Irina

Passionate person

[Irina @oxidcount]

@SybilHorror6 @mlazarevm @PrimordialAA @GhazwanAli18 @PrimordialAA @LayerZero_Labs will decide whether our wallets true or Sybil, not you. I’ve read your post about cash back from bounty program.

[Irina @oxidcount]

@mlazarevm @PrimordialAA @GhazwanAli18 Absolutely agree!

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA #broken17884

[Irina @oxidcount]

@mlazarevm @PrimordialAA 1000% agrée

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA author said that clusters without « 100% unique sibyl » mark should be dismissed.
Author doesn’t sure about his own methodology! Report 17884 should be denied!

https://t.co/8SiYgfRSBy

[Irina @oxidcount]

@brutalapple91 @PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA please, check it! ❤️

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @nansen_ai @PrimordialAA report 17875 is also false positive
I wrote about it

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA Dear Bryan @PrimordialAA , one more strange report from which suffer 3298 wallets: https://t.co/gZJIwGqltH

This report also shows lack of methodology because marks transactions on Celo and Core chains in the period when Polyhedra campaign on Galxe took place.

[Irina @oxidcount]

@cryptojelay @PrimordialAA @ddnko_a @nansen_ai Also useful thread

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA Dear Bryan @PrimordialAA , one more strange report from which suffer 3298 wallets: https://t.co/gZJIwGqltH

This report also shows lack of methodology because marks transactions on Celo and Core chains in the period when Polyhedra campaign on Galxe took place.

[Irina @oxidcount]

@cryptojelay @PrimordialAA @ddnko_a @nansen_ai Polyhedra users are not sybils!

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @ddnko_a @nansen_ai @PrimordialAA Bryan, report 17884 is false positive

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA account @SybilHorror6 created in May 2024. He is main Sybil!

[brutalapple @brutalapple91]

@PrimordialAA Team L0 is one of the most dedicated to their work, thank you for such attention! Much has already been said about 17884, here it is really well explained, read pls

https://t.co/nPzfZb8ZtR

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA #broken17884

[Irina @oxidcount]

@dip0l12 @yylativ @PrimordialAA You’re absolutely right!

[Nogales Armato @ArmatoNoga71418]

@PrimordialAA This is unbelievable. I thought everything was already resolved with my report, so many dissatisfied and sufficient evidence. 17884 is really broken. If there are still doubts, take a look here.

https://t.co/pF1eyVrjyW

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA @cipher_elite what do you think about #broken17884 report?

https://t.co/hcrKHvkd0s

[Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅) @PrimordialAA]

Always a game of cat and mouse. Hunter and hunted (swarmed anyways). Fun times

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA where should we name our wallets that suffered in this #broken17884 report?
Especially in “cluster” 452 without “100% unique cluster” mark!

[Irina @oxidcount]

@soremitti136096 @PrimordialAA Absolutely!

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA check this thread

[Cryptotyk @cryptotyk]

1/8 https://t.co/qnROyIP68i
This report should not be considered in the final allocation due to material errors in methodology:
1. Priority of transactions in Ethereum:
This report gives a great weight to transactions in this network,

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA check this thread

[Irina @oxidcount]

@PrimordialAA Dear Bryan and Layer Zero team!
Thank you for your great job done to analyze all the reports and all on-chain activity on Layer Zero project!

Today I saw a massive report 17884 of 32 000 «sybil» wallets https://t.co/hcrKHvkd0s