well written, well argued presentation of real world harms of AI without going into histrionics
it won’t get the same amount of pickup bc it’s not scifi coded, but it’s just as concerned
https://t.co/ko6nLkYr3L
George Orwell, in 1984, describes how the Party keeps the Proletarians sedated with “five-cent novelettes, films oozing with sex, and sentimental songs which were composed entirely by mechanical means on a special kind of kaleidoscope known as a versificator.”
Here is the difference between graphics research and an expensive image filter.
The Callisto Protocol’s skin rendering is the result of actually modelling the problem. Its rendering research deals with skin thickness, light transmission, subsurface scattering, specular response and how those properties behave under different lighting conditions. The render is 1:1 to the actual photo, it doesnt add imaginary sweat, oily skin, shadows etc.
The important part is that the material stays the material. Change the lighting, hair or environment and the skin still responds according to the parameters authored by the artists. The renderer isn’t looking at the final frame and deciding that “realistic human skin probably needs more pores, grease, contrast or wrinkles.”
That’s fundamentally different from what DLSS 5 is doing.
DLSS 5 operates on the final rendered image and uses a learned model to guess a more photorealistic result. It does not suddenly possess a better physical model of that character’s skin, cloth or lighting. It is estimating what those pixels should look like from its training data.
And that distinction becomes obvious in examples like this: facial regions acquire shadows that weren’t produced by the scene’s original lighting, while clothing gains apparent detail that wasn’t present in the authored material.
Those additions may look plausible. Plausible is not the same thing as correct.
A physically motivated skin shader asks: given this geometry, material and incident light, how should light interact with it?
A generative image model effectively asks: given these pixels, what would a more photorealistic version probably look like?
The first is graphics research. The second is inference.
Callisto demonstrates what happens when you research the material and improve the renderer itself. DLSS 5, at least from these examples, looks more like an extremely expensive “realism” filter applied after the actual rendering work has already been done.
I've seen folks deriding DLSS 5 as forcing photorealism, but the look of DLSS 5 is not realism. It's an aesthetic of heavily doctored shitty-HDR YouTube thumbnails.
Realism-adjacent? Sure, but light doesn't work the way DLSS 5 portrays it. DLSS 5 is a Mr Beast thumbnail filter.
Aquí un Lead Artist de Naughty Dog explicando porqué el DLSS 5 es una puta mierda.
Porque, en efecto, es una putisima mierda: se folla la dirección e intención artística de mala manera.
see this is my problem with AI.
you can supposedly make anything with it, your imagination should know no bounds, and yet you STILL choose to play in a sandbox that someone else made. this is ghiblification all over again. it's not about cost or speed, it's that even without the technical limitations, you're still deeply unimaginative or curious and so you resort to imitation.
My favorite thing about this song is that Chad Kroger decided to make it a solo song because it "didn't fit the Nickelback sound" and it just sounds exactly like a Nickelback song
stuff like this is why i keep betting on a reversion to human-ness
when everything around you eventually has like 50-50 odds of being real, i'd guess people begin flocking to other people in some hope for ground truth
(hence the "no AI used here" becoming a marketing point)
people who use ai for businesses baffle me. do they not read what these produce? do they not think this is decieving customers? it makes tou look lazy and i think you deserve to fail as a business
Flock takes their privacy very seriously.
But the ethical gray area in surveillance technology works both ways.
Under no circumstances should elected officials or public servants enjoy an expectation of privacy when spending tax dollars to attend a surveillance lobbying event.
Here's a complaint form for the Federal Competition Bureau.
https://t.co/avshu7TbRk
Rogers took away our over the air options in CBC & local AM radio then upped their app rates. This is a monopoly. Make your voice heard.
One year later and @Sportsnet is at it again. I think I've reached my limit with these clowns.
STILL not on Roku. STILL dropping feeds. Price is now double what it was three years ago.
Must be because the Jays are doing so great? Or because they overbid on the NHL and we have to pay for that mistake?
On a side note, I've enjoyed the seamless @TSN coverage that I can just click on my Roku TV easily.
First @Rogers, now @CorusPR. Black July continues.
Sure hope media executives understand what they’re doing to regional divisions & western alienation. Because if one wants to be a pan-🇨🇦 company, one must behave like a pan-🇨🇦 company.
That means Toronto doesn’t *cover* Calgary & Edmonton. 🙄