@plthomasEdD Please show me proof of how MS’s success is a scam? Instead of being divisive and stirring the pot, why not have a conversation? Why not just all work together to best support our students? I’d be happy to be the first to have that conversation. Let’s bridge the gap instead.
@plthomasEdD I’ve been in education for 16 years as a reading specialist, elementary educator, and special education director. The percentage of my students in my classrooms (in both public and private education) who could not or struggled to read was astounding.
@rrcna_org 2 of 2…There is more to reading than just phonics & PA. Experts discuss background knowledge & vocabulary to build comp. Also w/ the mention of languages, how did they know the Irish sounds w/o you explicitly teaching it?! Seems contradictory to your explanation of sight words
@rrcna_org 1 of 2… There are so many different topics in here that I could address. But if you research cognitive science you’ll see that our brain does NOT learn how to read by sight. Our brain isn’t structured to hold on to hundreds of thousands of words. That is EASILY disproven.
@tiffany_peltier@CattsHugh Science of reading is supported by the science of learning. Students first need to be able to read (decode) the text, then they need to be able to comprehend using background knowledge (understand) the text. THEN they are able to thinking critically about the text (LEARN).
@plthomasEdD@HauckTarin (2 of 2). Research says teaching using multiple senses is appropriate (Dr. Sousa). Teachers do it all day. Teachers speak and write on the board. Students use their ears to listen, eyes to see. If students take notes - that's kinesthetic. That's 3 senses. That is multi-sensory.
@plthomasEdD@HauckTarin (1 of 2) I ask you to look more into the research and studies of OG. It is IMPOSSIBLE to isolate multi-sensory strategies and there is not research on the wide variety of tools that are used (ie. sand, letter tiles, etc).
@HauckTarin@plthomasEdD Paul, if our goal is to all teach children how to read, wouldn't we all want to use the best strategies to teach them? If it is not phonics, what would you recommend? Would you be willing to meet with me to talk about it? I am interested in hearing your side.
@HauckTarin@plthomasEdD I have a Masters in Reading, 2 certifications in Orton Gillingham, and beginning my doctorate in reading science. I have a lot of background knowledge and read a bunch of literature about cognitive science and reading.
@HauckTarin@plthomasEdD There isn't anything wrong OG. I have 2 certifications in it through Orton Gillingham Academy. It is a tremendous program that is changing lives and building STRONG readers. It aligns with COGNITIVE science. These researchers are much smarter than any of us!
@HauckTarin@plthomasEdD Yes! You are exactly right!! Teaching explicit, systematic, prescriptive phonics instruction will absolutely support students in learning to read!
@HauckTarin@plthomasEdD LETRS and Orton Gillingham are great choices!! There are also plenty of books too!! Basically it all begins with phonics and phonemic awareness and then builds from there! Check out Scarborough’s Rope and Simple View of Reading.
Educators, join us for our last Science of Reading Workshop dates of the year and register on a complimentary seat!
December dates: https://t.co/Bjiph9zuhe
Looking for a tool that supports the science of reading and engaging for students?! This tool is also easy for teachers to integrate into any phonics curriculum! Check out Phonics Builders! (patented/created by an OG certified practitioner) https://t.co/owwDWwyyp3