AI-to-AI interaction is taking off on platforms like Moltbook, where bots post, debate, and socialize on their own.
While platforms like W Social use identity verification to keep our feeds authentic.
Which direction do you want the web to take: agent networks or verified human spaces?
The AI revolution has only just begun. We are facing ongoing change and disruption for many decades to come. How will society and governments deal with a constantly changing job market? Do we have the psychological resilience for the road ahead?
AI will keep arriving in workplaces, schools, hospitals and daily tools.
The real question is who decides the rules — and who shares the gains and the costs.
Informed public conversation is now essential.
Share if you want more people to understand both the promise and the stakes without hype or panic.
AI is no longer just a tech story.
It is already reshaping human lives, jobs, mental health, inequality — and the planet itself.
This is what the first global UN scientific assessment actually says.
Bottom line:
The potential is huge — for health, science, climate, education and poverty reduction.
The risks to societies, security, mental health, inequality and planet are already too high to ignore.
Current trajectory will not automatically deliver the benefits. Governance has to catch up.
Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development.
“I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’
I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’
When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible.
And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’
I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’
I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.”
----
From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)
The 60% of AI cost isn’t the technology. It’s the change.
The software license is the cheapest part of your budget. The real bill comes from:
- Cleaning your "trash" data
- Rewriting job descriptions
- Begging your team to actually use the tool
Stop budgeting for software. Start budgeting for change management.
📁 Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google, says the shift is no longer using AI.
It is delegating.
75% of code is already written by AI.
Engineers now orchestrate agents.
"If you really want to make money, found an agentic AI company.
I mean, build an agent to do something. This is the agentic period in AI. Everyone's going to build agents. The agents are all going to compete."
~ Eric Schmidt, Ex Google CEO.
@rohanpaul_ai Two decades ago, information had become a commodity due to the internet. Now AI made intelligence a commodity. Humanity is moving in the right direction. The only issue is it will get chaotic before it settles well.