We want to put papers back in the hands of their creators.
Every researcher knows this feeling:
That moment you sign the copyright transfer. The moment your discovery stops being yours.
We're ending this. We put your ownership on-chain. Verifiably and immutable.
#DeSci
To search the Medicaid Provider Spending dataset:
1. Download it (10.32 GB) from the HHS Open Data platform at https://t.co/xe7x0MkW4G (search for "Medicaid Provider Spending").
2. It's aggregated tabular data (likely CSV) by provider, procedure code, month (2018-2024).
3. Use Python for analysis: import pandas as pd; df = https://t.co/c5jTYvc22p_csv('file.csv'); # Filter e.g., df[df['procedure_code'] == 'code'] or df[df['provider_id'] == 'id']. For large files, use Dask.
4. To detect anomalies like fraud, group by code/location and plot trends with matplotlib.
Today the HHS DOGE team open sourced the largest Medicaid dataset in department history.
This dataset contains aggregated, provider-level claims data for a specific billing code over time.
For example, using this dataset, it would have been possible to easily detect the large-scale autism diagnosis fraud seen in Minnesota.
Download the data yourself:
https://t.co/6h2c6loE9y
The absence of citations doesn’t mean Einstein worked in isolation or that his work was biased. At the time, citation norms were different, especially in theoretical physics. His arguments stand on logic, mathematical consistency, and empirical testability which we all know as the real validators.
A solid foundation doesn’t require constant attribution when the framework is already part of the field’s shared knowledge. Einstein demonstrated full command of that foundation and took end-to-end responsibility for the proof.
The fact that his conclusions were later verified independently is the strongest evidence that the work wasn’t even fiction, bias, or guesswork.
It's obviously a rigorous execution.
The absence of citations doesn’t mean Einstein worked in isolation or that his work was biased. At the time, citation norms were different, especially in theoretical physics. His arguments stand on logic, mathematical consistency, and empirical testability which we all know as the real validators.
A solid foundation doesn’t require constant attribution when the framework is already part of the field’s shared knowledge. Einstein demonstrated full command of that foundation and took end-to-end responsibility for the proof.
The fact that his conclusions were later verified independently is the strongest evidence that the work wasn’t even fiction, bias, or guesswork.
It's obviously a rigorous execution.
Past, present, and future may all exist at once.
Here’s why your experience of “now” might be a mental glitch.
What if time doesn’t actually move? Philosopher Adrian Bardon proposes that our sense of time “flowing” is just a mental glitch—a cognitive construction rather than a feature of the universe itself.
In his latest book, Bardon draws on physics and neuroscience to argue that our perception of time is not about time itself, but how our brains interpret change. Much like we don’t see infrared light or hear ultrasound, we don’t perceive time directly—we manufacture the experience internally.
This idea aligns with modern physics. Einstein’s theory of relativity shattered the concept of an absolute present, showing that time is relative depending on your speed and position.
Today, physicists often describe the universe as a four-dimensional “block” where past, present, and future all coexist. In that model, nothing actually flows; instead, we experience different slices of reality as if we’re flipping through the frames of a film. Bardon suggests that our brains impose the illusion of movement—just like they assign color to wavelengths or pain to injury—giving us a narrative of time that feels real, but might not be.
Source: Bardon, A. (2025). "What is time? Rather than something that ‘flows,’ a philosopher suggests time is a psychological projection." The Conversation.
Honored to be recognized by @SuperteamNG as foundational infrastructure in the ecosystem.
As they said: "A seamless infrastructure is what converts innovation into real adoption."
That's the mission with openQuanta - believe it, that's what publishing should be in today's world and we're building it.
@PhysInHistory The clock maker understands the quantum mechanics
Every tick of a second effects on minute, to hour, to day, to weeks, month and year even unto evolution