Treasury’s own analysts disagree.
In May, GAO found that U.S. shell companies continue to pose significant illicit finance risks, citing Treasury’s 2026 National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, which documented shell companies laundering the proceeds of drug trafficking, cybercrime, and fraud. https://t.co/TPabGw2mUT
Given the significant risks, GAO asked Treasury identify options for addressing the gap the exemption creates. Treasury refused and now it has finalized a rule that exempts over 99 percent of the entities that were previously required to report.
As GAO has explained, “….there are generally no restrictions on foreign ownership of companies formed in the United States. As a result, an exempt domestic reporting company could have foreign (non-U.S.) ownership, or transnational criminal organizations could use individuals in the United States to establish U.S. shell companies to facilitate illicit activity.”
In other words, by exempting domestic entities from beneficial ownership reporting, Treasury has created a loophole so large that the US corporate transparency requirements are functionally meaningless for anyone sophisticated enough to spend five minutes at a secretary of state’s website.
@CheeseForEvery1 The fault in almost all of these cancellations lies with the institution! Yes, the student is a whiny bugger, but really, why can’t administrators see through the nonsense?
@RichardHanania I am pro technology, and I’m quite sure, alongside drones and DNA databases and other technologies, we can make tremendous improvements in managing crime. But consider undoubtedly Trump‘s creature the Attorney General has access to a national database of innocent citizens.
@newrepublic We are going to be left with a lot of half finished projects by the end of his term. A physical mass, a true monument to the state of the country.
@CathyYoung63 I say “please”, which I’m told is a mistake because it adds to the cost of processing. Could be good in the long run, however, to be known as a good guy…