RottenOptimizer44

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

https://t.co/Emy3paFd8L

[Earth Is A Sales Funnel For SATAN @GENIC0N]

Normal life is a clever fiction to keep you from waking up in terror

[Earth Is A Sales Funnel For SATAN @GENIC0N]

if you can't talk about it, don't hint about it

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

I guess happiness is not normal condition of life. We didn't evolve to be happy. We evolved to survive to reproduce.

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

@mayukh091 He would feel threatened by humans taking over the world again since it was only Untitled3 and not Untitled3333

[Earth Is A Sales Funnel For SATAN @GENIC0N]

The elephant in the room is always the main character

[World of Engineering @engineers_feed]

“Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less.”
― Marie Curie

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

@Snowden

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

@elonmusk Kryptonite

[Edward Snowden @Snowden]

Gold is just bitcoin that can't be sent over the internet.

[roon @tszzl]

the entire project of civilization has been built by people who likely won't meet your exacting standards for being cool and fun

[Brangus🔍⏹️ @RatOrthodox]

I am suspicious of self styled intellectuals who have never been openly curious about something. Being openly curious requires being openly uncertain.

[Adam Grant @AdamMGrant]

When you only listen to the smartest person in the room, you miss out on discovering what the rest of the room is smart about.

Everyone you meet knows something you don’t—and has wisdom from experiences you haven’t lived.

Every conversation is a chance to learn something new.

[Nathalie Otter @Nathalie0tter]

A good test of whether someone is a genius or a charlatan is whether they actually *want* you to understand.

The genius is willing/able to simplify, the charlatan is trying to dazzle you.

(Further test is if they get irritated by follow up questions)

[Julia Galef @juliagalef]

In-person debates are very overrated (in some circles).

One reason is because you can "win" a debate through slick arguing tactics (e.g. the Gish gallop).

But another is that, in person, when one side cites evidence, the other side can't scrutinize that evidence on the spot.

[RottenOptimizer44 @optimizer44]

Do we all have...?