I don't condone any of what I've seen in Belfast. I mean, I'd go to prison if I did, but all the same, it's not my preferred way of doing things. But then my preferred way of doing things (voting and public debate) hasn't made the slightest impact on the decision-making of the state. As such, there was a certain inevitability about this.
Moreover, it's not really my place to judge. I am an extremely fortunate individual who happens to live in a 99% white area, miles from any "diversity" and thanks to my self-employed status, I don't have to self-censor or live a double life at work. I don't have to bottle up my opinions. I actually make a modest income by expressing them.
Most low income working class people, meanwhile, have to live in close proximity to diversity and the squalor that goes with it. Their votes are even more worthless as mine, and they can't speak their minds freely because there'll be some HR ghoul in the mix who will fire them. Ordinary people bear the burden of potentially losing everything for having the wrong opinions.
Meanwhile, they can work hard to carve out a little corner of peace for themselves, just for the local authority to turn next door into a migrant HMO with illegal Deliveroo drivers coming and going at all hours. It's their communities being turned into alien, hostile and violent slums. To then say there is no justification for riots is to tell them they simply have to suck it up - even when they run the risk of an African savage beheading them. What are they supposed to do? Write to their MP? Everyone has a breaking point.
While politicians call for calm, they can only expect to be heeded if they actually do something, but remaining calm when the politicians continue to sit on their hands as people are butchered in the street is absolutely bovine. Ultimately these riots are a consequence of the wilful deafness of politicians, and the blame for what we've seen tonight lies squarely in their shop.
They’re using the guy beheading your brother in the street to distract you from your real enemy: Jeff Bezos delivering medicine to your front door overnight
@IanGee2023@ArchRose90 I shared the clip of Henry Novak on Facebook and got overwhelming disdain from my connections there because it was a link from Tommy Robinson. They smugly accused me of associating with a racist and sniffed their own farts, none were interested in what happened to Henry.
https://t.co/j58CYkil13
Man attempts to behead another man in the street.
"No evidence of terror at this stage, say police"
If that isn’t terror, what is? How much more terrifying does it need to be to qualify as terror?
Something has shifted in Britain. A change that was building for a long time has burst upon us. We see it in the reaction to Henry Nowak’s murder. We see it in the response to the failure to section Valdo Calocane.
People are no longer paralysed by the fear of saying the wrong thing on race. They understand that this fear contributed to both tragedies.
They grasp that, as long as being accused of lacking proper racial sensitivity was the worst thing that could happen to a public-sector worker, the incentives were skewed. They sense that the same anxiety lay behind the failure to restrain Axel Rudakubana, and that it hampered investigation of the rape gangs. They see, in short, that anti-racism has become literally lethal.
I fear the backlash will not be pretty. I hope we can stick to the ideal of a society in which skin colour matters no more than hair colour. But I worry that we may be past that point. The anti-racist bellicosity that we have seen since the Great Awokening, especially from 2015, is conjuring an ugly response. Precisely as some of us tried to warn at the time.
Two observations. First, this is the best voice of Muslims in Israel that both the media and the Gaza fanatics ignore.
Second, when’s the last time you heard a British Muslim speak like this? There have been some but not many. Why?
Scenes of violence? It’s not a fucking punch up outside a pub at kicking out time.
This is a foreigner trying to fucking decapitate a white man. It’s attempted murder. It’s sickening. It’s psychopathic.
And it’ll happen again and again and again whilst weak cunts like you are in charge.
The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images
Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph reveal the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people
The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote".
In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks.
That was the only way that "nature" could win.
However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo.
The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House.
The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear
This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural.
Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain"
Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar.
The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists.
Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths.
Me on @GBNews:
Two days after Henry died Hampshire Police secretly recorded Digwa in a police van speaking Punjabi to his brother. Digwa admitted stabbing Henry. Discussed claiming self defence. Made zero mention of racial abuse. Not one word.
Hampshire Police had that tape.
They knew Digwa was lying about the racist attack. They had the evidence. They had his own words and then tried to smear Henry as the aggressor anyway.
Three days after his death their statement read “it was reported two men had been assaulted by an unknown man.” Henry was the unknown man. The boy bleeding out on the street. They flipped it.
Family complained. Statement changed. Then police told the family their NEXT update would again infer Henry was the initial aggressor. His family had to fight them a second time. While grieving their murdered son.
Then during the trial Hampshire tried to issue a statement telling the public to stop talking about it online. Calling it disinformation. The CPS had to step in. Told them they were about to collapse their own murder case.
This is the force that handcuffed a dying boy. Missed the murder weapon twice. Had a secret tape proving the killer lied. And still tried to bury Henry's name.
That's not incompetence. That's a machine protecting itself. At the expense of a dead boy's reputation and three officers are still on active duty. Not suspended. Treated as witnesses. To their own actions.
Hampshire Police didn't just fail Henry on that street. They kept failing him for six months after he died.
- @Banksycat
The Nowak scandal exposes a deeper culture that runs through policing and politics alike: the instinct to pathologise public anger rather than confront institutional wrongdoing.
The Home Secretary talks about a “dangerous undercurrent” of commentary, as though the real threat is people being furious that a dying teenager was treated as a perpetrator, not a victim.
The PCC frets about “police morale” and “online abuse”, as if the reputational harm from criticism is worse than the moral harm of leaving Boon in charge.
And Hampshire’s leadership, instead of accepting the obvious — that handcuffing a mortally wounded boy and then trying to control the narrative is indefensible — doubles down on PR.
This isn’t policing in the public interest; it’s a political class circling the wagons around its own.
If you agree please share and support my work in holding labour to account.
Prohibiting ASI could well be the thing that ushers in catastrophe because it will mean prohibiting research into all kinds of areas of mathematics, physics, materials science and other fundamental areas: