In bodycam footage, the suspect says,
"You can't touch me, I'm Muslim,"
while resisting arrest, attempting to invoke Islamophobia claims against officers who remain calm and continue their duties.
She warns, "You'll pay for this." the audacity.....!
https://t.co/y0XOfaHNzU
18 years ago: At his Nobel Peace Prize speech in December 2007, Al Gore warns the Arctic could be ice free as soon as 2014.
Reality: The Arctic ice cap had 500,000 square kilometers of ice more in September 2025 than when Al Gore made this call in 2007.
I agree with this assessment of yours on the causes of them being so docile, servile, and silent on issues that affect their communities and even them personally. They lack the support system Jews, Chinese, Anglo-Saxons have.
For example, Chinese have great networks within the US inside Chinese American communities that always work to protect their Chinese interests. Then the CCP or Taiwanese come to give outside support to make them work for their interests too.
A Chinese ethnicity CEO, even if he's American, will have no hesitation to speak up if say Chinese are racially targeted in the US. He will do it at the first instance he feels bad about it, knowing well he has a big network locally and internationally to back him and support his cause.
They will soon organise to institute changes from forcing companies like YouTube and X to change their Algo and censor racist posts. The Indian ceos who may be running these companies will immediately oblige.
But the same Indian origin CEOs will not do a damn about exponetiallly rising hate against Indian ethnicity in the US themselves. Not even talk about it.
"Why open mouth and get abused? Who's going to support me? May be I will get into trouble. Why get into trouble. Let's stay silent." This is their thought process. And this is mostly due to a lack of an organized community they can be adopted into supported from outside as well.
I have a hypothesis about why Indian CEOs are being selected in such large numbers by international boards.
Indian CEOs are, of course, smart, talented, and capable leaders. But plenty of Americans, Brits, Israelis, Europeans, Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans are too.
And it's not just about speaking English either, as some think, given immigrant Indians are chosen as being better than American or five eyes born native English speakers who are equal, or more in numbers in the western talent pool.
My theory is that they're chosen because they tend to be docile and servile along with all the great qualifications and qualities of a leader.
An Anglo-Saxon white, Chinese, or Israeli CEO might let their community's or birth country's interests creep in and interfere at some point. Or they will just be more brave and open about voicing their opinions and taking decisions which may affect shareholder value.
For example, in the recent H1B visa fee hike case, I saw so many Whites (including Elon), Jewish and Chinese Americans (including CEOs) openly come out against it and support hi-tech immigration, even directly support Indian immigrants.
Indian origin leaders, on the other hand, are a safe bet for keeping their mouths shut in silence. For instance, they haven't yet posted a single line condemning racial targeting, attacks, or killings of Indians, or speak out against H-1B visa policy changes that hurt their own community - or even their own company.
Indians, especially India born ones, can just be trusted to play it safe, focusing solely on their personal and company interests. In fact, they'll bend over backwards to serve their boards, companies, and the deep state, if any, dictating.
My hypothesis can be further proven by seeing that India born Indian origin leaders are picked for CEO jobs in US companies, and not many US born Indian Americans (not even close) who are as qualified with all the great credentials and just as good - if it is really the race or culture that makes good CEOs.
Because, even though they are Indians with similar achievements, qualifications from top schools, and capabilities, being born and brought up in the US, they tend to have a bit more of the independent American spirit and much less of the docility and spineless, servile attitude.
Blacks control the government
- 😂
Asians control the government
- 😂
Muslims control the government
- 😂
Mexicans control the government
- 😂
Jews control the government
- Fired from job, investigated by FBI
One of these seems more valid than the others…
The “evidence” that virtually all global warming since, say 1950, is man-made is a theory only supported by computer modeling that relies on circular reasoning and faith. While it may be the leading theory, that doesn't mean that the theory is correct. It isn't up to skeptics to develop an alternative theory that's better, the burden of proof is on you to prove that your theory is correct.
BREAKING—Ron Unz @UnzReview reveals that a source who knew Charlie Kirk unequivocally told him: "everyone in Kirk’s circle, even including important Trump Administration officials, suspected that Israel had probably killed the young conservative leader."
If true, these people must provide receipts. There's no time to waste.
🚨🇮🇱🇺🇸 BREAKING: Resurfaced video of the patsy George Zinn, who was ARRESTED while creating the diversion amid Charlie Kirk's assassination, recounts how he knew Al Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attack the moment he saw the towers fall.
They really had everybody convinced that the police are the modern KKK and exist to hunt and oppress black people to uphold white supremacy.
Then people started seeing 300 images like this every single week when Elon bought Twitter.