Britain is a speck. Africa is a continent. Only a suicidal idiot pretends we can swallow it whole.
Look again at that map. The blue outline isnât some random African blob, itâs England, our entire island nation, dropped onto the vastness of Africa for scale.
One tiny, rain-soaked, historically English rock placed against the Democratic Republic of Congo alone, a country nearly ten times our size.
Africa itself could swallow the British Isles dozens of times over and barely notice.
Yet the same people who lecture us about âcompassionâ and âdiversityâ insist this postage stamp of a homeland must fling open its doors to endless hordes from that continent and beyond.
What utter, manipulative bollocks.
Africa spans over 30 million square kilometres with 54 countries and 1.4 billion people and growing faster than anywhere on Earth.
Nigeria alone will hit 400 million by 2050. Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea vast territories, immense resources, yet perpetual chaos, tribal slaughter, corruption, and fertility rates that mock any notion of sustainability.
Their young men arenât âfleeingâ because thereâs literally nowhere else on their gigantic continent; theyâre coming here because Europeâs idiot elites turned welfare magnets into beacons for the worldâs surplus population.
England is not ânowhere else to go.â It is the only homeland our people have ever known.
A finite island forged by the English, for the English.
the descendants of those who tamed it, defended it, and built the greatest civilisation this planet has seen.
We are already 67 million strong on these crowded shores, with native birth rates suppressed and our cities groaning under the weight of parallel societies, knife crime, grooming gangs, and collapsing services.
Every additional boatload whether Pakistani, Nigerian, Somali, or Afghan whatever Tom dick and Harry, isnât enrichment. Itâs dilution. Itâs dispossession.
The intellectual reality, delivered without the usual cowardly euphemisms: this cannot work.
It has never worked.
You do not transplant tens of millions from low-trust, low-IQ, high-fertility, clan-based, often cousin-marrying cultures, many steeped in the supremacist ideology of Islam or worse into a high-trust, high-investment, native European society and expect harmony.
You get what we already see in Newham, Tower Hamlets, Bradford, and Birmingham: electoral capture by foreign blocs, no-go areas, skyrocketing welfare dependency, and native English families priced out or driven out.
Europeâs strange death, accelerated by a pathological altruism that mistakes weakness for virtue.
We owe these people nothing.
The natives of these isles built this country. We paid for it. We died for it. It belongs to us.
Remigration on a serious, unapologetic scale is not âfar-right extremism.â It is basic arithmetic and national survival.
Prioritise the English people in their own homeland.
Africa has space.
The Middle East has space.
Pakistan has space.
Let them fix their own failures instead of exporting them to the one place that still works, for now.
England is our only home.
Tiny, precious, irreplaceable.
Weâve had enough of pretending otherwise.
The hordes keep coming only because traitorous elites allow it.
Time to reclaim our birthright, and ensure that this sceptred isle remains English.
Anything less is national suicide sold as kindness.
The map doesnât lie. Neither should we.
BREAKING: Maryland becomes first state to ban AI âdynamic pricingâ in grocery stores.
This means 49 other states still allow it.
Dynamic pricing already runs airlines, hotels, and rideshares. Groceries are the next frontier.
Here's how it works:
Grocery stores use AI, digital price tags, and cameras to track YOUR behavior.
Then they set the price based on what they think YOU will pay. Not what the item is worth.
AI technology is making this possible:
- Digital shelf tags that update in real time
- Aisle cameras that track shopper behavior
- Apps that shift from search-based to predictive
- AI that learns your purchase history, income signals, and price ceiling
- Real-time cart tracking to spot when demand is surging
The store's AI takes all of that and figures out YOUR price.
Not the market price. Not a fair price. YOUR price, based on what you're willing to pay.
This is terrifying. This manipulation is pure greed.
Maryland just banned it. The Protection from Predatory Pricing Act makes it the first state to outlaw dynamic pricing in grocery stores.
Technology should serve us. We should not serve technology.
Parents control the devices they allow their kids to have.
Parents control the parental controls on/off switch.
PARENTS. HAVE. CONTROL.
Parents are, and HAVE BEEN, responsible for THEIR KIDS tech activity and online safety.
We cannot have sustainable energy because it threatens the oil industry. We cannot have healthcare because it threatens insurance. We cannot have peace because it threatens the weapons industry. Capitalism built a system where doing the right thing is treated like bad business.
@econ_is_awesome@ArtemisConsort That'd be within the purview of statistics no? Knowing appropriate methodology and being able to parse that language. Maybe every rwinger should take a statistics class
Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT.
The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time.
A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B.
Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself.
GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won.
Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective.
It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect.
Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance.
99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time.
If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars.
Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
Interviewer: âWhat do you think of Birmingham Cathedral?â
Man: âItâs shit, but itâs a nice place to smoke weed. Itâs not my ancestors! I donât know whose ancestors those are.â
The lack of respect for our religion and culture is abhorrent.