had to wait until 5/6 to submit a request to withdraw
> won't be able to withdraw until 5/17
> misses withdraw on 5/17 and now have to wait 3 to submit new request
> next available withdraw 5/29
withdrawal process for @ostium $OLP should be illegal lol
> deposited 5/3
> had to wait until 5/6 to submit a request to withdraw
> won't be able to withdraw until 5/17
> misses withdraw on 5/17 and now have to wait 3 to submit new request
> next available withdraw 5/29
i see new points page dropped on testnet
assuming retroactive points will be a go (praying), but big question is if they're gonna be disproportionately favoring EVM over exchange
i looked at stocks for like a couple months and now and i can't look at a crypto project without looking at p/f ratios
this was never the place for that i gotta chill
"$ZORA is for fun only"
Why does team need to keep 65% of a token that's for fun only?
Why would a project maintain a treasury of a worthless "for fun only" token?
Why would contributors want to receive 26% of the supply of a worthless token that entitles them to nothing?