Only One Way

Follower of Christ. Exposing deception and false religions. Proclaiming the Gospel. Standing for truth. One Cross. One Savior. One Truth. Jesus Christ is Lord.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Here is one of the many scientific blunders where Muhammad claimed that water is pure and can't be defiled by anything. He clearly had no idea bacteria existed and neither did allah, since Muhammad never speaks on his own but rather he only says what allah reveals to him. Here is that massive scientific blunder:

Sunan Abi Dawud 66(Sahih)

Narrated AbuSa'id al-Khudri:
The people asked the Messenger of Allah: Can we perform ablution out of the well of Buda'ah, which is a well into which menstrual clothes, dead dogs and stinking things were thrown? He replied: Water is pure and is not defiled by anything.

Here Muhammad was telling people that they can perform ablution in a well that had menstrual rags and dead dogs in it because water is pure & can't be defiled by anything! Obviously we know that germs/bacteria will definitely be present in dirty water that has rotting corpses of dogs & menstrual rags etc in it but yet Muhammad claimed that it's safe to perform ablution in that well.

Was Muhammad right?

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

The Mustard seed dilemma? This isn’t a botanical error. Mark 4:31 is a parable using ordinary agricultural language. The Greek γῆ (gē) can mean “ground” or “land,” and the mustard seed was the smallest of the seeds commonly sown by farmers in that region. “All the seeds” is contextual, not a scientific claim about every species of seed on planet Earth. Jesus’ point is that something beginning extremely small can grow into something remarkably large.

All you had to do was look at the interlinear.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Jesus did not stop being God when He became man. Christianity teaches that the eternal Son assumed a complete human nature while remaining fully divine. This is the hypostatic union: one person, two natures, fully God and fully human.

We already affirm that Jesus truly became man. Repeating that belief with “MAN” in capital letters does nothing to refute it. You need to demonstrate why God the Son could not take on human nature while remaining God. Simply expressing disbelief is not an argument.

[itachi @dawahxdialogues]

One day, many Christians will look back and ask themselves:

“How did I ever believe that the Almighty God, the Creator of the universe was a MAN?”

Hopefully they realize the mistake before it’s too late.

Ameen.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@Biggidj7 @allwewantpeace It's exactly what your leader taught.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@schift_official @thsottiaux Always check Tibo's X posts before you use a banked reset. Hours ago he announced a reset was coming. If you checked his X account, you would've seen it and you wouldn't have wasted a banked reset.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@PlasticBacked @vxbe_dev @thsottiaux If you're a Christian, don't cuss and use our Lords name as the very next word.

Ephesians 3:8
"But now you yourselves are to put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy language out of your mouth."

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@WilsonTimo40021 @thsottiaux What is that approve for me bug doing exactly?

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Quran and sunnah being precise? I agree with you. Like how the quran says the sun sets in a spring of muddy water and then muslims claim it was from Dhul-Qarnayn’ perspective but then Muhammad refutes that understanding in a sahih hadith by claiming as a fact that the sun sets in a spring of water.

Notice how Muhammad did not say that the sun sets in a spring of water from HIS perspective.

He said it literally sets in a spring of warm water because he is the author of the quran so he simply repeated what he previously stated in the quran proving the quran is NOT from God!

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Do you pluck your eyebrows? If you do, I'm sorry to tell you thst Muhammad says you're cursed.

Sunan Ibn Majah 1989(sahih)
It was narrated that 'Abdulleh said:

"The Messenger of Allah cursed the woman who
does tattoos and the one who has them done, and those who pluck their eyebrows and file their teeth for the purpose of beautification, and those who change the creation of Allah."

Are you okay with being under a curse for simply plucking your eyebrows? Is that fair?

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Jesus said, "Go and sin no more."

That's something we would expect God to say.

But what does your allah say?

Sahih Muslim 2749
By Him in Whose Hand is my life, if you were not to commit sin, Allah would sweep you out of existence and He would replace (you by) those people who would commit sin and seek forgiveness from Allah, and He would have pardoned them.

The devil wants us to sin and in islam, allah wants you to sin. Therefore, who does that make allah? 🤔

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Views like these have me pondering how blessed I am to worship the true Triune God, rather than a false pagan moon god named allah who appeared out of nowhere in the seventh century, has no connection to the true God of the Bible, and has muslims participating in pagan practices that none of the previous true prophets practised at any point in history.

There is not a single mention of these practices in any book of the Bible or any earlier historical source, yet we are expected to believe that Abraham built the kaaba. Not a single eyewitness. Not a single contemporary report. Not a shred of historical evidence connecting Abraham to Mecca.

The entire claim rests on the word of Muhammad, who lived thousands of years later. That is not history supported by evidence; it is an unsupported islamic claim that muslims blindly accept as fact.

[Korra The Taymi @korrathetaymi]

Views like these have me pondering on how lucky I am to worship Allah and not a man.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@therealdisasm @JayDyer Do you agree with this?

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Praying to Mary, telling her that ALL your hope is in her and then asking her to protect you is not only unbiblical, it's idolatry.

Our hope should be in God and in Him alone. Only He is able to protect us.

[CleavetoAntiquity @C2Antiquity]

@IndianaBrunner In thee O Mother of God I place all my hope, keep me under thy protection ☦️

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@C2Antiquity @IndianaBrunner Imagine putting ALL your hope in a human instead of in God. If you put all your hope in Mary then you can't have any hope in God. This is 100% idolatry.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@C2Antiquity @IndianaBrunner Thanks for showing us why we should never go against God by becoming Orthodox.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

Us Christians don't need to insult you. Your false prophet did enough of that already.

Sahih al-Bukhari 304
Once Allah's Messenger went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) of `Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Messenger?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you."

[Maki @MakiTheSalafi]

Every time a Christian insults islam, and us women
It reinforces that I made the correct decision to leave Christianity.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@Kryptotajeer Then explain Sunan Abi Dawud 4002: Muhammad says the sun sets in a warm spring, echoing quran 18:86. If the hadith is true, it confirms the quran’s scientific error. If false despite a sahih chain, then your claim that sahih hadiths reliably trace back to Muhammad is false.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

History is against you. Your false god steals from the previous scriptures (Torah, Zuboor and Injeel), then claims he revealed those scriptures while simultaneously contradicts it.

Then you muslims try to clear up allahs mess by claiming all 3 previous scriptures were corrupted, and by making that claim, you've now made your god dumb for putting his own divine scriptures into the hands of people who he knew would corrupt it! And he did this 3 times in a row?!

On top of that, he made the claim that no one can change his words but you guys claim that his words can be changed?

To be a muslim, you have to believe that your god is a monumental failure and a liar, because you don't believe him when he said NO ONE can change his words!

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

@Deenresponds Says the guy who is milking the Lily Jay story for views and ad revenue on Youtube. Everyone knows about the story, yet Deen has made countless videos on Lily Jay including recap videos as if his subscribers didn't see his previous 50 videos.

[Only One Way @only_one_way__]

HOW ONE SAHIH HADITH CREATES A MASSIVE DILEMMA FOR ISLAM.

The quran describes Dhul-Qarnayn travelling west:

“...he reached the setting place of the sun, [and] he found it setting in a spring of dark mud.”
—quran 18:86

The Arabic says he found the sun setting in a spring. It does not say “as if,” “appeared to him” or “seemed to be.” Those words are added by modern translators.

Muslims argue that this only describes what Dhul-Qarnayn saw, like saying the sun “set in the water.”

A hadith undermines that defence.

Abu Dharr reported that Muhammad asked where the sun sets. When Abu Dharr replied, “Allah and His Messenger know best,” Muhammad answered:

“It sets in a spring of warm water.”
—Sunan Abi Dawud 4002

Muhammad was not describing Dhul-Qarnayn’s perspective. He asked where the sun sets and gave “a spring of warm water” as the answer. He did not say it merely appeared to set there.

This proves that Muhammad understood quran 18:86 literally. One account says muddy and the other warm, but both locate the sun’s setting in water.

If the hadith is authentic, the “visual perspective” defence collapses.

Muslim apologists therefore argue that this wording is unreliable because other versions say that the sun prostrates beneath Allah’s throne without mentioning a spring.

That creates another serious problem.

Sunan Abi Dawud 4002 was graded “sahih in chain” by al-Albani, and al-Hakim also regarded its chain as sahih. Its narrators were deemed trustworthy.

Muslim Apologists still claim the wording is false because it conflicts with reports in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. They suggest that a trusted narrator transmitted an incorrect version through faulty memory or a hidden defect.

Islam is left with a massive dilemma.

Either Muhammad said that the sun sets in a spring, in which case he made a scientific error and confirmed a literal reading of quran 18:86;

or Muhammad never said it, in which case trustworthy transmitters using a chain graded sahih falsely placed words into Muhammad’s mouth.

Muslims may answer that scholars compare reports and reject weaker versions. But that concedes the point: trustworthy narrators and a continuous chain are not enough to prove that Muhammad spoke the words attributed to him.

This means that the label “sahih” does not guarantee that a report is true.

This is a theological problem because the hadiths are foundational to Islam. The quran does not provide all the details required to practise the religion. Daily prayers, fasting, pilgrimage and many other doctrines depend upon the hadiths.

If Allah established Islam and intended Muslims to rely upon hadiths, then Allah was responsible for providing a reliable way to distinguish Muhammad’s teachings from false statements.

An all-knowing God would know that Muslims depend upon these reports. An all-powerful God could preserve them without allowing false statements to enter the religion disguised as authentic ones.

Yet Muslims are forced to argue that a sahih chain of trustworthy narrators may contain words Muhammad never spoke.

One false hadith does not prove every hadith false. But once false wording can pass through a sahih chain, “sahih” can no longer prove that any particular report is true.

Rejecting Abu Dawud 4002 saves Muhammad from one scientific error only by damaging confidence in the system that supposedly preserved his teachings.

If the hadith is true, Islam is false because it confirms that a supposed all-knowing god believes the sun actually sets in water.

If the hadith is false, Islam is also false, because the hadiths form a major part of Islamic belief, practice and law. And if even a single hadith classified as sahih can falsely attribute words to Muhammad, then the classification itself cannot guarantee authenticity of any hadith.

For the system to remain reliable, all sahih hadiths must be trustworthy. Otherwise, Muhammad’s genuine teachings cannot be distinguished from false reports attributed to him.