@yashUkalkar@catalinmpit Wouldn't it be the opposite? So it's expected for the company that has millions of dollars to ship laggy and shit code but a startup which has 30 customers must ship perfect code?
Let's say current LLMs write 50% worse code than if you wrote it yourself by hand with care and love. That's only worth it if you assume LLMs will not get better by at least 50% in the next year to fix and refactor it when it becomes actually important.
@catalinmpit Who cares tho? Out of all the things i want to be involved with in my life "converting a dialog to a popover" is something i would happily delegate to an LLM at the cost that it's 30% worse than if i wrote it by hand and it's sloppier and whatever. It's ui who cares
@awesomekling I did some experiment and i replicated a website 1:1 in rust+egui and it was 50MB in RAM! I'm taking the entire website, ui components, animations, logic and everything. The binary was 7 MB with no dynamic libraries!! No DOM no webview. The LLM just rawdogged all the pixels.
@awesomekling I did some experiment and i replicated a website 1:1 in rust+egui and it was 50MB in RAM! I'm taking the entire website, ui components, animations, logic and everything. The binary was 7 MB with no dynamic libraries!! No DOM no webview. The LLM just rawdogged all the pixels.
Human code is very expensive. Many layers of abstractions were traditionally created less to handle complexity but more for developer convince. Now that LLMs are writing the code most of them become useless
LLMs learned how to write code from humans. This means LLMs write code with assumptions that were true when humans wrote code but no longer true when agents write the code. LLMs being bad at time estimates is one of the side effects of this problem
@MansiCodez the chance of that happening is very slim. so when that happens i send an apology email to the customer and offer a discount code and ignore the problem. what are you google? amazon? what if a volcano erupts. do i have to handle that too?