Kuato

1A/2A Utilizer Conservative Simple Living/Higher Thinking American Nationalist

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

Dear American friends, it's a mystery to me how you can tolerate such a traitor in your midst. You went to the barricades over a three-pence-per-pound tea tax, yet you tolerate someone who is so obviously acting as a hostile agent among you?

[Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu]

‼️EXPOSED: Internal FBI Report Details How Kash Patel REFUSED To Get Off His Plane In PROVO Until Agents Found Him an FBI Raid Jacket Borrowed From A FEMALE Agent.😮

A damning internal report compiled by current and former FBI agents details how Director Kash Patel handled the Charlie Kirk investigation in Utah.

According to multiple sources inside the Bureau:
• Patel arrived at Provo Airport on September 11 and refused to get off the plane without an FBI raid jacket. Agents had to scramble to find a medium-sized one (from a female Special Agent) while in the middle of the investigation. He then refused to leave until SWAT members removed patches from their own uniforms and ran them over to him.

• Before arriving, Patel called Salt Lake City SAC Robert Bohls, yelled at him, and asked if he needed to come out and run the investigation himself. He later delivered an expletive-laden tirade at Bohls. Dan Bongino had to call afterward and apologize.

• Agents say Patel broke FBI tradition by taking public credit for the work of other agencies and implying the results wouldn’t have been possible without him.

• Multiple sources criticized Patel for revealing far too many details of the evidence in the Charlie Kirk case to the public — something experienced agents say damaged the integrity of the ongoing investigation. They attributed it to his lack of real law-enforcement leadership experience.

• At the September 11 press conference in Utah, sources said Patel appeared uneasy, with his eyes darting around the room.
This is the leadership that was in charge of the Charlie Kirk investigation from day one.
READ THE FULL REPORT BELOW: Charlie Kirk Provo plane incident starts on Page 27
Tag @RealCandaceO, RT this.

[HealthRanger @HealthRanger]

I assume you all know this already, but just in case:

The entire frenzy last year over TikTok being owned by China and the claims that China was using it to indoctrinate America with "wokeism" turned out to be a psyop to scare Congress into passing a law requiring TikTok to be sold to Zionists so they could censor criticism of Israel.

And that's exactly what has happened since.

The "blame China" narrative was always a psyop to concentrate control of the platform into the hands of Zionist censors.

[Monty Fritts @MontyFritts4TN]

D.C. politicians are pushing data centers and Flock cameras on Tennessee.

Our clean water, clean air, clean soil, and our private information are not for sale.

We need a Governor who will stand up to the corporate and globalist establishments — not roll over for them.

Let’s fight for our families and our farmers so we can keep eating healthy food and protect our privacy.

Vote Fritts for Governor on August 6th.

[Kuato @openyourmind]

@SenTedCruz

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

@takenaps The irony of the MAGA slop grift:

it’s funded by Miriam Adelson, who convinced Trump to wreck MAGA and his administration in the process.

[The Dibster @TheDibsterX]

YET ANOTHER LYING BASTARD IN THE TYLER ROBINSON CASE !!

Officer Christopher (Chris) Bagley who was the first officer that went to the roof committed perjury in court.

HE KNEW EXTREMELY WELL WHO THAT OTHER PERSON ON THE ROOF WAS ... but pretended he did not know and did not care to know.

Also, his body-cam stopped working? A camera with a battery that lasts 14 hours?? This smells to me like BULL.......

👉 Watch the video!

He should be arrested and prosecuted for lying to the court.

Thank you @RealCandaceO for uncovering YET another lying bastard in this case!

[Travis @NihiloX]

Candace, Tucker, and Megyn Kelly all received immediate threats following Charlie Kirk’s horrific assassination.

These threats have absolutely nothing to do with transgenderism.

The individuals responsible for Charlie’s death needed to control the narrative.

Who were the most prominent conservative voices known for challenging official narratives and were also friends of Charlie’s on September 10, 2025?

Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly.

The individuals responsible for Charlie’s murder could have easily anticipated those three being a massive threat to the coverup at hand.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨#BREAKING: Police in Winona Minnesota are stunned after EVERY SINGLE ONE of their Flock cameras were suddenly removed in a single night.

According to the police department, all 8 of the town's cameras were cut down and hauled away.

Police are asking for the public's help to identify the individual, but the public has been leaving comments like:

"The Flock cameras tore themselves down"
"Whoever did it, was fishing with me"
"Whoever it was, was at Bible study with me"

[Kuato @openyourmind]

@ChuckGrassley

[Monty Fritts @MontyFritts4TN]

Are you tired of the government overreaching its authority by monitoring everything we do?

These automatic license plate readers, or "FLOCK Cameras," are such a problem, and I'm against them.

Vote for no Flock Cameras. Vote for Fritts.

[Monty Fritts @MontyFritts4TN]

Some liberal fake-news outlets will twist words and call me a “Christian Nationalist.” I don’t care what you call me.

As your next Governor, I will uplift the name of Jesus Christ — and I will stay firmly within the bounds of that Constitution.

I’m committed to Jesus Christ and the Constitution. Vote Fritts for Governor on August 6th.

[Abolition Women @AbolitionWomen]

🗣️Let's talk about TENNESSEAN'S donations to candidates.🗣️

💰Monty Fritts’s campaign is 9% self-funded, 9% PAC funded (two TN based PACs) and 82% funded by individual donations. Over ⭐9️⃣7️⃣%⭐ of those individual donations are from Tennesseans.

💰John Rose’s campaign is 83% candidate funded, 2% PAC funded (13 PACs), and 15% individual donations with 💵9️⃣4️⃣%💵of those donations from Tennesseans.

💰Marsha Blackburn’s campaign is 13% PAC funded (122 PACs) and 87% funded by individual donations. Only 😲2️⃣3️⃣%😲 of the individual donations given were from Tennesseans.

How did I get these numbers? Let’s use Blackburn as an example. When I pulled the campaign finance reports, there were a total of 43,322 individual donations reported. Of those, 10,232 were from the state of Tennessee, equaling 23%. The same calculation was used for Fritts and Rose.

————-
I’m voting @MontyFritts4TN!

[Kuato @openyourmind]

@VoteMarsha

[Steve Baker @SteveBakerUSA]

I’ve not seen this go viral yet, but @DeptofWar has gone too far. I’ll let the theologians have a go at this … but I don’t need to be a Biblical scholar for this to make my stomach knot up. This is way out of context, and way over the line.

[Monty Fritts @MontyFritts4TN]

Why on earth would you hire one of the other candidates who have spent years in Congress? Aren't they a part of the problem?

There's a BETTER choice for Governor!

Vote Fritts for Governor. Don't D.C. my Tennessee! Vote for Liberty & Less Government!

[Derrick Evans @DerrickEvans4WV]

James Fishback has ran the most based campaign I’ve ever seen.

We need more of this in politics.

[The Real Mike Rowe @mikeroweworks]

Not the way I planned on spending my afternoon, but 7,600 comments should not be ignored! Bots, trolls and personal attacks notwithstanding, the critics of yesterday’s post were dominated by a large and vocal contingent who rushed to remind me that there’s “a difference between socialism and communism,” an obvious indication that they didn’t actually read the post.

Shelley Armour writes… “Mike! You know there is a difference between democratic socialism and communism, right?”

Hi, Shelley. Yes, I know there’s a difference, and I understand what the difference is. The larger point, and the fundamental flaw with your comment, is that you seem to believe the candidates within the Democratic Socialist Party are both “democratic and socialist" simply because that’s the name of their club. Well, maybe some of them are. I really couldn’t say. What I can tell you for sure is that more than a few have called for the complete dismantling of capitalism, free markets, representative government, property rights, borders, police, prisons, and the Constitution in general. My post referred to them, as well as a number of elected Democrats who have agreed to campaign on their behalf – including Gavin Newsom, who said, "The Democratic Party must accept the DSA in order to take back the Congress.” His words, not mine.

Tracey Steele writes…“Wow! I cannot believe Mike Rowe said this. He has a huge reach, and he is actually spouting the word “communism” like it’s the 1950s! Wow Wow Wow!”

Wow indeed, Tracey, and thanks for noticing the size of my reach! (Contrary to popular belief, size does matter!) To say it again, I am not the one “spouting” communism or conflating socialists and communists. The word is being “spouted” by members of the DSA who are using it to describe themselves. I am not accusing them; I am quoting them.

John Engles… Hey Rowe, what’s the difference between the Communists who want to run the country and the Nazi/fascist who currently is?

Several differences, John, but the only one relevant to this conversation is the fact that the communists currently running for office have clearly identified themselves as such. They do not dispute or reject the label. They embrace it. It is who they are, who they claim to be, and who they want to be. The president, on the other hand, has never claimed to be a Nazi or a fascist. That doesn’t mean he isn't, but it is worth noting he has rejected the accusation outright. Obviously, you are entitled to that opinion and the right to share it publicly, thanks to our Constitution. Unlike in a fascist, Nazi, or communist regime. (Also worth noting, Nazis and fascists are not the same thing.)

Chris Tomaloff writes… “Kinda like how the political right didn’t shout down the extreme rhetoric coming from their candidates?”

No, Chris, not like that at all. In the video I shared, we saw examples of prominent Democrats saying things like, “We need to elect more communists!” (Cea Weaver, Director of the NYC Mayor’s Office.) Mamdani himself literally tweeted, "Each according to their need, each according to their ability." That’s a direct quote from the Communist Manifesto.

But what exactly is the corollary from the right? Are prominent Republicans tweeting, “We need to elect more Nazis! We need to elect more fascists! Eat the poor!” I don’t think so. John Engles may think Trump is fascist and a Nazi, but Trump disagrees, and so do a majority of voters. Communists, on the other hand, say it loud and say it proud. I’m inclined to take them at their word.

Beto Ojeda… “Mike has always leaned to the Trumpian view of things but never states it, so as not to alienate anyone, but we know how to read between the lines. This “communist” talk is McCarthyism 2.0.”

I wasn’t around in the 1950s, Beto, but from what I’ve read, it was indeed a very difficult time to be a communist in this country. Lots of private citizens were dragged before Congress, made to take “loyalty oaths," and blacklisted in their places of work. I can’t justify it or condone it, but I can explain it. We had just fought a hot war against fascism and Nazism and just begun a Cold War against a communist regime. The existence of an organized Communist Party in this country at such a time strained the limits of tolerance. But do you really think we’re less tolerant today than we were seventy-five years ago? Do you really believe my comments about communists who claim to be communists are synonymous with another Red Scare? If you haven’t noticed, Chris, no one in the DSA, including the communists, is being dragged before Congress and made to swear a loyalty oath to the Constitution. Today, a communist in America can run for office…with the endorsement of the governor of California! And the tacit approval of a major political party! Seems to me we’re about as far from McCarthyism as we can get.

As for my desire not to alienate anyone, I suppose I am guilty of that. I run a foundation that is open to people of all political beliefs, and we’ve assisted lots of Americans who lean to the left. I also know for a fact that many Democrats have supported mikeroweWORKS historically, and I have no desire to run them off. But do you really have to “read between the lines” to understand where I’m coming from?

True, I’ve never endorsed a candidate or publicly encouraged people to vote. But I’ve been very transparent about the fact that I’m a registered Independent who favors policies and programs that often align with conservative principles. Obviously, I would not characterize those conservative principles as “Trumpian,” because a) they were around long before him, b) Trump is not a conservative, and c) I do not agree with or support everything the President says and does. So, is it possible, Beto, that your accusation is rooted in the fact that I have never publicly denounced the president to your satisfaction? Is it possible you think I'm a Trumper, simply because I've never called him a fascist, or a Nazi, or a liar, or a conman, or a traitor, or whatever else you believe him to be?

Gretchen Seipp… Mike, the fact that you still act as though you’re not political after all this time is a bit ridiculous. I still support your work and foundation because I believe in it, but the folksy act has worn thin.

Aw, shucks, Gretchen. Folksy? Lil' ole me?
Honestly, how am I acting as if I am “not political?” This entire conversation is the very definition of “political.”

Christopher Pugh… I would have voted for Mike Rowe and Freddie a few years ago before he went full-on MAGA, and I’m all in favor of his project, but it’s pretty clear the political direction that he’s moved in and the money trail that has influenced it.

It’s Freddy, not Freddie. (I don’t much care, but he’s a terrier and particular about such things.) As for the “full-on MAGA” moniker, is there something I did specifically to earn that designation? Is there some kind of general definition you can share? Or, are you coming from the same place as Beto? Is calling me “Full-On MAGA" your way of saying that I’ve failed to condemn Trump to your satisfaction?

For the record, MRW is supported by liberals and conservatives alike. I have no idea what “money trail” you are referring to. Also, regarding my personal politics, think about the implications of what I wrote. I said that the Democrats have been given a gift – an opportunity to appear reasonable by speaking the truth to their own party, just as Bill Maher has done. All they have to do is distance themselves from candidates who have called for the complete dismantlement of our Constitution. All they have to do is say, “Hold on, comrade. Our tent is not that big. We respect your right to hate America, but we don’t want you in our party, and we will not support your candidacy.”

If they say that, I think a lot of Independents would see them as they see John Fetterman, who has, in the eyes of many voters, become the most “rational” Democrat currently in office. If they don’t – if they actually welcome communist candidates into their party – then I’m afraid the Democrats, by default, will offer the American people a very simple choice in November – a party that disavows communism vs. a party that doesn’t. I think such a choice would be very positive for Republicans because I don’t think most Americans want to align themselves with a Democratic Party that welcomes communists. The question for you, Chris, is why would a “Full-On MAGA” like me encourage Democrats to act in a way that would disadvantage the Republican Party? And the answer is simple – it’s because I support the existence of a Democratic Party that believes America is still a fundamentally good place.

I think there’s a lot of room for improvement in our country, and I believe the best way to realize those improvements is for Democrats and Republicans to have continuous, robust and public debate about all the issues. But if one of those parties is affirmatively determined to transform our democratic republic into a communist state, then we’re no longer debating the various ways to make our country better; we’re debating the merits of destroying it. And really, what’s the point of tolerating that?

America is already a big tent, filled with hundreds of millions of people with wildly differing views and lots of political parties that represent those views. We’ve got the Green Party, the American Freedom Party, the Socialist Workers Party, the Constitution Party, and of course, the Communist Party USA, as well as the Democratic Socialist Party. America’s tent is so big, we can even tolerate fringe parties like the KKK, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and so forth. Why then, does Gavin Newsom want to make room in the Democratic tent for socialists and communists? There’s only one reason, and he’s already spelled it out for us – he believes the Democrats need them to win back the Congress. I think it’s a bad bet for the Democrats and for America. And if a prominent Republican reached out to the KKK with the same “big tent” offer, you’d better believe my vote would be in play.

Michael Tillman… When are you going to throw your hat into the ring, Mr. Rowe?

Ha! When it no longer fits my head!

[Owen Shroyer @OwenShroyer1776]

WHAT THE

[Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu]

‼️Candace Owens REVEALS That The Mystery Rooftop OFFICER Alan Robertson Is On a Brady List — Possible Dirty Cop?! 🤔

The plain-clothes officer who was on the Losee rooftop with Officer Bagley has been identified as Alan E. Robertson of Utah State University Police.

Bagley claimed under oath he couldn’t remember the man’s name. Footage shows Robertson was right there with him — and appeared to be directing activity on the roof.

Robertson is a former U.S. Marine and marksmanship instructor who previously worked for the San Bernardino Police Department in California before a sudden move to Utah.

He has an entry on a Brady list website — a database used by prosecutors to flag officers with documented issues involving dishonesty, misconduct, or integrity problems that affect their credibility as witnesses.

San Bernardino’s entries are blank because the department is not in full compliance with Brady disclosure rules. No public details of the incident are available.

A relatively new out-of-town officer ends up on the critical rooftop minutes after the shooting, seems to be calling the shots, has his identity protected by Bagley, and carries a Brady flag from his previous department.

Candace is asking for tips from anyone who worked with him in San Bernardino or the Marines.
FOLLOW @RealCandaceO RT, and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇